Hello and welcome. Well we have two multibillionaires going into space and their passengers feeling weightless for a few minutes and bank balances lighter as well. Then there is Elon Musk on the Joe Rogan Spotify interview saying you can strap a helmet with 5G phones all working to your head and it will not harm you and further more from link below. There is my take below the link and its information .
|https://www.tweaktown.com/news/70391/elon-musk-5g-medically-dangerous-land-greedy/index.html By the way it is Elon Musk saying 5G is OK. Not my take I may say.
Now for the article below and please study it carefully and its implications. My views follow.
President Biden is calling for a “new
biomedical research agency” that would operate under the guise of treatments
for chronic diseases, but which, if implemented, would merge national security
with health security
The plan would suck up masses of private data from
“Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo, and Google Home” and other consumer
electronic devices, as well as information from health care providers to
determine if an individual might be likely to commit a crime
The plan also would work toward merging “biology,
engineering and computer science to harness the power of natural systems for
national security” along with “advancements in biotechnology, supercomputing,
big data and artificial intelligence” to accomplish its goals
In the interests of national safety, the
Department of Defense wants everyone to have biometric wearables that could
monitor 165 different biomarkers using an algorithm that could “recognize an
infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms”
Ultimately, promoters of the technology want to
“develop tools to record, mark and manipulate precisely defined neurons in the
living brain” that are determined to be linked to an “abnormal” function or a
A “new” proposal by the Biden administration to create a
health-focused federal agency modeled after DARPA is not what it appears to be.
Promoted as a way to “end cancer,” this resuscitated “health DARPA” conceals a
[April 28, 2020], President Biden was widely
praised in mainstream and health-care–focused media for his call to create a
“new biomedical research agency” modeled after the U.S. military’s “high-risk,
high-reward” Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA. As touted by
the president, the agency would seek to develop “innovative” and “breakthrough”
treatments for cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes, with a call to “end
cancer as we know it.”
Far from “ending cancer” in the way most
Americans might envision it, the proposed agency would merge “national
security” with “health security” in such a way as to use both physical and
mental health “warning signs” to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence
before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic “pre-crime”
organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness
as well as “wrongthink.”
The Biden administration has asked Congress for
$6.5 billion to fund the agency, which would be largely guided by Biden’s
recently confirmed top science adviser, Eric Lander.
Lander, formerly the head of the Silicon
Valley-dominated Broad Institute, has been controversial for his ties to eugenicist and
child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his relatively recent praise for James
Watson, an overtly racist eugenicist. Despite that, Lander is set to be
confirmed by the Senate and Congress and is reportedly significantly enthusiastic
about the proposed new “health DARPA.”
This new agency, set to be called ARPA-H or
HARPA, would be housed within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and would
raise the NIH budget to over $51 billion. Unlike other agencies at NIH, ARPA-H
would differ in that the projects it funds would not be peer reviewed prior to approval;
instead, hand-picked program managers would make all funding decisions. Funding
would also take the form of milestone-driven payments instead of the more
traditional multiyear grants.
ARPA-H will likely heavily fund and promote
mRNA vaccines as one of the “breakthroughs” that will cure cancer. Some of the
mRNA vaccine manufacturers that have produced some of the most widely used
COVID-19 vaccines, such as the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, stated just last month that “cancer is the next
problem to tackle with mRNA tech” post-COVID.
BioNTech has been developing mRNA gene therapies for cancer
for years and is collaborating with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to
create mRNA-based treatments for tuberculosis and HIV. Other “innovative”
technologies that will be a focus of this agency are less well known to the
public and arguably more concerning.
The Long Road to ARPA-H
ARPA-H is not a new and exclusive Biden
administration idea; there was a previous attempt to create a “health DARPA”
during the Trump administration in late 2019. Biden began to promote the idea
during his presidential campaign as early as June 2019, albeit using a very
different justification for the agency than what had been pitched by its
advocates to Trump.
In 2019, the same foundation and individuals
currently backing Biden’s ARPA-H had urged then-President Trump to create
“HARPA,” not for the main purpose of researching treatments for cancer and
Alzheimer’s, but to stop mass shootings before they happen through the
monitoring of Americans for “neuropsychiatric” warning signs.
For the last few years, one man has been the driving force behind HARPA — former vice chair of
General Electric and former president of NBCUniversal, Robert Wright. Through
the Suzanne Wright Foundation (named for his late wife), Wright has spent years lobbying
for an agency that “would develop biomedical capabilities — detection tools,
treatments, medical devices, cures, etc. — for the millions of Americans who
are not benefiting from the current system.”
While he, like Biden, has cloaked the agency’s
actual purpose by claiming it will be mainly focused on treating cancer,
Wright’s 2019 proposal to his personal friend Donald Trump revealed its
As first proposed by Wright in 2019, the
flagship program of HARPA would be SAFE HOME, short for Stopping Aberrant Fatal Events by
Helping Overcome Mental Extremes.
SAFE HOME would suck up masses of private data
from “Apple Watches, Fitbits, Amazon Echo, and Google Home” and other consumer
electronic devices, as well as information from health care providers to
determine if an individual might be likely to commit a crime. The data would be
analyzed by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms “for early diagnosis of
The Department of Justice’s pre-crime approach known as DEEP was activated just
months before Trump left office; it was also justified as a way to “stop mass shootings
before they happen.” Soon after Biden’s inauguration, the new administration
began using information from social media to make pre-crime arrests as part of its approach toward
combating “domestic terror.”
Given the history of
The national-security applications of Robert
Wright’s HARPA are also illustrated by the man who was its lead scientific
adviser — former head of DARPA’s Biological Technologies Office Geoffrey Ling.
Not only is Ling the main scientific adviser of HARPA, but the original proposal by Wright would have Ling both
personally design HARPA and lead it once it was established.
A Plan to Merge Biology, Engineering and
Ling’s work at DARPA can be summarized by BTO’s
stated mission, which is to work toward merging “biology, engineering and computer
science to harness the power of natural systems for national security.”
BTO-favored technologies are also poised to be the mainstays of HARPA, which plans to specifically use “advancements
in biotechnology, supercomputing, big data and artificial intelligence” to
accomplish its goals.
The direct DARPA connection to HARPA
underscores that the agenda behind this coming agency dates back to the failed
Bio-Surveillance project of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program, which
was launched after the events of
TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project sought to develop the
“necessary information technologies and resulting prototype capable of
detecting the covert release of a biological pathogen automatically, and
significantly earlier than traditional approaches,” accomplishing this “by
monitoring nontraditional data sources” including “prediagnostic medical data”
and “behavioral indicators.”
While nominally focused on “bioterrorist
attacks,” TIA’s Bio-Surveillance project also sought to acquire early detection
capabilities for “normal” disease outbreaks. Bio-Surveillance and related DARPA
projects at the time, such as LifeLog, sought to harvest data through the mass
use of some sort of wearable or handheld technology.
These DARPA programs were ultimately shut down
due to the controversy over claims they would be used to profile domestic
dissidents and eliminate privacy for all Americans in the
That DARPA’s past total surveillance dragnet is
coming back to life under a supposedly separate health-focused agency, and one
that emulates its organizational model no less, confirms that many TIA-related
programs were merely distanced from the Department of Defense when officially
By separating the military from the public
image of such technologies and programs, it made them more palatable to the
masses, despite the military remaining heavily involved behind the scenes.
As Unlimited Hangout has recently reported, major aspects
of TIA were merely privatized, giving rise to companies such as Facebook and
Palantir, which resulted in such DARPA projects being widely used and accepted.
Now, under the guise of the proposed ARPA-H, DARPA’s original TIA would
essentially be making a comeback for all intents and purposes as its own
Silicon Valley, the Military and the
This most recent effort to create ARPA-H/HARPA
combines well with the coordinated push of Silicon Valley companies into the
field of health care, specifically Silicon Valley companies that double as
contractors to U.S. intelligence and/or the military (e.g., Microsoft, Google
During the COVID-19 crisis, this trend toward
One interesting example is Amazon, which
launched a wearable last year that purports to not only use biometrics to monitor
people’s physical health and fitness, but to track their emotional state as
well. The previous year, Amazon acquired the online pharmacy PillPack, and it
is not hard to imagine a scenario in which data from Amazon’s Halo wellness
band is used to offer treatment recommendations that are then supplied by
Companies such as Amazon, Palantir and Google
are set to be intimately involved in ARPA-H’s activities. In particular,
Google, which launched numerous health-tech initiatives in 2020, is set to have a
major role in this new agency due to its long-standing ties to the Obama
administration when Biden was vice president and to President Biden’s top
science adviser, Eric Lander.
As mentioned, Lander is poised to play a major
role in ARPA-H/HARPA if and when it materializes. Before becoming the top
scientist in the country, Lander was president and founding director of the
While advertised as a partnership between MIT
and Harvard, the Broad Institute is heavily
influenced by Silicon Valley, with two former Google executives
on its board, a partner of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Greylock
Partners, and the former CEO of IBM, as well as some of its top endowments coming from prominent tech executives.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, who was intimately involved with Obama’s 2012 reelection campaign and
who is close to the Democratic Party in general, chairs the Broad Institute as
of this April . In March 2021, Schmidt gave the institute $150 million to “connect biology
and machine learning for understanding programs of life.”
During his time on the Broad Institute board,
Schmidt also chaired the
National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, a group of mostly
Silicon Valley, intelligence and military operatives who have now charted the direction of the U.S.
government’s policies on emerging tech and AI. Schmidt was also pitched as potential head of a tech-industry
task force by the Biden administration.
Government and Public and Private Agencies Team
Earlier, in January , the Broad Institute announced that its health-research platform, Terra,
which was built with Google subsidiary Verily, would partner with Microsoft. As
a result, Terra now allows Google and Microsoft to access a vast
trove of genomic data that is poured into the platform by academics and
research institutions from around the world.
In addition, last September , Google
teamed up with the Department of Defense as part of a new AI-driven “predictive
health” program that also has links to the US intelligence community. While
initially focused on predicting cancer cases, this initiative clearly plans to
expand to predicting the onset of other diseases before symptoms appear,
As noted by Unlimited Hangout at the time, one of the
ulterior motives for the program, from Google’s perspective, was for Google to
gain access to “the largest repository of disease- and cancer-related medical
data in the world,” which is held by the Defense Health Agency. Having exclusive
access to this data is a huge boon for Google in its effort to develop and
expand its growing suite of AI health-care products.
The military is currently being used to pilot
COVID-19-related biometric wearables for “returning to work safely.” Last December
, it was announced that Hill Air Force Base in
According to the Air Force, these devices detect biometric indicators
that are then analyzed for 165 different biomarkers by the Defense Threat
Reduction Agency/Philips Healthcare AI algorithm that “attempts to recognize an
infection or virus around 48 hours before the onset of symptoms.”
The development of that algorithm began well before the COVID-19 crisis and is a recent
iteration of a series of military research projects that appear to have begun under the 2007
DARPA Predicting Health and Disease (PHD) project.
While of interest to the military, these
wearables are primarily intended for mass use — a big step toward the
infrastructure needed for the resurrection of a biosurveillance program to be
run by the national-security state.
Starting first with the military makes sense
from the national-security apparatus’s perspective, as the ability to monitor
biometric data, including emotions, has obvious appeal for those managing the
recently expanded “insider threat” programs in the military and the Department of Homeland Security.
One indicator of the push for mass use is that
the same Oura smart ring being used by the Air Force was also recently utilized by the NBA to prevent COVID-19 outbreaks
among basketball players.
Prior to COVID-19, it was promoted for consumer
use by members of the British Royal family and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for improving sleep. As recently as last
Monday [April 26, 2021], Oura’s CEO, Harpeet Rai, said that the entire future
of wearable health tech will soon be “proactive rather than reactive” because it will focus on
predicting disease based on biometric data obtained from wearables in real
Another wearable tied to the military that is
creeping into mass use is the BioButton and its predecessor the BioSticker.
Produced by the company BioIntelliSense, the sleek new BioButton is advertised as
a wearable system that is “a scalable and cost-effective solution for COVID-19
symptom monitoring at school, home and work.” BioIntelliSense received $2.8 million from the Pentagon last December
to develop the BioButton and BioSticker wearables for COVID-19.
BioIntelliSense, cofounded and led by former Microsoft HealthVault
developer James Mault, now has its wearable sensors being rolled out for
widespread use on some college campuses and at some
BioIntelliSense is currently running a study,
partnered with Philips Healthcare and the
While the use of these wearables is currently
“encouraged but optional” at these pilot locations, could there come a time
when they are mandated in a workplace or by a government? It would not be
unheard of, as several countries have already required foreign
arrivals to be monitored through use of a wearable during a mandatory quarantine
The Era of Digital Dictatorships Is Nearly Here
Making mandatory wearables the new normal not
just for COVID-19 prevention, but for monitoring health in general, would
institutionalize quarantining people who have no symptoms of an illness but
only an opaque algorithm’s determination that vital signs indicate “abnormal”
Given that no AI is 100% accurate and that AI
is only as good as the data it is trained on, such a system would be guaranteed
to make regular errors: The question is how many.
One AI algorithm being used to “predict
COVID-19 outbreaks” in
Adoption of these technologies has benefited
from the COVID-19 crisis, as supporters are seizing the opportunity to
accelerate their introduction. As a result, their use will soon become
ubiquitous if this advancing agenda continues unimpeded.
Though this push for wearables is obvious now,
signs of this agenda were visible several years ago. In 2018, for instance,
insurer John Hancock announced that it would replace its life insurance
offerings with “interactive policies” that involve individuals having their
health monitored by commercial health wearables.
Insurance Companies Push for ‘Fitness’
Prior to that announcement, John Hancock and
other insurers such as
In another pre-COVID example, the Journal of
the American Medical Association published an article in August 2019 that claimed that
wearables “encourage healthy behaviors and empower individuals to participate
in their health.” The authors of the article, who are affiliated with Harvard,
further claimed that “incentivizing use of these devices [wearables] by
integrating them in insurance policies” may be an “attractive” policy approach.
The use of wearables for policyholders has
since been heavily promoted by the insurance industry, both prior to and after
COVID-19, and some speculate that health insurers could soon mandate their use
in certain cases or as a broader policy.
These biometric “fitness” devices — such as
Amazon’s Halo — can monitor more than your physical vital signs, however, as
they can also monitor your emotional state. ARPA-H/HARPA’s flagship SAFE HOME
program reveals that the ability to monitor thoughts and feelings is an already
existing goal of those seeking to establish this new agency.
According to World Economic Forum luminary and
historian Yuval Noah Harari, the transition to “digital dictatorships” will
have a “big watershed” moment once governments “start
monitoring and surveying what is happening inside your body and inside your
He says that the mass adoption of such
technology would make human beings “hackable animals,” while those who abstain from having
this technology on or in their bodies would become part of a new “useless”
class. Harari has also asserted that biometric wearables will someday be used
by governments to target individuals who have the “wrong” emotional reactions
to government leaders.
Unsurprisingly, one of Harari’s biggest fans,
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, has recently led his company into the development
of a comprehensive biometric and “neural” wearable based
on technology from a “neural interface” start-up that Facebook acquired in
Per Facebook, the wearable “will integrate with
AR [augmented reality], VR [virtual reality], and human neural signals” and is
set to become commercially available soon. Facebook also notably owns the VR
company Oculus Rift, whose founder, Palmer Luckey, now runs the
As recently reported, Facebook was shaped in its early days
to be a private-sector replacement for DARPA’s controversial LifeLog program,
which sought to both “humanize” AI and build profiles on domestic dissidents
and terror suspects. LifeLog was also promoted by DARPA as “supporting medical
research and the early detection of an emerging pandemic.”
It appears that current trends and events show
that DARPA’s decadeslong effort to merge “health security” and “national security”
have now advanced further than ever before.
This may partially be because Bill Gates, who
has wielded significant influence over health policy globally in the last year,
is a long-time advocate of fusing health security and national security to
thwart both pandemics and “bioterrorists” before they can strike, as can be
heard in his 2017 speech delivered at that year’s Munich
That same year, Gates also publicly urged the
In the merging of “national security” and
“health security,” any decision or mandate promulgated as a public health
measure could be justified as necessary for “national security,” much in the
same way that the mass abuses and war crimes that occurred during the post-9/11
“war on terror” were similarly justified by “national security” with little to
Yet, in this case, instead of only losing our
civil liberties and control over our external lives, we stand to lose
sovereignty over our individual bodies.
The NIH, which would house this new
ARPA-H/HARPA, has spent hundreds of millions of dollars experimenting
with the use of wearables since 2015, not only for detecting disease symptoms
but also for monitoring individuals’ diets and illegal drug consumption.
Biden played a key part in that project, known
as the Precision Medicine initiative, and separately highlighted the use of wearables in cancer
patients as part of the Obama administration’s related Cancer Moonshot program.
A Plan to Record, Mark and Manipulate Your
The third Obama-era health research project was
the NIH’s BRAIN initiative, which was launched, among other things,
to “develop tools to record, mark and manipulate precisely defined neurons in
the living brain” that are determined to be linked to an “abnormal” function or
a neurological disease.
These initiatives took place at a time when
Eric Lander was the cochair of Obama’s Council of Advisors on
Science and Technology while still leading the Broad Institute. It is hardly a
coincidence that Eric Lander is now Biden’s top science adviser, elevated to a
new cabinet-level position and set to guide the course of ARPA-H/HARPA.
Thus, Biden’s newly announced agency, if
approved by Congress, would integrate those past Obama-era initiatives with
Orwellian applications under one roof, but with even less oversight than
before. It would also seek to expand and mainstream the uses of these
technologies and potentially move toward developing policies that would mandate
If ARPA-H/HARPA is approved by Congress and
ultimately established, it will be used to resurrect dangerous and
long-standing agendas of the national-security state and its
To find more of Webb's work, be sure to check
out her website, unlimitedhangout.com.
You can also find her videos by searching Bitchute, and she has her own podcast
channel called Unlimited Hangout on Rokfin.com. Warp Speed reporting can
also be found on thelastamericanvagabond.com. At present, Webb is also
still on Twitter
|From Files Note this was basic in 1974