Hi and welcome. I apologise if this image above is abhorrent because in the courtesy to My Modern Art the word Met to me describes what is going on with Police Act and its more powers voting in parliament in the UK and its looking like and similar too the USA(https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/894/text?) and the Patriot Bill.
Its a bit late now and like all other countries whilst the general public suffered and cowered about masks and lockdowns and vaccines(which I have tried one jab to see if I can detox it--so far no joy--will not have the booster) and we have been given the message that deprived of liberty over lock downs, fined over gathering or not six feet apart and fined for not mask wearing its too late because the majority have given in and that makes those who not comply seen as conspiracy theory nuts, right wing or any other wing cultists and terrorists, fascists and any other label.
He is right in his words and the vaccine investors chemical companies are drowning in profits. What's for lunch.
I bet that's not what he had in mind (me) Courtesy Twitter
This is the best video I have come across that explains in simple and graphic terms how the immune and vaccine work, It is this and the fact that the lab tests on me confirmed what he says that will make me not take the second jab---unless we have a detox in the lab to annul it.
Dominic Raab was speaking
‘candidly’ to civil servants, the Foreign Office permanent secretary said. Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images
This is the sort of double and treble standards----the phrase we can deal with countries with lower standards of human rights is OK as we are in a better position to talk with them and suggest better rights for all ----hasn't done a thing for Saudi Arabia committing genocide on Yemen and GB supplying arms for years. Hypocrisy, nah just money and greed---by the way get vaccinated and wear five masks and yes Chris Whitty has hinted there will be a rise in Covid near the end of the year ---more vaccines and you liar because the flu season begins then---and the general public will mask up and mess themselves and the fear of more lock downs and the government fearing civil unrest bring in the draconian new Police Act.
When you read this you will be horrified. Yes it is the same old historic abuse by Catholic Priests and if you read the side panels which are articles in themselves you will see what the Nuns have got up too. I hope they get vaccinated, keep their distance and wear masks (condoms). What's this double masks, six feet apart and sexual distancing and triple condoms, my, my, makes it a bit difficult I might say. By the way why aren't they not prosecuted for breaking the Covid rules as well.
This Act may be cited as the ``Space Preservation Act of 2001''.
SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the
National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating
that it ``is the policy of the United States that activities in space
should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all
mankind.''.
SEC. 3. PERMANENT BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE.
The President shall--
(1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the
United States and remove from space any existing space-based
weapons of the United States; and
(2) immediately order the permanent termination of research
and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and
deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and
their components.
SEC. 4. WORLD AGREEMENT BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the
United Nations and other international organizations to immediately
work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement
banning space-based weapons.
SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after
the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a
report on--
(1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based
weapons required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing
the agreement described in section 4.
SEC. 6. NON SPACE-BASED WEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of
funds for--
(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not
related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including
communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early
warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based
weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:
(1) The term ``space'' means all space extending upward
from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface
of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2)(A) The terms ``weapon'' and ``weapons system'' mean a
device capable of any of the following:
(i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in
outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(I) firing one or more projectiles to
collide with that object;
(II) detonating one or more explosive
devices in close proximity to that object;
(III) directing a source of energy
(including molecular or atomic energy,
subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic
radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency
(ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy
radiation) against that object; or
(IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet
undeveloped means.
(ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or
destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily
health, mental health, or physical and economic well-
being of a person)--
(I) through the use of any of the means
described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
(II) through the use of land-based, sea-
based, or space-based systems using radiation,
electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or
other energies directed at individual persons
or targeted populations for the purpose of
information war, mood management, or mind
control of such persons or populations; or
(III) by expelling chemical or biological
agents in the vicinity of a person.
(B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
(i) electronic, psychotronic, or information
weapons;
(ii) chemtrails;
(iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons
systems;
(iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic
weapons;
(v) laser weapons systems;
(vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or
extraterrestrial weapons; and
(vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate,
or tectonic weapons.
(C) The term ``exotic weapons systems'' includes weapons
designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the
ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and
tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or
destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in
space.
<all>
These above can be found in; Space Media Net work, Space Dailey.com Space War.com ---One can subscribe free to their newsletters and for the technically minded and gadgets with latest exotic weaponry and surveillance they are gems for me they sadden me.
Note in the laws above all these are broken as above weaponry and surveillance. Note in Definitions 'chemtrails' which governments denied. With the event of thousands and thousands and thousands of satellite's going up DAILEY a meshed net will encircle our precious Earth---this is no idle conspiracy just subscribing as I did for a few weeks to the above trio of Space Media, Space Dailey and Space Wars, they will shock you and the trillions and billions dollars plus private crony contracts will shock you---and according to an astronaut friend of mine and a silicone scientist friend of mine they will justify this with several reasons; 1) the need to monitor hostile ballistic missiles, 2) Surveillance on hostile nuclear sites.3) Surveillance on terrorist movements. 4) Tracking weather and Sun CME's. 5) Tracking of criminals and undesirables, refugees and asylum seekers, drug runners and Mafioso who will be fixed with alarm bracelets. 6) Monitoring of vaccination population who will be 'caught and seen' and recorded by their nanoparticle particles through inoculation 7) Monitoring GMO Crops and protection of manufacturing and warehouse facilities 8) Alarms if variants of human made mRNA breakout or any other biohazards of an extreme nature.
On Wednesday, March 24, 2021, both the number of satellites in low orbit around the earth, and the volume of data they transmit, increased significantly. On Wednesday morning (4:28 a.m. EDT, 8:28 UTC), SpaceX launched another 60 satellites. On Wednesday evening (10:47 p.m. EDT, 14:47 UTC), OneWeb launched another 36 satellites. And people who already have satellite Internet from SpaceX on a trial basis reported a sudden increase in their Internet speed on Wednesday to up to 430 Mbps.
This could explain the reports I am beginning to receive of sudden illness that began on Wednesday. I myself was unable to sleep at all Wednesday night, and my body hurt, and itched, all over. I was very ill all day Thursday, and still do not feel well. I have received similar reports from other people in the United States, Canada, Norway, Australia and South Africa. I would like to find out how widespread this is. Some people are reporting that they have not felt well for a couple of weeks, but that they suddenly got much sicker Wednesday or Wednesday night.
Please reply to this email if you have experienced something similar.
Current Players and Their Plans
Here is a list of companies that are actively planning to launch and operate large constellations of satellites in low orbit around the earth. The purpose of these satellite networks is to provide Internet and/or cell phone service everywhere on earth, as well as to facilitate the Internet of Things. All will shoot focused beams of radiation at the earth from phased array antennas.
SpaceX SpaceX, based in the United States, already has approval to operate 12,000 satellites and has filed applications for 30,000 more. More than 1,300 have already been launched. At least initially, these satellites are for Internet only and will not communicate directly with cell phones. Subscribers will purchase a small rooftop dish and a WiFi router. Beta testing by an estimated 10,000 subscribers in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany and New Zealand is already happening.
OneWeb OneWeb, based in the United Kingdon, has aready launched 148 satellites, and plans to begin providing service after it has 250 satellites in orbit. Initial service will be to northern latitude regions, including the UK, Europe, Greenland, Canada, and Alaska. OneWeb plans to provide cell phone as well as Internet service. Subscribers will purchase a small user terminal that will function as a small cell, able to connect to any mobile device in its vicinity. OneWeb has scaled back its planned number of satellites from 49,000 to 7,088. It does not plan to compete directly with SpaceX. Instead it will market its service to airlines, businesses and governments.
Telesat Telesat, based in Canada, has increased its planned number of satellites from 117 to 1,671. It, too, is marketing its service to businesses. Its customers will include cruise ships, airlines, and governments. Telesat intends for its satellites to replace terrestrial fiber networks for long-distance communication. “We’re basically deploying a big space-based mesh IP network,” said its CEO Dan Goldberg.
AST & Science This company, based in the U.S., is designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. But instead of selling its service directly to cell phone users, it will partner with existing cell phone service providers, so that when a cell phone user travels out of range of any cell towers, the cell phone’s signal will automatically be handed off to a satellite. While this company does not plan to have as many satellites as its competitors, the power levels of its communicating beams will be much greater. Its application to the FCC specifies a maximum EIRP (effective radiating power) of up to 79.2 dBW, or more than 83,000,000 watts per beam.
Omnispace This company, partnering with Lockheed Martin and the U.S. military, is also designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. Its brochure boasts that it will “enable the Internet of Things on a massive new scale.” “Omnispace is honored to have been selected to work with the U.S. Navy and Marines to demonstrate 5G capability from space,” said Campbell Marshall, Vice President for Government and International Markets in a March 15, 2021 interview. Omnispace has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.
Amazon Amazon’s application to operate 3,236 satellites was approved by the FCC last July. Like SpaceX, it plans to sell small user terminals to its customers for mounting on rooftops and vehicles.
Lynk Like Omnispace and AST & Science, Lynk is designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. Like AST & Science, Lynk has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.
Facebook Facebook is planning to launch a constellation of small, 150-pound satellites, called cubesats. It too has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.
The last 15 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading and sharing on theNewsletters pageof the Cellular Phone Task Force. Some of the newsletters are also available there in German, Spanish, Italian, and French.
Courtesy The Telegraph
This is about 19 Australian ecosystems and more that are being lost.
Although the scientists blame humanity for carbon and pollution I still maintain that the major contributor are the natural 6th extinction cycles which can be found under the 5 extinctions. The 6th is occurring now-- gradual process and build up the signs are and discussed in back POSTS.
I hope and trust my conspiracy 'nose' and perhaps suspicious and cynical attitude at times are mistaken;
UK extends emergency coronavirus powers by 6 months
British lawmakers have agreed to prolong coronavirus emergency measures for six months, allowing the Conservative government to keep its unprecedented powers to restrict U.K. citizens’ everyday lives
By JILL LAWLESS Associated Press
25 March 2021, 17:42
• 4 min read
The lifting of the lockdown and all that mask and social distancing was supposed to be eased by 12--21 June 2021 but maybe if the figures are down over the fake virus which has not been identified yet;
The following exhibit name is protected as there is a law suit in process.
Officially its the flu. “I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I'm a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 "supposed" positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch's postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. “We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. “We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can't or won't send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they've never really found the virus, all they've ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway. “So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud.”
The PCR tests are useless;
And masks you can find many explanations why they are downright dangerous and we were advised not to wear them;
The evidence for face coverings is “not very strong in either direction”, the Deputy Chief Medical Officer has admitted, despite a last minute U-turn on masks in schools.....
Prime Minister Boris Johnson insists he does not want to see face coverings in schools
England’s chief medical officer has warned the public wearing face masks will do little to combat the ongoing coronavirus outbreak.
Professor Chris Whitty told Sky News on Wednesday that wearing a face mask had almost no effect on reducing the risk of contracting the illness.
Prof Whitty said: “In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.”
“The only people we do sometimes use masks for are people who have got an infection and that is to help them to stop it spreading around," he added.
NOW THE NEXT PIECE OF THE JIG SAW --I HOPE I AM MISTAKEN
British lawmakers have agreed to prolong coronavirus emergency measures for six months, allowing the Conservative government to keep its unprecedented powers to restrict U.K. citizens’ everyday lives
I FEEL THE ABOVE IS CONNECTED TO THE FOLLOWING;
From link below
Sue Mountstevens, Avon and Somerset's police and crime commissioner said the acts showed 'reckless disregard' of people's lives and safety
There have been violent clashes in Bristol, following protests against new laws making their way through Parliament.
The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is a mammoth piece of legislation that includes major government proposals on crime and justice in England and Wales. One part of it covers changes to protests.
What powers do police have now;
There has been protests all over the UK and even 60 MP's protested the rest and labour were gutless short cited myopic dipsticks; why I say this the emergency powers have been extended to September / October 2021 AND I HOPE I AM MISTAKEN; THE FLU WHICH HAS BEEN CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN OR ADDED TO THE COVID STATISTICS START IN OCTOBER AND THE JAB WILL BE FORCED OR FEARED INTO and of course the new Edinburgh, the new Argyle, the New Argentinian, the New ????? VARIANT's WILL BE FOUND.
From back POSTS
This is part of the New World Order Reset and the Davos 220 World Economic Forum in which the Klaus Schwab technocracy and eugenics mob said 'you will be happy not owning anything' read their agenda and we will which they did not say be 'owned by them' another commodity and bargaining chip and ploy . See 'Welcome to Smart City 'POST
How then does this fit in with the New Police Bill; With the lockdowns, social distancing and mask crap to a fake virus a clever manipulation of the graphs and figures, YES there were deaths and they were a bad flu, fear, mask wearing, people stuck in doors sitting on couches watching TV and depression, suicides AND DEDICTAED HOSPITALS THAT ONLY DEALT WITH COVID AND OF COURSE SHORTAGE AND PRESSURE whilst other hospitals were empty.(SEE ALL 75 BACK POSTS) and big 1,000 bed tent hospitals never used and billions.
SO they broke the back of most small businesses AND NOW THE FEW that remain they want to break AND SO come October ITS BACK oh GOD no please, no more lock downs, distancing ANYTHING BUT THAT and so finally breaking the rest of the small business and breaking the backs and minds the last straw that broke the camels back and we are done, more schools at home, extreme riots and anger HENCE THE NEW POLICE POWERS. As I say I hope I am mistaken.
The Thing is folks there is a lot of text and I hope it does affect you. These are templates for writing to the authorities and information laid out for the future and correspondence. I understand if this is too much, so I will be back to the usual next time. However a huge welcome and lots of love. (Some people these days are afraid of the word love and its connotations, so lots of good healthy thoughts and compassion). Should the text that follows not interest you scroll down to another few items of a different nature.
Dr Joseph Mercola Courtesy Singularity Weblog
Below this is taken from Mercola.com any missing videos will be found on his site as he has been deplatformed and censored. Joseph Mercola is a brave and courageous person and for me I admire him immensely.
Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, a general practitioner in Cheshire,
England, and the author
of three books, including “Statin Nation,” has made it his mission to add some
balance to the widespread fear-mongering that occurs at the hands of the health
care lobby and media.(use search bar in POST as I have Posted him several times, he was brave enough to say they all were signing Covid on everything medical certificates and no one picked him and doubted him)
“In a world where the truth can be, literally, turned upside down, how can
you know what to believe, and who to believe?” he asks. His blog attempts to
“dig down to find the meaning behind the headlines,” and one of his recent
posts centred on COVID-19 and the “impossible things” — some might call them
lies — that are being propagated in its name.1
Courtesy Medium
Top Eight
COVID Lies
Kendrick’s post takes aim at widespread COVID-themed disinformation,
highlighting six top inconsistencies. I’ve added two more as well.
1.No Such Thing as Herd Immunity
— Except From Vaccines —Herd immunity occurs
when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can
no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low
enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached.
Prior to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved via
exposure to and recovery from an infectious disease.
Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity
evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from
prior illness but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that can occur
after vaccination.
In the case of COVID-19, however, we’ve been told that the idea of natural
herd immunity to COVID-19 is not achievable — and even considering that it
could be is “deadly and dangerous.”2 Yet, a curious thing happened. When vaccines
became available, the idea of vaccine-induced herd immunity to COVID-19 became
widespread. According to Kendrick:3
“First, I was told that attempting to create herd immunity was not
achievable. It would also be extremely dangerous and would inevitably result in
many hundreds of thousands of excess deaths.
Then the vaccines arrived at fantastical speed and I was told that
mass vaccination, by creating herd immunity, would be the factor that would
allow us to conquer COVID19 and return to normal life. I am not entirely sure
which of these things is impossible, but one of them must be.”
2.Vaccines Induce ‘Stronger and
Longer Lasting Immunity’ — In February 2021, The HuffPost
reported that the COVID-19 vaccine would “induce stronger and longer lasting
immunity” than the immunity induced by natural infection.4 However, an internist
with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, Dr. Meryl Nass, suggests
the protection the
COVID vaccine provides will be inferior to that acquired
via natural infection:
“No one knows how long immunity lasts, if in fact the vaccines do
provide some degree of immunity … For every known vaccine, the immunity it
provides is less robust and long-lasting than the immunity obtained from having
had the infection.
People who have had Covid really have no business getting vaccinated —
they get all the risk and none of the benefit.”
In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises people
who have previously been infected with COVID-19 to still get vaccinated, even
though trials suggest there’s no benefit in
this population. A CDC report also incorrectly cited the
vaccine’s effectiveness for those previously infected, prompting one
congressman to say they’re “lying.”
In a high-profile report issued by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices, 15 scientists stated that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19
vaccine had “consistent high efficacy” of 92% or more among people with
evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.5
But according to Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky, “That sentence is wrong. There
is no efficacy demonstrated in the Pfizer trial among participants with
evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and actually there's no proof in the
Moderna trial either.”6 Kendrick
adds:7
“I also know that vaccinations can only ever really create an
attenuated response. Whereas a full-blown infection triggers a full-blown
immune response.
So, I think it is pretty close to impossible that vaccination can
provide greater protection than that from getting the actual disease. Which is
why I think it is utterly bonkers we are actually vaccinating people who have
circulating antibodies in their blood.”
3.Universal Mask Use Is Essential
to Stop COVID-19 — It’s been touted that face masks are essential
to stopping the spread of COVID-19 and could save 130,000 lives in the U.S.
alone.8 But
in 2019, the World Health Organization analyzed 10 randomized controlled trials
and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing
transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”9
Only one randomized controlled trial has been conducted on mask usage and
COVID-19 transmission, and it found masks did not statistically
significantly reduce the incidence of infection.10
“Never has a trial been subjected to such immediate and hostile reporting.
Fact-checkers (whoever exactly they might be, or what understanding they have
of medical research) immediately attacked it,” Kendrick noted, adding:11
“Yes, we have now entered a world when political fact checkers feel
free to attack and contradict the findings of scientific papers, using such
scientific terms as ‘Mostly false’ … Ignoring the modern-day Spanish
Inquisition, and their ill-informed criticisms, I will simply call this study.
More evidence that face masks don’t work. Perhaps someone will come
along with a study proving that face masks work. So far … nada. Another
impossible thing.”
4.COVID-19 Death Statistics — The
positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for
COVID-19 are plagued with problems, one of which is that
they are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools as they cannot distinguish
between inactive (noninfectious) viruses and "live" or reproductive
ones.12
If you have a nonreproductive virus in your body, you will not get sick
from it and you cannot spread it to others. Further, many if not most
laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in
healthy people testing "positive.” These false positive tests, in turn,
can contribute to the number of people dying “with” COVID-19, but not actually
dying “of” the disease.
“[W]e have the very strange concept that any death within twenty-eight
days of a positive COVID19 swab is recorded as a COVID19 death,” Kendrick said,
explaining:13
“You can have a positive swab long after you have been infected — and
recovered. There are just some bits of virus up your nose that can be
magnified, through the wonders of the PCR test, into a positive result.
Which means that an elderly person, infected months ago, can be
admitted to hospital for any reason whatsoever. The they can have a positive
swab — everyone is swabbed. Then they can die, from whatever it was they were
admitted for in the first place. Then, they will be recorded as a COVID19
death.
In truth, this is just the start of impossible things when it comes to
the number of COVID19 deaths. Do not get me started on PCR cycle numbers, and
false positives. We would be here all day.”
5.The Swedish COVID-19 Response
Was a Disaster —Sweden handled
the pandemic differently than most of the globe, and has been chided for its
looser restrictions and lack of severe lockdowns. In October 2020, TIME called
the Swedish COVID-19 response a “disaster,”14 but Kendrick cites data showing that the
death rate in Sweden
in 2020 was right in line with other years — nothing out of the ordinary.15
When Kendrick compared the number of deaths in Sweden
in 2012 — one of their highest death statistics — to 2020, the difference
between absolute death rate in 2012 and 2020 is 0.012%.
“That is 120 extra deaths per million of the population, which is 1,224
people in a population of 10.2 million. The statistics tell us that twelve
thousand people died from COVID19 in Sweden.
Maybe you can make all that add up. Frankly, I find it impossible.”16
6.Lockdowns Have Worked — Available
data reveal lockdowns have
been completely ineffective at lowering positive test rates, while extracting a
huge cost in terms of human suffering and societal health.
Using data from the Worldometer,17 Kendrick compiled a list of the countries
with the highest rate of COVID-19, based on deaths per million of the
population. Every country on the list, which included the U.K.,
Italy, the U.S.,
Spain, Mexico
and others, had “fairly strict” lockdowns.
Four countries that have been criticized for not having strict lockdowns —
Sweden, Japan,
Belarus and Nicaragua
— did not make the list, and have an average death rate of 391 per million. In
contrast, the top 20 “lockdown” countries have an average death rate of 1,520
per million. According to Kendrick:18
“Yet although this evidence is out there, I am being asked to believe
that lockdowns work. At least the WHO agrees with me on this impossible thing.
As Dr. David Nabarro, the WHO special envoy on COVID19 said, ‘We
really do appeal to all world leaders, stop using lockdown as your primary
method of control. Lockdowns have just one consequence that you must never ever
belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.’19”
7.Asymptomatic Spreaders Are
Driving the Pandemic — The reasoning given for lockdowns, masks
and social distancing is to stop the spread of disease among people who are
asymptomatic. It’s common sense to stay home if you’re sick and exhibiting
symptoms, but for people who feel healthy, the institution of lockdowns to
prevent asymptomatic spread is unprecedented.
Yet, during a June 8, 2020,
press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical
lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic
transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests
positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live
virus to others.
A study in Nature Communications also found "there was no evidence of
transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts."20 When they further
tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the
300, or 63.3%, had actually had a "hot" or productive infection
resulting in the production of antibodies. Still, none of their contacts had
been infected.21
8.The Virus Didn’t Come From a
Lab Accident — Despite the complete absence of a plausible
zoonotic origin theory, WHO’s investigative commission, tasked
with identifying the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has
officially cleared the Wuhan Institute of Virology and two other biosafety
level 4 laboratories in Wuhan of wrongdoing, saying these labs had nothing to
do with the COVID-19 outbreak.22
The WHO investigation was riddled with
conflicts of interest from the start, and no credible
theory for natural zoonotic spillover has been presented to date. However,
there are at least four distinct lab origin theories, including the serial
passage theory, which proposes the virus was created by serial passaging
through an animal host or cell culture, as well as evidence for genetic
manipulation.23
You may be wondering, if there’s so much evidence pointing toward a lab
origin, why are leading health authorities and scientists dismissing it all and
insisting SARS-CoV-2 is a natural occurrence, mysterious as it might be?
Should the COVID-19 pandemic be officially recognized as the result of a
lab accident, the world might be forced to take a cold hard look at gain-of-function
research that allows for the creation of these new
pathogens. The end result would ideally be the banning of such research
worldwide, with significant financial repercussions, the ending of prestigious
careers in that realm and potential criminal charges for those involved as
well.
In the face of misinformation and manipulation, what you can do now is
keep your eyes open and your ears tuned to the science, so you don’t fall
victim to the unnecessary panic and fear, or the increased surveillance and
control, that is being created.
From Article above if not found or taken down use link below
I am writing in response to your call for evidence on
COVID-status certification.
In summary, my view is that the Government should not
support domestic COVID-status certification and, owing to profound civil
liberties, rights and equality concerns, should legislate to prohibit private
companies from using COVID-status certification as a requirement for customers
and staff alike. I believe this is vital for the Government to uphold its duty
to protect human rights and prevent discrimination.
I also wish to state at the outset of my response that I am
concerned about the validity of this review. Four days after this call for evidence
was opened, the Culture Secretary was reported to be planning the use of
COVID-status certificates for large stadium events this summer. I am deeply
concerned by the prospect that the Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Duchy
of Lancaster, the Minister for COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment among others may
have misled parliament and the public by not only issuing assurances that there
was no intention to use vaccine passports at all, but by later planning their
use just days after opening a review to consider whether their use would be
lawful, ethical or effective.
Question 1
Which of the following best describes the capacity in which
you are responding to this call for evidence?
I am a:
g) Individual
Question 2
In your view, what are the key considerations, including
opportunities and risks, associated with a potential COVID-status certification
scheme? We would welcome specific reference to:
a) clinical / medical considerations
The professed purpose of a COVID-status certificate is to
create environments where the risk of transmitting coronavirus is negligible by
requiring evidence of a vaccination or test result as a condition of entry.
Firstly, I believe the Government’s priority ought to be
protecting those most vulnerable to the virus – which has now happened. The
Government reported that 93% of over 75s have received a vaccination and
vaccine uptake for younger people at comparatively lower risk continues to be
remarkably high. The vaccine deployment success among those most vulnerable to
coronavirus means hospitalisations and excess deaths are certain to fall, and
onerous controls on society are not justifiable.
Secondly, vaccination status is an invalid basis on which to
declare an individual as at low risk of transmission. There is currently no
conclusive, peer-reviewed evidence on the effect of the COVID vaccines on
transmission of the virus, and very little on vaccines and COVID transmission
relating to the older age groups.
The insufficiency of evidence on the impact of COVID vaccines
on transmission of the virus is one of the reasons that the WHO advises against
vaccine requirements as a condition of international travel. However, if the
vaccines do significantly reduce transmission, infection rates and thus deaths
will reduce even faster, rendering onerous controls such as COVID-status
certificates even less necessary and even more disproportionate.
Whilst evidence on the impact of COVID vaccines on
transmissibility of the virus is insufficient, mass testing would be the assumed
condition of entry via COVID-status certificates. The proposed method would be
to use rapid Lateral Flow Tests (LFTs). Firstly, coerced medical testing of
healthy people without any symptoms of coronavirus, especially when the
vulnerable population has been vaccinated and the overall impact of coronavirus
is vastly reduced, is incredibly difficult to medically justify. Secondly, LFTs
are only a useful indicator of infections when the true infection rate in the
general population is high. As set out in the Royal Statistical Society
COVID-19 Taskforce on 5th March 2021:
“while the usual concern with LFTs is false negatives, when
infection-prevalence is low there is also a risk that the majority of
'positive' tests could be false positives.” This means individuals (and by
proxy their friends, family, colleagues, and anyone else they have come into
contact with) could be wrongly denied their rights, falsely denied paid-for
products, services or events, and needless panic could be caused which would be
harmful both to the reopening of the economy and to individuals’ rights.
As an alternative during this period of exiting lockdown, I
believe the emphasis should be on strong medical support for those who are
infected, rather than treating the whole nation as potentially infectious. This
means encouraging and supporting people to isolate and take a reliable test
either following the onset of COVID symptoms or exposure to an individual who
has tested positive via a reliable test, and improving the NHS Test and Trace
system.
b) legal, (ethical and equalities) considerations
The effect of COVID-status certification would be to
socially and economically exclude people without a COVID vaccine or recent test
result and deny them basic freedoms. In doing so, some of the most marginalised
in society would suffer either direct or indirect discrimination.
Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and
the Equality Act 2010 protect individuals from unlawful discrimination. Under
equality law, it is unlawful to discriminate against people with ‘protected
characteristics’, many of which are engaged by COVID-status certificate
proposals, including age, disability, pregnancy and religion or belief.
If the Government allows society to be segregated according
to vaccination status:
Young people would be discriminated against, since there
will be lower and slower vaccine uptake as young people are both generally at a
low risk of serious illness from the virus and last in line to be offered a
vaccination. Children are not eligible for vaccines as trials are ongoing.
Further, if vaccines are required annually/periodically, young people could be
discriminated against on a corresponding cycle as they will always be last in
line to receive vaccines.
Disabled people could be discriminated against as some
medical conditions prevent individuals from being able to receive a
vaccination.
Pregnant women would be discriminated against, as covid
vaccines are not routinely advised for them and whilst clinical trials are ongoing,
women may be cautious about vaccines whilst pregnant, breastfeeding or trying
to conceive.
Some people with religious or other beliefs may be
discriminated against, if those beliefs deter them from receiving a vaccine.
Discrimination, inequality and unfairness would be caused
not only by medical eligibility for vaccination but by accessibility of
vaccinations. Research indicates that people from ethnic minority groups,
people with lower levels of education and lower incomes are the most ‘hesitant’
or unlikely to receive COVID vaccines (Fancourt, Paul & Steptoe 2020).
Further, many of the estimated 1 million undocumented migrants in the UK
are fearful of accessing health services due to punitive data sharing as part
of hostile environment policies and may be more apprehensive still if
COVID-status certificates become an everyday requirement. We cannot simply
erase histories and experiences of discrimination and hostility that have
created distrust. In fact, vaccine segregation would only deepen discrimination
and alienate people even more. This would be disastrous for trust in public
health authorities when trust has never been needed more.
Finally, there are billions of citizens of the world who
simply will not have access to COVID vaccines for several years to come. As we
emerge from the pandemic, disproportionate vaccine requirements should not
unfairly impede the rights and freedom of movement of individuals from
lower-income countries.
The alternative to vaccination evidence, which is a recent
test result, also carries legal and ethical problems. Firstly, under even the
most extreme UK
law, required medical testing is only possible if an individual is known to be
potentially infectious (Coronavirus Act 2020). Further, pre-existing public
health law only allows a medical examination to be ordered by a magistrate if a
person is believed to be infected or contaminated (Health and Social Care Act
2008). However, COVID-status certificates would effectively make medical
testing mandatory for all, treating all citizens – and particularly those with
protected characteristics who are unable to receive a vaccination – as
potentially infectious. The onerous burden of healthy people having to undergo
frequent medical testing in order to enjoy basic rights could also lead to a
loss of earnings and, if/when tests are no longer free, could incur financial
penalties.
c) operational / delivery considerations
The cost to the public purse of mass testing and the
development of a mass COVID-status certification infrastructure is likely to be
astronomical, despite the lack of benefits and severe risks.
d) considerations relating to the operation of venues that
could use a potential COVID-status certification scheme
COVID-status certification would be burdensome for venues
which would not only be liable to legal challenges from customers and staff,
but have to undertake to verify a genuine COVID-status and deny entry to
individuals without one. In most public environments such as supermarkets,
shopping centres, entertainment venues and restaurants etc. there are no access
control mechanisms meaning venues would have to create checkpoints for
customers and staff to enter and install security staff to enforce
requirements. This would not only lead to increased costs for venues but the
likelihood of conflict and altercations and increasingly oppressive environment
for citizens.
e) considerations relating to the responsibilities or
actions of employers under a potential COVID-status certification scheme.
The legal issues outlined above apply to employers, who
cannot unlawfully discriminate against current or potential employees. Even if
an employer believes they are able to lawfully offer a general service (e.g. a
cruise) to exclusively vaccinated individuals, it would be wrong and
potentially unlawful to demand that current or prospective staff undergo
medical treatment (e.g. vaccination) or medical testing (e.g. LFT) as a
condition of employment. These issues merit serious consideration.
f) ethical considerations
See (b)
g) equalities considerations
See (b)
h) privacy considerations
COVID-status certificates present an unprecedented privacy
intrusion. Never before have individuals needed to demonstrate their health
status or indeed any medical information to enjoy day to day freedoms. The
requirement to use an app or, for individuals without a smart phone, a QR code
relating to sensitive medical data engages Article 8 privacy rights, GDPR and
the Data Protection Act 2018. This privacy intrusion would be widespread and,
in my view, challengeable.
The UK
has a proud history of opposition to ID cards. We are not a papers-carrying
country. COVID-status certificates would turn us into a two-tier, checkpoint
society where we each have to show an app or certificate simply in order to
enjoy public life. This would be a serious break from our long-guarded
democratic traditions, respect of privacy, and would most disadvantage
marginalised people. The combination of apps with sensitive health data and the
subversion of everyday businesses and events into checkpoints could constitute
the biggest expansion of surveillance ever seen in the UK.
Further, many health data apps are accessed via biometric
facial recognition. The requirement to use facial recognition engages GDPR/DPA
rights and individuals should have a right to refuse. Further, facial
recognition algorithms suffer from inaccuracy and have particular issues
accurately recognising women and people of colour (NIST). Such apps would be
likely to compound discrimination issues and may wrongly obstruct individuals
from enjoying their rights and freedoms.
It has been suggested that exemptions could be created to
allow certain unvaccinated people with protected characteristics into spaces
governed by COVID-status certificates and/or where only vaccinated people are
permitted. As outlined above, I believe there would be serious legal and
ethical issues with such controls – but there would be serious privacy issues
too. Others may deduce that the exempt or unvaccinated individual has health
problems, is pregnant, or has a certain belief system. This is not only an
invasion of privacy but could lead to disadvantageous treatment, particularly
in an employment context.
Bodily autonomy is an important aspect of the right to
privacy. Compulsory vaccination, as an involuntary medical treatment, amounts
to an interference with the right to a private life (Solomakhin v Ukraine).
I believe individuals have the right to make their own
choices about their own bodies. UK
laws generally respect medical consent and mandatory vaccines are prohibited
under the Public Health Act. However, COVID-status certificates would clearly
cause people to feel coerced into receiving vaccines to avoid the onerous
alternative of constant medical tests or, worse, reduced freedoms. They would
have a similar effect to mandatory vaccine policies, which are typically
imposed by exclusion or penalties for those who decline vaccines. The penalty
of reduced liberties for otherwise healthy individuals who decline a certain
medical treatment or test would mark a grave change in our public health system
and rights record as a whole.
Question 3
Are there any other comments you would like to make to
inform the COVID-status certification review?
Yours sincerely
[Your name]
Apologies if this bored the what so names off of you.
Unless
there is absolute PROOF that the vaccine prevents TRANSMISSION of the virus,
then there is absolutely NO REASON to have vaccine PASSPORTS., also the WHO has
said it's unethical and impractical- still they'll try domestically.
Courtesy Earth Changes Media
I have stacks and stacks on this subject in loads and loads of POSTS back and a great example from WTDDY, spaceweather.com and my research can be found;
POST 369. TRUST. Monday 20th May 2019
Long-Term Study of Heart Rate VSPACE WEATHER BALLOON DATA: Approximately once a week, Spaceweather.com and the students of Earth to Sky Calculus fly space weather balloons to the stratosphere over California. These balloons are equipped with radiation sensors that detect cosmic rays, a surprisingly "down to Earth" form of space weather. Cosmic rays can seed clouds, trigger lightning, and penetrate commercial airplanes. Furthermore, there are studies ( #1, #2, #3, #4) linking cosmic rays with cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in the general population. Our latest measurements show that cosmic rays are intensifying, with an increase of more than 18% since 2015 (courtesy to spaceweather.com where you can get daily forecasts) A thought how much of this affected Covid cases and made them vulnerable to this bad flu as you will see in 2019 blog and rea the # tags and in particular information in their articles about solar minimum and my repeated updates way back to take care if you will during solar minimum.
variability Responses to Changes in the Solar and Geomagnetic Environment
Just shows what goes on around the world--wars and rumour s of wars and actual wars.
In the next blog the startling revelations and actual contracts that are being given out to space technology and this is just a tip of the iceberg. I could put at least a dozen or more and its all cyber, space, 5G and satellites and a UN and congress law that forbids 'exotic weaponry which the law lists as existing and includes CHEMTRAILS which have vehemently denied and ignored so until next time.
Be Well
Geoff
www.shackisback.blogspot has now got a few more, these are my memoirs, experiences, observations, short anecdotes, koans and riddles with prose, at the moment 955 to pick up and browse. Shack is one of nicknames.