Saturday 28 August 2021


 Hi Again. Trust is all well with you. Oh boy, the stiff British upper lip is quavering.

Perhaps Doctors elsewhere will copy. 

From article

A letter signed by more than 130 UK medical professionals accused UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other government officials of causing “massive, permanent and unnecessary harm” to the country.   

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the dayIt's free.

letter this week to UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other UK government officials, signed by more than 130 UK medical professionals, accused the government of mishandling its response to the COVID pandemic, resulting in “massive, permanent and unnecessary harm” to the country.

The letter, “Our Grave Concerns About the Handling of the COVID Pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK,” outlined 10 ways in which the authors argued UK government policies not only failed to protect citizens, but in many cases caused additional, unnecessary harm.

The letter’s 10 lead authors wrote:

“We write as concerned doctors, nurses and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally ‘smeared’ by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.”

The authors accused government officials of failing to measure the harms of lockdown policies, of exaggerating the virus’ threat and of improper mass testing of children.

They wrote:

“Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.”

The letter also called out officials for actively suppressing discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere, and said vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions.

The authors concluded:

“The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group — the elderly — the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children.”

In addition to Johnson, the letter was addressed to Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland; Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales; Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland; Sajid Javid, Health Secretary; Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer; and Dr. Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer.

ORDER TODAY: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.'s New Book — 'The Real Anthony Fauci'

Read the full letter:

22 August 2021

Dear Sirs and Madam,

Our grave concerns about the handling of the COVID pandemic by Governments of the Nations of the UK.

We write as concerned doctors, nurses, and other allied healthcare professionals with no vested interest in doing so. To the contrary, we face personal risk in relation to our employment for doing so and / or the risk of being personally “smeared” by those who inevitably will not like us speaking out.

We are taking the step of writing this public letter because it has become apparent to us that:

·                  The  Government (by which we mean the UK government and three devolved governments/administrations and associated government advisors and agencies such as the CMOs, CSA, SAGE, MHRA, JCVI, Public Health services, Ofcom etc, hereinafter “you” or the “Government”) have based the handling of the COVID pandemic on flawed assumptions.

·                  These have been pointed out to you by numerous individuals and organisations.

·                  You have failed to engage in dialogue and show no signs of doing so. You have removed from people fundamental rights and altered the fabric of society with little debate in Parliament. No minister responsible for policy has ever appeared in a proper debate with anyone with opposing views on any mainstream media channel.

·                  Despite being aware of alternative medical and scientific viewpoints you have failed to ensure an open and full discussion of the pros and cons of alternative ways of managing the pandemic.

·                  The pandemic response policies implemented have caused massive, permanent and unnecessary harm to our nation, and must never be repeated.

·                  Only by revealing the complete lack of widespread approval among healthcare professionals of your policies will a wider debate be demanded by the public.

In relation to the above, we wish to draw attention to the following points. Supporting references can be provided upon request.

1. No attempt to measure the harms of lockdown policies

The evidence of disastrous effects of lockdowns on the physical and mental health of the population is there for all to see. The harms are massive, widespread, and long lasting. In particular, the psychological impact on a generation of developing children could be lifelong.

It is for this reason that lockdown policies were never part of any pandemic

preparedness plans prior to 2020. In fact, they were expressly not recommended in WHO documents, even for severe respiratory viral pathogens and for that matter neither were border closures, face coverings, and testing of asymptomatic individuals. There has been such an inexplicable absence of consideration of the harms caused by lockdown policy it is difficult to avoid the suspicion that this is willful avoidance.

The introduction of such policies was never accompanied by any sort of risk/benefit analysis. As bad as that is, it is even worse that after the event when plenty of data became available by which the harms could be measured, only perfunctory attention to this aspect of pandemic planning has been afforded. Eminent professionals have repeatedly called for discourse on these health impacts in press-conferences but have been universally ignored.

What is so odd, is that the policies being pursued before mid-March 2020 (self-isolation of the ill and protection of the vulnerable, while otherwise society continued close to normality) were balanced, sensible and reflected the approach established by consensus prior to 2020. No cogent reason was given then for the abrupt change of direction from mid-March 2020 and strikingly none has been put forward at any time since.

2. Institutional nature of COVID

It was actually clear early on from Italian data that COVID (the disease, as opposed to SARS-Cov-2 infection or exposure) was largely a disease of institutions. Care home residents comprised around half of all deaths, despite making up less than 1% of the population. Hospital infections are the major driver of transmission rates as was the case for both SARS1 and MERS.

Transmission was associated with hospital contact in up to 40% of cases in the first wave in Spring 2020 and in 64% in winter 2020/2021.

Severe illness among healthy people below 70 years old did occur (as seen with flu pandemics) but was extremely rare.

Despite this, no early, aggressive and targeted measures were taken to protect care homes; to the contrary, patients were discharged without testing to homes where staff had inadequate PPE, training and information. Many unnecessary deaths were caused as a result.

Preparations for this coming winter, including ensuring sufficient capacity and preventative measures such as ventilation solutions, have not been prioritised.

3. The exaggerated nature of the threat

Policy appears to have been directed at systematic exaggeration of the number of deaths which can be attributed to COVID. Testing was designed to find every possible ‘case’ rather than focusing on clinically diagnosed infections and the resulting exaggerated case numbers fed through to the death data with large numbers of people dying ‘with COVID’ and not ‘of COVID’ where the disease was the underlying cause of death.

The policy of publishing a daily death figure meant the figure was based entirely on the PCR test result with no input from treating clinicians. By including all deaths within a time period after a positive test, incidental deaths, with but not due to COVID, were not excluded thereby exaggerating the nature of the threat.

Moreover, in headlines reporting the number of deaths, a categorisation by age was not included. The average age of a COVID-labelled death is 81 for men and 84 for women, higher than the average life expectancy when these people were born.

This is a highly relevant fact in assessing the societal impact of the pandemic. Death in old age is a natural phenomenon. It cannot be said that a disease primarily affecting the elderly is the same as one which affects all ages, and yet the government’s messaging appears designed to make the public think that everyone is at equal risk.

Doctors were asked to complete death certificates in the knowledge that the deceased’s death had already been recorded as a COVID death by the Government. Since it would be virtually impossible to find evidence categorically ruling out COVID as a contributory factor to death, once recorded as a “COVID death” by the government, it was inevitable that it would be included as a cause on the death certificate.

Diagnosing the cause of death is always difficult and the reduction in post mortems will have inevitably resulted in increased inaccuracy. The fact that deaths due to non-COVID causes actually moved into a substantial deficit (compared to average) as COVID-labelled deaths rose (and this was reversed as COVID-labelled deaths fell) is striking evidence of over-attribution of deaths to COVID.

The overall all-cause mortality rate from 2015-2019 was unusually low and yet these figures have been used to compare to 2020 and 2021 mortality figures which has made the increased mortality appear unprecedented. Comparisons with data from earlier years would have demonstrated that the 2020 mortality rate was exceeded in every year prior to 2003 and is unexceptional as a result.

Even now COVID cases and deaths continue to be added to the existing total without proper rigour such that overall totals grow ever larger and exaggerate the threat. No effort has been made to count totals in each winter season separately which is standard practice for every other disease.

You have continued to adopt high-frequency advertising through publishing and broadcast media outlets to add to the impact of “fear messaging”. The cost of this has not been widely published, but government procurement websites reveal it to be immense — hundreds of millions of pounds.

The media and government rhetoric is now moving onto the idea that “Long Covid” is going to cause major morbidity in all age groups including children, without having a discussion of the normality of postviral fatigue which lasts upwards of 6 months. This adds to the public fear of the disease, encouraging vaccination amongst those who are highly unlikely to suffer any adverse effects from COVID.

4. Active suppression of discussion of early treatment using protocols being successfully deployed elsewhere

The harm caused by COVID and our response to it should have meant that advances in prophylaxis and therapeutics for COVID were embraced. However, evidence on successful treatments has been ignored or even actively suppressed.

For example, a study in Oxford published in February 2021 demonstrated that inhaled Budesonide could reduce hospitalisations by 90% in low risk patients and a publication in April 2021 showed that recovery was faster for high risk patients too. However, this important intervention has not been promoted.

Dr. Tess Lawrie, of the Evidence Based Medical Consultancy in Bath, presented a thorough analysis of the prophylactic and therapeutic benefits of Ivermectin to the government in January 2021. More than 24 randomised trials with 3,400 people have demonstrated a 79-91% reduction in infections and a 27-81% reduction in deaths with Ivermectin.

Many doctors are understandably cautious about possible over-interpretation of the available data for the drugs mentioned above and other treatments, although it is to be noted that no such caution seems to have been applied in relation to the treatment of data around the government’s interventions (eg the effectiveness of lockdowns or masks) when used in support of the government’s agenda.

Whatever one’s view on the merits of these repurposed drugs, it is totally unacceptable that doctors who have attempted to merely open discussion about the potential benefits of early treatments for COVID have been heavily and inexplicably censored. Knowing that early treatments which could reduce the risk of requiring hospitalisation might be available would alter the entire view held by many professionals and lay people alike about the threat posed by COVID, and therefore the risk / benefit ratio for vaccination, especially in younger groups.

5. Inappropriate and unethical use of behavioural science to generate unwarranted fear

Propagation of a deliberate fear narrative (confirmed through publicly accessible government documentation) has been disproportionate, harmful and counterproductive. We request that it should cease forthwith.

To give just one example, the government’s face covering policies seem to have been driven by behavioural psychology advice in relation to generating a level of fear necessary for compliance with other policies.

Those policies do not appear to have been driven by reason of infection control, because there is no robust evidence showing that wearing a face covering (particularly cloth or standard surgical masks) is effective against transmission of airborne respiratory pathogens such as SARS-Cov-2.

Several high profile institutions and individuals are aware of this and have advocated against face coverings during this pandemic only inexplicably to reverse their advice on the basis of no scientific justification of which we are aware. On the other hand there is plenty of evidence suggesting that mask wearing can cause multiple harms, both physical and mental.

This has been particularly distressing for the nation’s school children who have been encouraged by government policy and their schools to wear masks for long periods at school.

Finally, the use of face coverings is highly symbolic and thus counterproductive in making people feel safe. Prolonged wearing risks becoming an ingrained safety behaviour, actually preventing people from getting back to normal because they erroneously attribute their safety to the act of mask wearing rather than to the remote risk, for the vast majority of healthy people under 70 years old, of catching the virus and becoming seriously unwell with COVID.

6. Misunderstanding of the ubiquitous nature of mutations of newly emergent viruses

The mutation of any novel virus into newer strains — especially when under selection pressure from abnormal restrictions on mixing and vaccination — is normal, unavoidable and not something to be concerned about. Hundreds of thousands of mutations of the original Wuhan strain have already been identified.

Chasing down every new emergent variant is counterproductive, harmful and totally unnecessary and there is no convincing evidence that any newly identified variant is any more deadly than the original strain.

Mutant strains appear simultaneously in different countries (by way of ‘convergent evolution’) and the closing of national borders in attempts to prevent variants travelling from one country to another serves no significant infection control purpose and should be abandoned.

7. Misunderstanding of asymptomatic spread and its use to promote public compliance with restrictions

It is well-established that asymptomatic spread has never been a major driver of a respiratory disease pandemic and we object to your constant messaging implying this, which should cease forthwith.

Never before have we perverted the centuries-old practice of isolating the ill by instead isolating the healthy. Repeated mandates to healthy, asymptomatic people to self-isolate, especially school children, serves no useful purpose and has only contributed to the widespread harms of such policies.

In the vast majority of cases healthy people are healthy and cannot transmit the virus and only sick people with symptoms should be isolated.

The government’s claim that one in three people could have the virus has been shown to be mutually inconsistent with the ONS data on prevalence of disease in society, and the sole effect of this messaging appears to have been to generate fear and promote compliance with government restrictions.

The government’s messaging to ‘act as if you have the virus’ has also been unnecessarily fear-inducing given that healthy people are extremely unlikely to transmit the virus to others.

The PCR test, widely used to determine the existence of ‘cases’, is now indisputably acknowledged to be unable reliably to detect infectiousness. The test cannot discriminate between those in whom the presence of fragments of genetic material partially matching the virus is either incidental (perhaps because of past infection), or is representative of active infection, or is indicative of infectiousness.

Yet, it has been used almost universally without qualification or clinical diagnosis to justify lockdown policies and to quarantine millions of people needlessly at enormous cost to health and well-being and to the country’s economy.

Countries that have removed community restrictions have seen no negative consequences which can be attributed to the easing. Empirical data from many countries demonstrates that the rise and fall in infections is seasonal and not due to restrictions or face coverings.

The reason for reduced impact of each successive wave is that: (1) most people have some level of immunity either through prior immunity or immunity acquired through exposure; (2) as is usual with emergent new viruses, mutation of the virus towards strains causing milder disease appears to have occurred.

Vaccination may also contribute to this although its durability and level of protection against variants is unclear.

The government appears to be talking of “learning to live with COVID” while apparently practicing by stealth a “zero COVID” strategy which is futile and ultimately net-harmful.

8. Mass testing of healthy children

Repeated testing of children to find asymptomatic cases who are unlikely to spread virus, and treating them like some sort of biohazard is harmful, serves no public health purpose and must stop.

During Easter term, an amount equivalent to the cost of building one District General Hospital was spent weekly on testing schoolchildren to find a few thousand positive ‘cases’, none of which was serious as far as we are aware.

Lockdowns are in fact a far greater contributor to child health problems, with record levels of mental illness and soaring levels of non-COVID infections being seen, which some experts consider to be a result of distancing resulting in deconditioning of the immune system.

9. Vaccination of the entire adult population should never have been a prerequisite for ending restrictions

Based merely on early “promising” vaccine data, it is clear that the Government decided in summer 2020 to pursue a policy of viral suppression within the entire population until vaccination was available (which was initially stated to be for the vulnerable only, then later changed — without proper debate or rigorous analysis — to the entire adult population).

This decision was taken despite massive harms consequent to continued lockdowns which were either known to you or ought to have been ascertained so as to be considered in the decision making process.

Moreover, a number of principles of good medical practice and previously unimpeachable ethical standards have been breached in relation to the vaccination campaign, meaning that in most cases, whether the consent obtained can be truly regarded as “fully informed” must be in serious doubt:

·                  The use of coercion supported by an unprecedented media campaign to persuade the public to be vaccinated, including threats of discrimination, either supported by the law or encouraged socially, for example in co-operation with social media platforms and dating apps.

·                  The omission of information permitting individuals to make a fully informed choice, especially in relation to the experimental nature of the vaccine agents, extremely low background COVID risk for most people, known occurrence of short-term side-effects and unknown long-term effects.

Finally, we note that the Government is seriously considering the possibility that these vaccines — which have no associated long-term safety data — could be administered to children on the basis that this might provide some degree of protection to adults. We find that notion an appalling and unethical inversion of the long-accepted duty falling on adults to protect children.

10. Over-reliance on modeling while ignoring real-world data

Throughout the pandemic, decisions seem to have been taken utilising unvalidated models produced by groups who have what can only be described as a woeful track record, massively overestimating the impact of several previous pandemics.

The decision-making teams appear to have very little clinical input and, as far as is ascertainable, no clinical immunology expertise.

Moreover, the assumptions underlying the modeling have never been adjusted to take into account real-world observations in the UK and other countries.

It is an astonishing admission that, when asked whether collateral harms had been considered by SAGE, the answer given was that it was not in their remit — they were simply asked to minimise COVID impact. That might be forgivable if some other advisory group was constantly studying the harms side of the ledger, yet this seems not to have been the case.


The UK’s approach to COVID has palpably failed. In the apparent desire to protect one vulnerable group — the elderly — the implemented policies have caused widespread collateral and disproportionate harm to many other vulnerable groups, especially children.

Moreover your policies have failed in any event to prevent the UK from notching up one of the highest reported death rates from COVID in the world.

Now, despite very high vaccination rates and the currently very low COVID death and hospitalisation rates, policy continues to be aimed at maintaining a population handicapped by extreme fear with restrictions on everyday life prolonging and deepening the policy-derived harms.

To give just one example, NHS waiting lists now stand at 5.1m officially, with — according to the previous Health Secretary — a likely further 7m who will require treatment not yet presented. This is unacceptable and must be addressed urgently.

In short, there needs to be a sea change within the Government which must now pay proper attention to those esteemed experts outside its inner circle who are sounding these alarms.

As those involved with healthcare, we are committed to our oath to “first do no harm”, and we can no longer stand by in silence observing policies which have imposed a series of supposed “cures” which are in fact far worse than the disease they are supposed to address.

The signatories of this letter call on you, in Government, without further delay to widen the debate over policy, consult openly with groups of scientists, doctors, psychologists and others who share crucial, scientifically-valid and evidence-based alternative views and to do everything in your power to return the country as rapidly as possible to normality with the minimum of further damage to society.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Jonathan Engler, MB ChB LLB (Hons) DipPharmMed

Professor John A Fairclough, BM BS B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM,  Consultant Surgeon, ran vaccination program for a Polio Outbreak, Past President BOSTA, for Orthopaedic Surgeons, Faculty member FFSEM

Mr. Tony Hinton, MB ChB, FRCS, FRCS(Oto), Consultant Surgeon

Dr. Renee Hoenderkamp, BSc (Hons) MBBS MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr. Ros Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Mr. Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB MD FRCSEd FRCS (Gen Surg) MIHM VR

Dr. Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician

Dr. Alan Mordue, MB ChB, FFPH (ret), Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine

Mr. Colin Natali, BSc(Hons), MBBS FRCS FRCS(Orth), Consultant Spine Surgeon

Dr. Helen Westwood, MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Click here, for the complete list of signatories.

Subscribe to The Defender - It’s Free!


 Mr Boris Johnson, Prime Minister

Ms Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister for Scotland

Mr Mark Drakeford, First Minister for Wales

Mr Paul Givan, First Minister for Northern Ireland

Mr Sajid Javid, Health Secretary

Dr Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer

Dr Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Officer


22 August 2021 Sent as above.

Be Well



from back blogs

PCR Tests.

1.3 The Validity of RT-PCR Tests Is Highly Questionable

I’ve addressed these problems in length in my last article — but in the last few weeks I’ve seen several additional indications that the tests we’re using to detect COVID are extremely prone to error. Here are a few key examples:

A) The RT-PCR test shouldn’t be used to diagnose a disease in the first place.

At least that’s what Kary Mullis, the scientist who happened to invent the RT-PCR test and received a Nobel prize because of it, argues:
‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.’ PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves. [emphasis mine]
To be clear: The RT-PCR test does not and cannot detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, but a specific RNA section that is thought to be specific to SARS-CoV-2. It does not and cannot assess the viral load — how much virus is in someone’s blood. It does not and cannot demonstrate that the presence of a virus has caused a certain disease, or certain symptoms. It does not and cannot be used alone to diagnose any disease.
As pointed out by the nonprofit organization Swiss Propaganda Research, American diagnostic manufacturer Creative Diagnostics even specifies that “the detection result of this [COVID-19 test] is only for clinical reference, and it should not be used as the only evidence for clinical diagnosis and treatment.”
This flies in the face of the WHO’s definition of what a “confirmed case” of COVID is, which they define as “a person with laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 infection, irrespective of clinical signs and symptoms.” [emphasis mine]
In other words, the WHO — and governments worldwide who follow their lead — are perfectly comfortable with the idea of using a test which should technically never be used for diagnostic purposes… to diagnose COVID.

B) Dozens of different RT-PCR tests are being used, each with slightly different definitions of what constitutes a “positive case” of COVID.

Canadian independent researcher of infectious disease models David Crowe has analyzed the instruction manuals of 33 different PCR tests approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). What he found was so confusing that he ended up poetically describing them as a “Potpourri of tests”.
This gets technical, but some clear examples of discrepancies include:
  • Most tests use a different number of PCR cycles to distinguish what is considered a “positive” from a “negative” result.
One manufacturer each recommended 30 cycles, 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39. 40 was the most popular, chosen by 12 manufacturers, and two recommended 43 and 45. The MIQE (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative RT-PCR Experiments) guidelines for operation and reporting of RT-PCR states that the use of 40 or more cycles is unwise.
Crowe recently interviewed Stephen Bustin, a professor at Anglia Ruskin University in the UK — who’s arguably the world’s top expert on quality control of RT-PCR. Bustin said that he doesn’t think that more than 35 PCR cycles should ever be used. Crowe concluded that “the majority of COVID-19 RT-PCR tests approved by the FDA may be pushing RT-PCR to its limits or beyond”.
  • The amount of DNA extracted from a patient’s sample can vary widely.
PCR tests can only be performed on DNA, which means that the RNA extracted from a patient’s saliva, respiratory tract tissue or stools needs to be converted into cDNA (complementary DNA) through a process that is unfortunately “quite inefficient”.
Stephen Bustin admitted that “the amount of DNA obtained [from this conversion] can vary widely, easily by a factor of 10.”
Crowe grudgingly concludes that:
Since the PCR cycle number is a measure of the amount of material obtained, different efficiencies essentially invalidate the simple use of the PCR cycle number. Two different test setups in two different labs, that both use the PCR cycle number 35 as a cutoff, may actually have the cutoff between negative and positive at wildly different places. [emphasis mine]
  • Most tests have a different definition of what they’re actually looking for.
As I mentioned previously, the RT-PCR test cannot identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself, but can identify the presence of the tiny fraction of its genetic sequence that is currently thought to be specific to SARS-CoV-2, and different from other coronaviruses.
Crowe explains that the definition of what constitutes this “specific” genetic sequence varies widely from test to test: 
A test developed by Charité Berlin (not on the FDA list) looks for the RdRp and E genes, which amount to 213 base pairs out of about 30,000 for the entire genome, or less than one percent.
On the FDA list, the tests reference the E, N and S genes and portions of the ORF (Open Reading Frame). What is most important to know is not what the function of these RNA segments is, but simply that the tests are looking for very different things. [emphasis mine] It is as if we went looking for leopards with one person using spots as the guide, another the claws, another the teeth and another the eyes.
You know where I’m going with this, and yes, it does get worse. Read on:
Worse than differences in what they are looking for is the way of defining whether they have found it. [emphasis mine] Some tests look for one portion that must be present for the test to be declared positive. Others look for two portions and both must be positive, while others only require one of the two to be positive. Some tests look for three portions, and generally only require two to be detected, although one test requires all three.
If your head is buzzing already with all the technical jargon, simply understand that this means all 33 FDA-approved tests have widely ranging definitions of what constitutes a “confirmed case” of COVID.

C) The RT-PCR tests can react with other coronaviruses, including coronaviruses commonly found in other animals.

On April 22nd, the CDC announced that COVID had been identified in two cats in New York City. The virus had been found in zoo tigersdogs, and other cats in Belgium and China
While a lot of people feared that these new findings meant that the virus could now spread through household pets, the CDC stressed that “at this time, there is no evidence that animals play a significant role in spreading the virus that causes COVID-19” and that “based on the limited information available to date, the risk of animals spreading COVID-19 to people is considered to be low.”
According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, who’s been a vocal critic against our reaction to COVID (he has coined the term “corona-panic” in my opinion) in the last several months, the fact that COVID is found in animals is a definite proof that COVID tests are not specific enough, and are wrongly flagging other coronaviruses as “COVID-19”.
LOGS THERE ARE EXTENSIVE REPORTS ON masks, viruses, vaccinations (with an explanation and scientific proof they spread viruses) THIS IS JUST TWO OF THE REPORTS YOU CAN GET TO ADD TO THE ABOVE AND LETTER.
Should this in time and allowed to be taken up it will show that; vaccines spread viruses, so we are mass vaccinating and so more viral impact. SO those that are unvaccinated are in danger to be standing near a vaccinated masked person. THE COMPLETE REVERSE TO MANY THINKERS AND GOVERMANETAL POLICIES AND PAID GOVERNMENT SCIENTIFIC PAID SCIENTISTS. 
On Masks one of several 

Monday, 28 December 2020 Blog

This link goes into the horrifying data about nostrils of the unvaxed and vaxed amongst other nearly important issuses;

Robert F. Kennedy Jr




A preprint paper by the prestigious Oxford University Clinical Research Group, published Aug. 10 in The Lancet, found vaccinated individuals carry 251 times the load of COVID-19 viruses in their nostrils compared to the unvaccinated.

 There is a disclaimer trying to say its fake ------however if you read my POST  on the Universities who found 'vaccinations cause the spread of viruses it backs it up. 

True, CV 19 does not exist--has not been isolated and completed Koch's Postulates, but neither has any "flu" either--no virus has been successfully isolated. Cold and flu symptoms are just chemical toxic exposure. I use one plant-based cleaner soap for dishes, laundry, and a floor/bathroom cleaner and I never get cold/flu symptoms. Chemical cleaners are everywhere and most are toxic as are pesticides which caused polio--DDT in the 50's and before that lead/arsenate pesticide formula gave people polio--as did polio vaccines which did not eradicate "poliomyelitis" that never existed.

Dr. Robert Young, PhD-- CDC admits no viruses exist.
No one has ever isolated, purified and/or scientifically verified and proven the existence of any and all viruses at any time, at any place, anywhere in the world!

Friday 27 August 2021


 Hi welcome

A short One;

The World We Live in blog;

Brilliant! How Russians Crushed Moscow’s Dumb Vaccine Passports In Just 3 Weeks

From Article

Are we in the WEST Brave enough. WHAT STAND NEXT TO  an non vaccine person!!!!!!?

Be Well 


Yes I know I am hypocrite and did get the jabs when I said I wouldn't but I have and do stand and visit non jabbed and although at my age 82 I already being texted by my GP to have a booster and flu jab I will turn them down, I am still suffering from the second jab; short of breath, stiff aching joints, burning headaches and a lack of energy, really constant fatigue and more and this was from June 19.

I regret having the jabs. 

Tuesday 17 August 2021


 I started to write a blog and my dyslexia did not seem the same as always and I discarded it six times. I  apologise I did not greet you , Welcome and a heartfelt welcome.


                      Courtesy You. Gov

I originally did a whole thing with Fauci and the Founder of the mRNA disputing over the efficacy even of his invention (Robert Malone claims to have invented mRNA technology. Why is he trying so hard to undermine its use?) Then mask or not mask to world wide renowned professors disputing the use of masks. THEN the USA having more Covid and other countries or not-not. Then we have the fact that the two shots of Moderna and Pfizer have now been allocated a 42% effectiveness against the Delta variant and it is suggested boosters are now needed. Then Ofxord AstraZeneca vaccine that caused all the hoo-ha is now rated as 75% effective but the Russian V which has not been approved by the EU and other agencies, I feel because of Political and one sneeze or gold winning by a RRRRUSSIAN athlete fake  or not quite right, scored as by independent labs as 89% against Delta variant and millions have been given the two doses ---profit and politics before people and health with well being. 

Then the USA leaving Afghanistan; the pictures of the fall of three main cities and the bombing and desolation is heart breaking  and pitiful to watch. So how to make sense of this double, triple messages and duplicity.
All over the world, scientists, governments, corporations and consumers are collaborating to turn the Earth into a giant computer, fulfilling the warning predictions of the great Swedish physicist and Nobel laureate Hannes Alfvén. Written under the pen name Olof Johannesson, his 1966 science fiction novel Sagan om den stora datamaskinen (The Tale of the Great Computer) predicted smart phones, the internet, fitbits, artificial intelligence, chip implants enabling direct human-to-computer communication, the colonization of Mars, and ultimately the replacement of humankind entirely by computers, which regarded human beings as just one step on the evolutionary path to themselves.
Elon Musk in a Joe Rogan interview said( in my words you can strap six cell 5G phones to your head and it will not damage you , well now try with 6G) 
Courtesy The Conversation

The media publish disputes between scientists but not INDIVIDUAL scientists who go against the 'official narrative'. This is because you have to choose between which scientist is correct or not. An individual is fake or false and  harming  people and I ASK is the official narrative not harming? After all denying Russian Sputnik V or the Chinese vaccine to millions at a cheaper prices than others can only suggest Political or Profit motive.  This is fuelled by the not so independent media and to add other media names to image above.

Hunter Biden tells prostitute in video he lost ANOTHER laptop containing 'crazy sex' footage, blames the Russians – media


To  Geoff Freed  

Around 60 percent of cases of Covid were caught in care homes for the elderly or in hospital, and not in the general population.  

These alarming figures represented a failure of care and preparation, such as the lack of proper PPE equipment, but they weren’t lessons learned.  During the first wave, around 11 percent of cases were caught in hospital, but this doubled in the second wave that peaked around last May.

Dr Chris Green, one of the research team, explained that there were a number of reasons for the high infection rate in care homes and hospitals, from limited facilities for case isolation, no rapid and reliable diagnostic testing in the early stages, poor or no PPE equipment, and a failure to understand the way Covid was spread.

(Source: Lancet, 2021;doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736) 

Courtesy Fanzine
The countless cases I witnessed as the forensic investigations went on, the SILENCE OF DEATH, the mourning of the relatives or loved left behind or the lusting revenge by the perpetrator's or even in accidents, the Alzheimer's who one knew before their personalities vanished, slowly or rapidly, all pose this great conundrum 'who really am I? some use it as a spiritual process. 

Courtesy QUORA 
   My two mentors a Sensei and  Sifu gave me wisdom and hints, My Sensei a Koan to which I have related many POST's back and in SHACK's and Sifu a practical living worldly example. However this was compounded by the empty atom and quantum stuff and then my many presentations in workshops and the look on many faces when I went into the following and many readers will be familiar and fed up with, however as this maybe my last POST I will deliver it again; 

Courtesy Depositphotos

As a fetus grows, it's constantly getting messages from its mother. It's not just hearing her heartbeat and whatever music she might play to her belly; it also gets chemical signals through the placenta. A new study finds that this includes signals about the mother's mental state.
I witnessed many uterine connections with the foetus and visitors, doctors and so on; so it is my summary that the foetus 'picks up feelings which are imprinted in its nervous system and then when it is born IT has the impressions which it does not understand because it is not able to discern or discriminate, accept it has basic elementary feelings; feels OK and sort of safe or no and cry. Stamp 1) sound is heard over and over again and like a puppy it is a blur, a noise. then an association begins to form that sound is my name, me Geoff )puppy Chum) STAMP 2) Family traditions and ethos  Stamp3)  Religion and Education, then various stamps, business, Country political and because the mind is growing and is open to inculcation one just follows THE RAILWAY lines and maybe never questions its brain washing no matter how loving or nastiness.

Courtesy YOU TUBE
Comes the day and an awakening of some sort; a death witnessed, who was my grandma before she went senile, an accident, perhaps a questioning on reality or some such, it can be anything. HEY I am not really me HUH, I was taught to be me --mostly, I am not an original, I am clone of my parents and their tradition, I am second hand clothing. I am not original, well maybe in fashion, joining a cult, part of the Woke or gender problems ACTUALLY all the others I know including atheists or whatever's are the same as me 'brain washed' whether one insists I am not, even that is brain washing. BRAVE ones may swap their religion, their habits and come to realise that by fate of mystical design and plan I could have been anyone of many religions and inculcated indeed PERSONALITIES OF MY OLD GRANNY BEFORE ALZHEIMERS were just belief systems and programmes and agendas see You Tube image above. THE SHOCK all I am is a set of handed down ideas that are swappable. SO WHO AM I? 

Courtesy Alamy Stock Photo
So if I am not brain washed into some sort of 'IDENTITY' and this suggest I am identity-less I then become a zombie, I become like the empty atom, 99,99% empty and that is another mystery how from empty atoms did the Universe and I arrive, perhaps I better find out 'who am I am not before I find out the Universe is not as real,' AS I THOGUTH I WAS. My late cousin Professor Cyril Woolf told me that when they split the atom many physicist's had this problem and this prompted Fritzof Capra to write his first edition of the DAO OF PHYSICS, the later ones in my view were not as ' meditative'. I started a meditation group for scientists which I named 'SAM' sub atomic meditation any other title would have put them off--(big ego Geoff ).
ALL WARS, RELATIONSHIP PROBLEMS stem from brain washing against brain washing. IF ONE Realised the emptiness of brain washed idealism and FOUND OUT reaching the empty mind as it were does not lead one to a psychotic, numbed bored, shabby, mumbling, shuffling nincompoop, unwashed bald or long haired homeless or not out of work or in work with a bored empty fruitless life, suicidal, depressed, addicted to something or other then-----TRY IT>

When one fully and utterly realises this  whether one has a Guru, self realisation growth work, shock, accident or whatever and whenever  even an intellectual, even logical reasoned breakdown with a really open mind to really and truly get to the bottom and strip away all beliefs and their origins, it can be scary and daunting and needs great courage to pursue and 'get to the bottom of it' I have seen philosopher's, great psychologists, great meditators and workshop leaders, shamanic practitioners, healers, religious folk, shy away just at the touch and awesome reality that there is NO REALITY ONLY MY BELIEFS AND IDEAS AND FURTHERMORE I HAVE NO real IDENTITY ----ALL THESE ARE JUST BELEIFS THAT ARE HANDED DOWN AND TAUGHT TO ME. YES I can vehemently deny I AM NOT BRAIN WASHED OR A ROBOTICALLY organic INCULCATED  being, I make up my own mind---really based on brain washed software and this is the base and core and modified to suit the challenge.
So the shock of realising this, really, really, really this I have seen the greatest writers, or read about them great huge minds baulk at the final hurdle, the finishing line and either commit suicide, become raving lunatics, become addicted to about anything THAT relieves the horror of the not me. Those that survive and go through become like the video below and even then I will comment after the video;    
I got this video from a recommendation from a dear friend who heard what happened to me; I have written about this in SHACK and back POSTS; I was in the bathroom drying my hands after food preparation when and like Dennis it happened, I laughed for three days, my neighbours heard me and I could not speak and my ribs were really hurting, they said they would call the police and my doctor as they thought I was having a fit or something. I left home and went to stay with a friend who sent me the video and for two days at her home we both laughed and cried and shrieked for she had, had the same experience. 
My neighbours and friends will witness this. HOWEVER this is not enlightenment, for I feel enlightenment is a misnomer---this is the start of LIVING WITH THIS NO IDENTITY, the ego and the world ethos will tempt one back and one has to 'stay' or realise this and there is a sort of 'inner intuitive prompt'  instinctively realises this is not me. Many Zen monks experienced the above and went to live in seclusion and became hermits for a while or for the rest of their lives and they said they wanted to be with this realisation and not be lured back. 
It seems pointless to write or share anymore blogs yet I will write and have written in SHACK more about the above and my meditative experience. The virus, the wars, the vaccinations, all born out of some minds to manipulate nature god given genes, food, air and water. One religion and morals against another, my view and some else's and the ego to deny, defend, attack and justify myself. And this self is it definable and original NO. IT IS MERELY IDEAS WHICH FILL THE gap OF A MADE UP everybody's  yearning to be a real and solid person and in truth no such persons ACTUALLY Exists. 

We are all ideas and not real as such because ideas and beliefs are malleable, pliable, plastic and shapeless and all trying to be somebody and swap personal ties if one chooses. and no matter what new inventive and innovative you become, you take on like me when you realise you are an Idea and really that is you no matter how much you juxtapose, reconfigure and upgrade they are just ideas concocted out of mind graphics and one is merely trying to assert ones agenda and the more one tries then layers of belief add more strata to the false identity and the more difficult to find ones true self --that is the non identifiable you. AND the more emptier one becomes, the more joy, peace and love flow in and you may wonder like the dog chasing its tail what a waste of time its all been.  However that time spent wisely led one to the 'dismantling the scaffold' that was one you / me / us. Death can do this unless you believe in reincarnation. Is reincarnation another ploy to resuscitate or resurrect the unfinished shedding of the layers. HAVE we the worlds Humanity really eliminated UNFINISHED BUSINESS?  

from a Geoff

Be Well. 

Courtesy  Quora
SO are we you / us/ everything really here? Is it worth worrying of fighting over ideas which like the atom has no real substance?
Atoms are not mostly empty space because there is no such thing as purely empty space. Rather, space is filled with a wide variety of particles and fields. ... Even if we ignore every kind of field and particle except electrons, protons and neutrons, we find that atoms are still not empty. Atoms are filled with electrons.12 Jan 2013
Electrons are fundamental particles so they cannot be decomposed into constituents. 
The electron is a subatomic particle, (denoted by the symbol 
), whose electric charge is negative one elementary charge.[9] Electrons belong to the first generation of the lepton particle family,[10] and are generally thought to be elementary particles because they have no known components or substructure.[1] The electron has a mass that is approximately 1/1836 that of the proton.[11] Quantum mechanical properties of the electron include an intrinsic angular momentum (spin) of a half-integer value, expressed in units of the reduced Planck constantħ. Being fermions, no two electrons can occupy the same quantum state, in accordance with the Pauli exclusion principle.[10] Like all elementary particles, electrons exhibit properties of both particles and waves: they can collide with other particles and can be diffracted like light. The wave properties of electrons are easier to observe with experiments than those of other particles like neutrons and protons because electrons have a lower mass and hence a longer de Broglie wavelength for a given energy.
Any attempt to measure precisely the velocity of a subatomic particle, such as an electron, will knock it about in an unpredictable way, so that a simultaneous measurement of its position has no validity. This result has nothing to do with inadequacies in the measuring instruments, the technique, or the observer; it arises out of the intimate connection in nature between particles and waves in the realm of subatomic dimensions.

who am I WHO ARE WE?

Physicists are made of atoms. A physicist is an attempt by an atom to understand itself.”

Michio Kaku
SO when we look at atoms we are looking at ourselves. Have you really got the message as to who we are? Geoff.

Much ado about Nothing. Shakespeare