 |
| Courtesy Medium |
A study of 6,000
Danes was set to reveal whether wearing a face mask actually reduces the risk
of COVID-19. The only problem is leading medical journals are refusing to
publish the data, and the study's lead author hinted it's because they're not
"brave enough" to do it
Does a mask work? It's a question recently posed by the Danish
newspaper Berlingske,[i] and one that
would seem to demand an answer from scientists and public health officials
alike. Yet, despite mask mandates existing in 34 U.S. states and the District
of Columbia,[ii] there's shockingly
little hard data about whether or not they slow the spread of infectious
disease.
Researchers from
Denmark wanted to change that, conducting what may be the only randomized trial[iii] to determine if masks actually protect
against COVID-19,[iv] but multiple medical journals have refused
to publish the findings.
Thomas Benfield, a
researcher at the University of Copenhagen and one of the study's
lead authors,[v] was asked when it would be published. Former New
York Times reporter Alex Berenson published Benfield's
emailed response on Twitter, which is simply: "As soon as a journal is
brave enough …"[vi]
What Does the Danish Mask Study Reveal?
Speaking to Nature in October 2020, Benfield said his team
wasn't yet ready to share the study's results.[vii] In truth, three
medical journals -- The Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine and the
Journal of the American Medical Association -- have refused to publish the
study, leading to speculation that it reveals a message that goes against the
status quo.
Berlingske, which is the oldest daily newspaper in Denmark,
suggests this is so, stating (loosely translated), "The researchers behind
a large and unique Danish study on the effect of wearing a mask even have great
difficulty in getting their research results published. One of the participating
professors in the study admits that the still secret research result can be
perceived as 'controversial.'"[viii],[ix]
The study included
6,000 participants who were randomly assigned to wear a face mask or not for a 30-day period. Participants
were confirmed to not have COVID-19 or symptoms of it at the start of the
study, and they were required to spend more than three hours per day outside of
the home with exposure to other people during the study period.[x]
Described as an "outstanding
sample," the Berlingske article, which was written
by Lars Henrik Aagaard, praised the study, noting, "The study and its size
are unique in the world, and the purpose was once and for all to try to clarify
the extent to which the use of masks in public space provides protection
against corona infection."[xi]
While the results
were originally expected to be published in August 2020, Benfield later said
that his comment was taken "a bit out of context" and, "The
article is being reviewed by a respected journal. We have decided not to
publish data until the article has been accepted."[xii]
Study Co-Author Hints at Controversial Results
Aagaard interviewed another of the study's researchers,
Christian Torp-Pedersen, a chief physician at North Zealand Hospital's research
department, who similarly said, "We cannot start discussing what they (the
medical journals) are dissatisfied with because, in that case, we must also
explain what the study showed, and we do not want to discuss that until it is
published."[xiii]
He then went on to
say that he "might also have dared to go as far as Benfield," had
he been asked why the results haven't been published, referring to his "brave
enough" comment. Aagaard asks, "Does
this mean that your research results may be perceived as controversial in the
eyes of some?" to which Torp-Pedersen replies, "That's
how I want to interpret it, too."
Aagaard then states, "Can
one interpret a controversial research result in the sense that no significant
effect of mask use is demonstrated in your study?" Torp-Pedersen says, "I
think that's a very relevant question you are asking."[xiv]
Dr. Henning
Bundgaard with
Denmark was one of the latest countries to institute a mask mandate,
which took effect October 29, 2020 for all public indoor spaces.[xvi] In July,
however, Bundgaard told Bloomberg he worried mask mandates may offer a
"false sense of security" and make people "sloppy" when
following other guidelines like handwashing, self-isolating if you're sick and
social distancing. Also revealing is Bloomberg's last paragraph:
"Bundgaard's study on masks is due to be published
next month. In the meantime, he says he hopes they don't become mandatory in
Masks have become a contentious topic in the
Refences
[i] Washington
Examiner
[ii] Axios
[iii] Twitter
[iv] ClinicalTrials.gov,
Reduction in COVID-19 Infection Using Surgical Facial Masks Outside the
Healthcare System https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04337541
[v] Nature
[vi] Twitter
[vii] Nature
[viii] The Blaze
[ix] Berlingske
[x] Washington
Examiner
[xi] The Blaze
[xii] Washington
Examiner
[xiii] The Blaze
[xiv] The Blaze
[xv] Bloomberg
[xvi] The Local
[xvii] Bloomberg
[xviii] Twitter
The GMI Research Group (GMIRG) is
dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues
of the day. Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health. Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in which the present condition of the human
body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment.
Disclaimer: This article is not
intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed
here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
·
There are no excess deaths. The same number of people have died
in 2020 that, on average, have died in previous years. This simply wouldn’t be
the case if we had a lethal pandemic
·
The slight uptick in deaths now being reported in
the
·
The PCR test is not a valid diagnostic tool and
should not be done on the scale we’re now doing it. The high rate of false
positives is only fodder for needless fearmongering
·
Virtually no one who is asymptomatic has the live
virus, but when you run the test at a cycle threshold over 30, meaning you
amplify the viral RNA more than 30 times, you end up with a positive test even
if the virus is inactive and noninfectious
·
According to Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former
vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer, very
few people will need the COVID-19 vaccine as the mortality rate is so low and
the illness is clearly not causing excess deaths
Even Dr.?
Fauci said the masks don't work, and could increase the spread. The CDC originally said the masks are not needed. Then they changed their official stance. Why? Because they are pushing
an agenda.
Similar to the Professor Witty (Whitty) alleged bribe in the last POST and Gates dIagram. If you join the dots you can see who like the UK MHRA the CDC is backed by and funded by.
the mask keeps the fear going. They need to http://
nforce the mask wearing to remind people how terrified
they're supposed be. If people aren't walking around wearing them, they'll
eventually forget about the covid and be much harder to manipulate and control.
The large scale scope of coordinated psychological manipulation on display is
astounding...t
 |
| Courtesy FutureLearn |
The design of these are scary and children and some adults including me when we see these caped grotesque figures wonder whether we are living in Dante's Inferno.
Inferno (Italian: [iɱˈfɛrno]; Italian for "Hell") is the first part of Italian writer Dante Alighieri's 14th-century epic poem Divine Comedy. It is followed by Purgatorio and Paradiso. The Inferno describes Dante's journey through Hell, guided by the ancient Roman poet Virgil. In the poem, Hell is depicted as nine concentric circles of torment located within the Earth; it is the "realm ... of those who have rejected spiritual values by yielding to bestial appetites or violence, or by perverting their human intellect to fraud or malice against their fellowmen".[1] As an allegory, the Divine Comedy represents the journey of the soul toward God, with the Inferno describing the recognition and rejection of sin.[2]
Here are some of the modern circles; 1) lock down. 2) Mask 3) Vaccination's 4) Total surveillance 5) Health and biometric passport / certificate 6) Chipped or tattoo 7) Social distancing 8) Unproven science messages 9) Censorship and no alternative allowed except the official (so called ignoring real science) narrative. There are more circles I could add to Senor Dante's narrative.
Health passports' for air travel mean mandatory Covid-19 vaccines cloaked in the illusion of choice
U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report revealed that, of the symptomatic adults with COVID-19, 70.6% always wore a mask and still got sick, compared to 7.8% for those who rarely or never wore a mask
· Dr. Jim Meehan, an ophthalmologist, conducted an evidence-based scientific analysis on masks, which shows that not only should healthy people not be wearing masks, but they could be harmed as a result
· A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as lockdowns, quarantines and mask mandates, have not significantly affected overall virus transmission rates
· Children forced to wear masks for long periods could experience mental and psychological repercussions, and at least 17 physical risks are also posed by wearing masks
· With the lack of solid evidence to support mask use among the general population, it appears as though mask mandates are being used as political and psychological tools rather than one aimed at protecting public health
·
 |
| Courtesy imgflip |
So, what else ‘Makes Me Sick’? From Robert Redfern
- The ‘Pharma/Medical Criminal Cartel’ who are fined billions for their crimes are being allowed to give advice to governments.
- The ‘Pharma/Medical Criminal Cartel’ who are fined billions for their crimes are being allowed to produce untested vaccines and have been absolved of all criminal and financial responsibility.
- Governments recommending Flu and other vaccines instead of vitamin D3, vitamin C zinc, selenium, and magnesium to support the immune system to avoid Flu (and most diseases). When I was born we were given some of these super vitamins free by the government to keep us healthy. I still take them today and every day.
- Governments ignoring the Swedish results from no lockdown and almost zero deaths recently from CV. (Yes, they made mistakes in the early days by not giving those in care homes the supplements and shielding them.)
- Governments/schools not advising/educating the people that diseases are caused by lack of exercise, nutrients, consuming factory processed foods, microwaved ready meals, and other junk foods. Since they like draconian laws, why not ban junk foods?
- Locking down the world with martial laws that take away all rights and freedoms. All at the behest of the ‘Pharma/Medical Criminal Cartel’ and The World Economic Forum. Their plan is to drug everyone, and as well as reduce the world population (which they state clearly). Lastly, they have started their plan to control everyone via facial recognition, mobile apps, and implanted chips (as was successfully tested in
- The lack of science in all the training that medical doctors have. Even when they know about vitamin D3, vitamin C, zinc, selenium, and magnesium to support the immune system most are too scared of the ‘Pharma/Medical Criminal Cartel’ to provide these as solutions. They take away and destroy the livelihoods of doctors who actively recommend nutrition rather than drugs.
 |
| Courtesy makemeameme.org Certainly in the USA babies and children are given |
According to a study that examined how informed consent is given to COVID-19 vaccine trial participants, disclosure forms fail to inform volunteers that the vaccine might make them susceptible to more severe disease if they’re exposed to the virus
· Previous coronavirus vaccine efforts — including those for SARS, MERS and RSV — have revealed a serious concern: The vaccines have a tendency to trigger antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE)
· ADE means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated
· Lethal Th2 immunopathology is another potential risk. A faulty T cell response can trigger allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes can activate the complement system, resulting in airway damage
· There’s evidence showing the elderly — who are most vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and would need the vaccine the most — are also the most vulnerable to ADE and Th2 immunopathology
The Nightingale Pledge is a modified version of the Hippocratic Oath for doctors whereby nurses pledge to uphold certain ethics and principles within the nursing profession.
 |
| Courtesy Amazon.com |
First created in 1893, the Nightingale Pledge is most often taken by North American nurses and not generally found outside of the USA. Florence did not write the Nightingale Pledge but it was named in her honour.
The massive Nightingale super tent hospitals quickly erected at the first lock down and the one in London had 5,000 beds and ventilators had only 50 patients and over half had other complaints;
A Freedom of Information request has revealed that the government spent an estimated £220 million setting up England’s Nightingale hospitals to help increase NHS capacity.
The numbers cover all of the seven sites built to help the country deal with the coronavirus outbreak, but, according to the Health Service Journal, some of these field hospitals have not taken in a coronavirus patient to date.
The temporary site in London, the first Nightingale hospital to open in April, stopped taking in new patients in early May following limited demand for its services. In mid-May, the Manchester hospital remained the only one of the temporary sites in England treating patients.
The Nightingale hospital in Yorkshire recently announced that it would reopen for CT scans for hundreds of patients a week.
Alongside the £220 million set up costs, running costs in April were revealed to be around £15 million.
 |
| Courtesy You Tube |
 |
| Courtesy The Conversation |
 |
| Courtesy Fox News |
 |
| Courtesy memedroid |
The ChAdOx1 vaccine is a chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine vector. This is a harmless, weakened adenovirus that usually causes the common cold in chimpanzees. ChAdOx1 was chosen as the most suitable vaccine technology for a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as it has been shown to generate a strong immune response from one dose in other vaccines. It has been genetically changed so that it is impossible for it to grow in humans. This also makes it safer to give to children, the elderly and anyone with a pre-existing condition such as diabetes. Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors are a very well-studied vaccine type, having been used safely in thousands of subjects.
Coronaviruses have club-shaped spikes on their outer coats, which form a corona – Latin for crown – on the virus surface. Immune responses from other coronavirus studies suggest that these spikes are a good target for a vacc· A vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are as· A vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic. They simply aren’t sick. The PCR test is merely picking up inactive (noninfectious) viral particles
·
In one study, which looked at pregnant women
admitted for delivery, 87.5% of the women who tested positive for the presence
of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms
·
A study looking at PCR test data from nearly 10
million residents in
·
Of the 34,424 residents with a history of
COVID-19, 107 individuals tested positive a second time, but none were
symptomatic and none were infectious
·
When asymptomatic patients were tested for
antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a
“hot” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still,
none of their contacts had been infected
asy
Dear Reader, From Robert Redfern
To Jab Or Not To Jab? What else could I write about this week?
The Prime Minister of the
Let’s get some
facts straight that you will never hear in the media before I answer, to jab or
not to jab.
1.
How can the
2.
Its trials were not due to be
reported until June 2021 but the trials were cut short. A press release
claiming a 95% success rate was released but it was not released for peer
review by independent scientists. It has not even been approved in the
3.
It is claimed that it was approved
in the
4.
Big Pharma including Pfizer has
recently been fined $30 billion for fraud, bribery, deaths of children and
other illegal activities. Hardly a trustworthy organisation!
5.
The Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation and associate companies earn fortunes from drug patents and
royalties from Big Pharma (and as a foundation avoiding tax in the
6.
It was initially reported in the
7.
Side effects of vaccines can take
months or even years to show up, which is probably why it is being tried out on
everyone working in the NHS. This particular vaccine has never been tried on
mass human populations. They may hope to hide the side effects on NHS staff but
I hope the staff are honest enough to publish serious side effects and
especially deaths.
8.
It is a BNT mRNA vaccine
containing cells grown from aborted human foetus and monkeys that interferes
with your DNA, supposedly to protect the 0.05% of the population who may die.
Of course, 99.95% who would not die from Covid-19 will be at a different risk
from taking the vaccine. No vaccines have ever been made that do not cause
death and have side effects in a %, albeit a small risk in some of them.
9.
How will we know if this or any
vaccine is effective? It is claimed to be 95% effective but since the vaccine
was not tested on the 0.05% of the 'at risk' population for effects, that is a
lie. It cannot be the PCR test as that is fake and does not indicate Covid-19.
The inventor of the PCR said so, and countless virologists and infection
experts around the world all agree. The Courts in
10.
In the
In the
11.
Importantly, Drs Wodarg and Yeadon
have started a petition to ban the vaccine due to its risk of causing
infertility in females. Read more here
12.
Lastly, the
So, to Jab or not to Jab?
So, to jab or not to jab? If you work in the NHS or care homes I
recommend you find an excuse to avoid it. If you are female and plan to ever
start a family then you must avoid the vaccine to avoid the risk of
infertility.
To the rest of the population, it is not going to be available
for around 6 months so hopefully, we will have some time to be able to make a
better-informed choice.
It may be that to see our family and grandchildren in
mptomatic. They simply aren’t sick. The PCR test is merely picking up inactive (noninfectious) viral particles
·
In one study, which looked at pregnant women
admitted for delivery, 87.5% of the women who tested positive for the presence
of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms
·
A study looking at PCR test data from nearly 10
million residents in
·
Of the 34,424 residents with a history of
COVID-19, 107 individuals tested positive a second time, but none were
symptomatic and none were infectious
·
When asymptomatic patients were tested for
antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a
“hot” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still,
none of their contacts had been infected
ine.
Adenoviruses are a group of common viruses that infect the lining of your eyes, airways and lungs, intestines, urinary tract, and nervous system. They're common causes of fever, coughs, sore throats, diarrhea, and pink eye. Infections happen in children more often than in adults, but anyone can get them.
This is the growing unrest in Australia and general violence, their special forces were reprimanded and apologised for killing Afghan civilians(see back posts) also see below ;
U.S. U.S. Pine Gap is the commonly used name for a US satellite surveillance base and Australian Earth station approximately 18 kilometres (11 mi) south-west of the town of Alice Springs, Northern Territory in the center of Australia which is jointly operated by Australia and the United States.
This more than surveillance it is widely known as another Area 51 and with the large areas of outback it is an ideal testing ground.
https://www.rt.com/news/504764-melbourne-covid19-excuses-lockdown-breaches/
A global team of experts has found 10 FATAL FLAWS in the main test for Covid and is demanding it’s urgently axed. As they should
Again and again and still they turn a blind eye. It makes me think that there is an agenda if I didn't before.
·
A vast majority of those testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 are
asymptomatic. They simply aren’t sick. The PCR test is merely picking up
inactive (noninfectious) viral particles
·
In one study, which looked at pregnant women
admitted for delivery, 87.5% of the women who tested positive for the presence
of SARS-CoV-2 had no symptoms
·
A study looking at PCR test data from nearly 10
million residents in
·
Of the 34,424 residents with a history of
COVID-19, 107 individuals tested positive a second time, but none were
symptomatic and none were infectious
·
When asymptomatic patients were tested for
antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a
“hot” or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still,
none of their contacts had been infected
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.