Tuesday 30 March 2021


My Modern Met
Hi and welcome. I apologise if this image above is abhorrent because in the courtesy to My Modern Art the word Met to me describes what is going on with Police Act and its more powers voting in parliament in the UK and its looking like and similar too the USA(https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/894/text?) and the Patriot Bill.
From Posts
Perhaps Dr WHO can sort it out.

The feelings about this law is tremendous:-

Protest against policing bill outside New Scotland Yard police headquarters, in London. © Reuters / Henry Nicholls ( I NOT LIKE 'KILL THE BILL' HOPEFULLY THEY MEAN BILL IN THE FORM OF LAW --SOMETIMES BILL IS USED AS LAW--UNFORTUNATELY IT IS ALSO THE NAME FOR POLICE---THE OLD BILL--One of the explanations of the origin of the London slang term Old Billmeaning the police, is that constables often used to sport "Old Bill" moustaches. A 1911 B-type London bus, one of 900 which served as troop transports in World War I, was restored and named "Old Bill" in 1926.

Its a bit late now and like all other countries whilst the general public suffered and cowered about masks and lockdowns and vaccines(which I have tried one jab to see if I can detox it--so far no joy--will not have the booster) and we have been given the message that deprived of liberty over lock downs, fined over gathering or not six feet apart and fined for not mask wearing its too late because the majority have given in and that makes those who not comply seen as conspiracy theory nuts, right wing or any other wing cultists and terrorists, fascists and any other label.

He is right in his words and the vaccine investors chemical companies are drowning in profits. What's for lunch.

I bet that's not what he had in mind (me) Courtesy Twitter
 This is the best video I have come across that explains in simple and graphic terms how the immune and vaccine work, It is this and the fact that the lab tests on me confirmed what he says that will make me not take the second jab---unless we have a detox in the lab to annul it.


 This is a masterpiece in the mask saga and its nice to see someone who is a real journalist and exposes the tricks of journalism. Video is in it.


 This is hilarious and it was nice to see Fauci squirm when this super comedian celebrity go at him. Video


From Article below

This summarises what the various governments are doing to gradually erode the human rights and the strange hypocrisy that goes with it. 


Dominic Raab was speaking ‘candidly’ to civil servants, the Foreign Office permanent secretary said. Photograph: Anadolu/Getty Images

This is the sort of double and treble standards----the phrase we can deal with countries with lower standards of human rights is OK as we are in a better position to talk with them and suggest better rights for all ----hasn't done a thing for Saudi Arabia committing genocide on Yemen and GB supplying arms for years. Hypocrisy, nah just money and greed---by the way get vaccinated and wear five masks and yes Chris Whitty has hinted there will be a rise in Covid near the end of the year ---more vaccines and you liar because the flu season begins then---and the general public will mask up and mess themselves and the fear of more lock downs and the government fearing civil unrest bring in the draconian new Police Act.


A cathedral servant stands outside the Cologne Cathedral, a landmark of Cologne, western Germany, on March 18, 2021. © AFP / Ina FASSBENDER

When you read this you will be horrified. Yes it is the same old historic abuse by Catholic Priests and if you read the side panels which are articles in themselves you will see what the Nuns have got up too. I hope they get vaccinated, keep their distance and wear masks (condoms). What's this double masks, six feet apart and sexual distancing and triple condoms, my, my, makes it a bit difficult I might say. By the way why aren't they not prosecuted for breaking the Covid rules as well. 



Courtesy Down To Earth
and not so far away technology and in view of the synopsis in the law H.R.2977 ---HOW GOES YOU ON THIS ?

Courtesy  Pinterest


This Act may be cited as the ``Space Preservation Act of 2001''.


    Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating 
that it ``is the policy of the United States that activities in space 
should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all 


    The President shall--
            (1) implement a permanent ban on space-based weapons of the 
        United States and remove from space any existing space-based 
        weapons of the United States; and
            (2) immediately order the permanent termination of research 
        and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and 
        deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States and 
        their components.


    The President shall direct the United States representatives to the 
United Nations and other international organizations to immediately 
work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing a world agreement 
banning space-based weapons.


    The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 days thereafter, a 
report on--
            (1) the implementation of the permanent ban on space-based 
        weapons required by section 3; and
            (2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing 
        the agreement described in section 4.


    Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of 
funds for--
            (1) space exploration;
            (2) space research and development;
            (3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not 
        related to space-based weapons or systems; or
            (4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including 
        communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early 
        warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based 
        weapons or systems.


    In this Act:
            (1) The term ``space'' means all space extending upward 
        from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface 
        of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
            (2)(A) The terms ``weapon'' and ``weapons system'' mean a 
        device capable of any of the following:
                    (i) Damaging or destroying an object (whether in 
                outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
                            (I) firing one or more projectiles to 
                        collide with that object;
                            (II) detonating one or more explosive 
                        devices in close proximity to that object;
                            (III) directing a source of energy 
                        (including molecular or atomic energy, 
                        subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic 
                        radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency 
                        (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy 
                        radiation) against that object; or
                            (IV) any other unacknowledged or as yet 
                        undeveloped means.
                    (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or 
                destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily 
                health, mental health, or physical and economic well-
                being of a person)--
                            (I) through the use of any of the means 
                        described in clause (i) or subparagraph (B);
                            (II) through the use of land-based, sea-
                        based, or space-based systems using radiation, 
                        electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or 
                        other energies directed at individual persons 
                        or targeted populations for the purpose of 
                        information war, mood management, or mind 
                        control of such persons or populations; or
                            (III) by expelling chemical or biological 
                        agents in the vicinity of a person.
            (B) Such terms include exotic weapons systems such as--
                    (i) electronic, psychotronic, or information 
                    (ii) chemtrails;
                    (iii) high altitude ultra low frequency weapons 
                    (iv) plasma, electromagnetic, sonic, or ultrasonic 
                    (v) laser weapons systems;
                    (vi) strategic, theater, tactical, or 
                extraterrestrial weapons; and
                    (vii) chemical, biological, environmental, climate, 
                or tectonic weapons.
            (C) The term ``exotic weapons systems'' includes weapons 
        designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the 
        ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and 
        tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or 
        destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in 
1)  https://www.spacewar.com/reports/AFRL_directed_energy_industry_days_999.html
2) utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=cc4fbf8a-fef7-446e-b013-777366a5330a
3) https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/FAA_streamlined_launch_and_reentry_rule_t





These above can be found in; Space Media Net work, Space Dailey.com Space War.com ---One can subscribe free to their newsletters and for the technically minded and gadgets with latest exotic weaponry and surveillance they are gems for me they sadden me. 

Note in the laws above all these are broken as above weaponry and surveillance. Note in Definitions 'chemtrails' which governments denied.  With the event of thousands and thousands and thousands of satellite's going up DAILEY a meshed net will encircle our precious Earth---this is no idle conspiracy just subscribing as I did for a few weeks to the above trio of Space Media, Space Dailey and Space Wars, they will shock you and the trillions and billions dollars plus private crony contracts will shock you---and according to an astronaut friend of mine and a silicone scientist friend of mine they will justify this with several reasons; 1) the need to monitor hostile ballistic missiles, 2) Surveillance on hostile nuclear sites.3) Surveillance on terrorist movements. 4) Tracking weather and Sun CME's. 5) Tracking of criminals and undesirables, refugees and asylum seekers, drug runners and Mafioso who will be fixed with alarm bracelets. 6) Monitoring of vaccination population who will be 'caught and seen' and recorded by their nanoparticle particles through inoculation 7) Monitoring GMO Crops and protection of manufacturing and warehouse facilities 8) Alarms if variants of human made mRNA breakout or any other biohazards of an extreme nature.

Update on Satellites


Arthur Firstenberg [email protected]

Sat, 27 Mar, 18:07 (17 hours ago)
to me
To forward this newsletter via social media, copy and paste this link:

On Wednesday, March 24, 2021, both the number of satellites in low orbit around the earth, and the volume of data they transmit, increased significantly. On Wednesday morning (4:28 a.m. EDT, 8:28 UTC), SpaceX launched another 60 satellites. On Wednesday evening (10:47 p.m. EDT, 14:47 UTC), OneWeb launched another 36 satellites. And people who already have satellite Internet from SpaceX on a trial basis reported a sudden increase in their Internet speed on Wednesday to up to 430 Mbps.

This could explain the reports I am beginning to receive of sudden illness that began on Wednesday. I myself was unable to sleep at all Wednesday night, and my body hurt, and itched, all over. I was very ill all day Thursday, and still do not feel well. I have received similar reports from other people in the United States, Canada, Norway, Australia and South Africa. I would like to find out how widespread this is. Some people are reporting that they have not felt well for a couple of weeks, but that they suddenly got much sicker Wednesday or Wednesday night.

Please reply to this email if you have experienced something similar.
Current Players and Their Plans
Here is a list of companies that are actively planning to launch and operate large constellations of satellites in low orbit around the earth. The purpose of these satellite networks is to provide Internet and/or cell phone service everywhere on earth, as well as to facilitate the Internet of Things. All will shoot focused beams of radiation at the earth from phased array antennas.

SpaceX, based in the United States, already has approval to operate 12,000 satellites and has filed applications for 30,000 more. More than 1,300 have already been launched. At least initially, these satellites are for Internet only and will not communicate directly with cell phones. Subscribers will purchase a small rooftop dish and a WiFi router. Beta testing by an estimated 10,000 subscribers in the U.S., Canada, U.K., Germany and New Zealand is already happening.

OneWeb, based in the United Kingdon, has aready launched 148 satellites, and plans to begin providing service after it has 250 satellites in orbit. Initial service will be to northern latitude regions, including the UK, Europe, Greenland, Canada, and Alaska. OneWeb plans to provide cell phone as well as Internet service. Subscribers will purchase a small user terminal that will function as a small cell, able to connect to any mobile device in its vicinity. OneWeb has scaled back its planned number of satellites from 49,000 to 7,088. It does not plan to compete directly with SpaceX. Instead it will market its service to airlines, businesses and governments.

Telesat, based in Canada, has increased its planned number of satellites from 117 to 1,671. It, too, is marketing its service to businesses. Its customers will include cruise ships, airlines, and governments. Telesat intends for its satellites to replace terrestrial fiber networks for long-distance communication. “We’re basically deploying a big space-based mesh IP network,” said its CEO Dan Goldberg.

AST & Science
This company, based in the U.S., is designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. But instead of selling its service directly to cell phone users, it will partner with existing cell phone service providers, so that when a cell phone user travels out of range of any cell towers, the cell phone’s signal will automatically be handed off to a satellite. While this company does not plan to have as many satellites as its competitors, the power levels of its communicating beams will be much greater. Its application to the FCC specifies a maximum EIRP (effective radiating power) of up to 79.2 dBW, or more than 83,000,000 watts per beam.

This company, partnering with Lockheed Martin and the U.S. military, is also designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. Its brochure boasts that it will “enable the Internet of Things on a massive new scale.” “Omnispace is honored to have been selected to work with the U.S. Navy and Marines to demonstrate 5G capability from space,” said Campbell Marshall, Vice President for Government and International Markets in a March 15, 2021 interview. Omnispace has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.

Amazon’s application to operate 3,236 satellites was approved by the FCC last July. Like SpaceX, it plans to sell small user terminals to its customers for mounting on rooftops and vehicles.

Like Omnispace and AST & Science, Lynk is designing its satellites to communicate directly with cell phones. Like AST & Science, Lynk has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.

Facebook is planning to launch a constellation of small, 150-pound satellites, called cubesats. It too has an experimental license from the FCC and has not revealed how many satellites it plans to operate.

Arthur Firstenberg
P.O. Box 6216
Santa Fe, NM 87502
phone: +1 505-471-0129
[email protected]
March 27, 2021

The last 15 newsletters, including this one, are available for downloading
and sharing on the
Newsletters page of the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Some of the newsletters are also available there in
German, Spanish, Italian, and French.

Courtesy The Telegraph
This is about 19 Australian ecosystems and more that are being lost.

Although the scientists blame humanity for carbon and pollution I still maintain that the major contributor are the natural 6th extinction cycles which can be found under the 5 extinctions. The 6th is occurring now-- gradual process and build up the signs are and discussed in back POSTS.

Be Well 


                                  HELLO AND WAKE UP UK

I hope and trust my conspiracy 'nose' and perhaps suspicious and cynical attitude at times are mistaken; 

UK extends emergency coronavirus powers by 6 months

British lawmakers have agreed to prolong coronavirus emergency measures for six months, allowing the Conservative government to keep its unprecedented powers to restrict U.K. citizens’ everyday lives

The lifting of the lockdown and all that mask and social distancing was supposed to be eased by 12--21 June 2021 but maybe if the figures are down over the fake virus which has not been identified yet;

 The following exhibit name is protected as there is a law suit in process.

Officially its the flu. “I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I'm a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 "supposed" positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch's postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples. What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. “We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. “We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can't or won't send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs. With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That's because they've never really found the virus, all they've ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway. “So what we're dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud.” 

The PCR tests are useless;


And masks you can find many explanations why they are downright dangerous and we were advised not to wear them;

 The evidence for face coverings is “not very strong in either direction”, the Deputy Chief Medical Officer has admitted, despite a last minute U-turn on masks in schools.....

Prime Minister Boris Johnson insists he does not want to see face coverings in schools

England’s chief medical officer has warned the public wearing face masks will do little to combat the ongoing coronavirus outbreak.

Professor Chris Whitty told Sky News on Wednesday that wearing a face mask had almost no effect on reducing the risk of contracting the illness.

Prof Whitty said: “In terms of wearing a mask, our advice is clear: that wearing a mask if you don’t have an infection reduces the risk almost not at all. So we do not advise that.”

“The only people we do sometimes use masks for are people who have got an infection and that is to help them to stop it spreading around," he added.



 NOW THE NEXT PIECE OF THE JIG SAW --I HOPE I AM                                                              MISTAKEN

British lawmakers have agreed to prolong coronavirus emergency measures for six months, allowing the Conservative government to keep its unprecedented powers to restrict U.K. citizens’ everyday lives

From link below
Sue Mountstevens, Avon and Somerset's police and crime commissioner said the acts showed 'reckless disregard' of people's lives and safety

There have been violent clashes in Bristol, following protests against new laws making their way through Parliament.

The Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill is a mammoth piece of legislation that includes major government proposals on crime and justice in England and Wales. One part of it covers changes to protests.

What powers do police have now; 

There has been protests all over the UK and even 60 MP's protested the rest and labour were gutless short cited myopic dipsticks; why I say this the emergency powers have been extended to September / October 2021 AND I HOPE I AM MISTAKEN;  THE FLU WHICH HAS BEEN CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN OR ADDED TO THE COVID STATISTICS  START IN OCTOBER AND THE JAB WILL BE FORCED OR FEARED INTO and of course the new Edinburgh, the new Argyle, the New Argentinian, the New ????? VARIANT's WILL BE FOUND. 

From back POSTS
This is part of the New World Order Reset and the Davos  220 World Economic Forum in which the Klaus Schwab technocracy and eugenics mob said 'you will be happy not owning anything' read their agenda and we will which they did not say be 'owned by them' another commodity and bargaining chip and ploy . See 'Welcome to Smart City 'POST
How then does this fit in with the New Police Bill; With the lockdowns, social distancing and mask crap to a fake virus a clever manipulation of the graphs and figures, YES there were deaths and they were a bad flu, fear, mask wearing, people stuck in doors sitting on couches watching TV and depression, suicides AND  DEDICTAED HOSPITALS THAT ONLY DEALT WITH COVID AND OF COURSE SHORTAGE AND PRESSURE whilst other hospitals were empty.(SEE ALL 75 BACK POSTS) and big 1,000 bed tent hospitals never used and billions.
SO they broke the back of most small businesses AND NOW THE FEW that remain they want to break AND SO come October ITS BACK oh  GOD no please, no more lock downs, distancing ANYTHING BUT THAT and so finally breaking the rest of the small business and breaking the backs and minds the last straw that broke the camels back and we are done, more schools at home, extreme riots and anger HENCE THE NEW POLICE POWERS. As I say I hope I am mistaken.

From Back POSTS

another set of figures in 2021

Wednesday 24 March 2021



Courtesy Imgflip

The Thing is folks there is a lot of text and I hope it does affect you. These are templates for writing to the authorities and information laid out for the future and correspondence. I understand if this is too much, so I will be back to the usual next time. However a huge welcome and lots of love. (Some people these days are afraid of the word love and its connotations, so lots of good healthy thoughts and compassion).  Should the text that follows not interest you scroll down to another few items of a different nature.

Dr Joseph Mercola  Courtesy Singularity Weblog
Below this is taken from Mercola.com any missing videos will be found on his site as he has been deplatformed and censored. Joseph Mercola is a brave and courageous person and for me I admire him immensely.

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, a general practitioner in Cheshire, England, and the author of three books, including “Statin Nation,” has made it his mission to add some balance to the widespread fear-mongering that occurs at the hands of the health care lobby and media.(use search bar in POST as I have Posted him several times, he was brave enough to say they all were signing Covid on everything medical certificates and no one picked him and doubted him)

“In a world where the truth can be, literally, turned upside down, how can you know what to believe, and who to believe?” he asks. His blog attempts to “dig down to find the meaning behind the headlines,” and one of his recent posts centred on COVID-19 and the “impossible things” — some might call them lies — that are being propagated in its name.1

Courtesy Medium

Top Eight COVID Lies

Kendrick’s post takes aim at widespread COVID-themed disinformation, highlighting six top inconsistencies. I’ve added two more as well.

1.No Such Thing as Herd Immunity — Except From Vaccines — Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached. Prior to the introduction of vaccines, all herd immunity was achieved via exposure to and recovery from an infectious disease.

Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior illness but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that can occur after vaccination.

In the case of COVID-19, however, we’ve been told that the idea of natural herd immunity to COVID-19 is not achievable — and even considering that it could be is “deadly and dangerous.”2 Yet, a curious thing happened. When vaccines became available, the idea of vaccine-induced herd immunity to COVID-19 became widespread. According to Kendrick:3

“First, I was told that attempting to create herd immunity was not achievable. It would also be extremely dangerous and would inevitably result in many hundreds of thousands of excess deaths.

Then the vaccines arrived at fantastical speed and I was told that mass vaccination, by creating herd immunity, would be the factor that would allow us to conquer COVID19 and return to normal life. I am not entirely sure which of these things is impossible, but one of them must be.”

2.Vaccines Induce ‘Stronger and Longer Lasting Immunity’ — In February 2021, The HuffPost reported that the COVID-19 vaccine would “induce stronger and longer lasting immunity” than the immunity induced by natural infection.4 However, an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, Dr. Meryl Nass, suggests the protection the COVID vaccine provides will be inferior to that acquired via natural infection:

“No one knows how long immunity lasts, if in fact the vaccines do provide some degree of immunity … For every known vaccine, the immunity it provides is less robust and long-lasting than the immunity obtained from having had the infection.

People who have had Covid really have no business getting vaccinated — they get all the risk and none of the benefit.”

In the U.S., the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises people who have previously been infected with COVID-19 to still get vaccinated, even though trials suggest there’s no benefit in this population. A CDC report also incorrectly cited the vaccine’s effectiveness for those previously infected, prompting one congressman to say they’re “lying.”

In a high-profile report issued by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 15 scientists stated that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine had “consistent high efficacy” of 92% or more among people with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.5

But according to Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky, “That sentence is wrong. There is no efficacy demonstrated in the Pfizer trial among participants with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and actually there's no proof in the Moderna trial either.”6 Kendrick adds:7

“I also know that vaccinations can only ever really create an attenuated response. Whereas a full-blown infection triggers a full-blown immune response.

So, I think it is pretty close to impossible that vaccination can provide greater protection than that from getting the actual disease. Which is why I think it is utterly bonkers we are actually vaccinating people who have circulating antibodies in their blood.”

3.Universal Mask Use Is Essential to Stop COVID-19 — It’s been touted that face masks are essential to stopping the spread of COVID-19 and could save 130,000 lives in the U.S. alone.8 But in 2019, the World Health Organization analyzed 10 randomized controlled trials and concluded, “there was no evidence that facemasks are effective in reducing transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”9

Only one randomized controlled trial has been conducted on mask usage and COVID-19 transmission, and it found masks did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection.10

“Never has a trial been subjected to such immediate and hostile reporting. Fact-checkers (whoever exactly they might be, or what understanding they have of medical research) immediately attacked it,” Kendrick noted, adding:11

“Yes, we have now entered a world when political fact checkers feel free to attack and contradict the findings of scientific papers, using such scientific terms as ‘Mostly false’ … Ignoring the modern-day Spanish Inquisition, and their ill-informed criticisms, I will simply call this study.

More evidence that face masks don’t work. Perhaps someone will come along with a study proving that face masks work. So far … nada. Another impossible thing.”

4.COVID-19 Death Statistics — The positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for COVID-19 are plagued with problems, one of which is that they are not designed to be used as diagnostic tools as they cannot distinguish between inactive (noninfectious) viruses and "live" or reproductive ones.12

If you have a nonreproductive virus in your body, you will not get sick from it and you cannot spread it to others. Further, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing "positive.” These false positive tests, in turn, can contribute to the number of people dying “with” COVID-19, but not actually dying “of” the disease.

“[W]e have the very strange concept that any death within twenty-eight days of a positive COVID19 swab is recorded as a COVID19 death,” Kendrick said, explaining:13

“You can have a positive swab long after you have been infected — and recovered. There are just some bits of virus up your nose that can be magnified, through the wonders of the PCR test, into a positive result.

Which means that an elderly person, infected months ago, can be admitted to hospital for any reason whatsoever. The they can have a positive swab — everyone is swabbed. Then they can die, from whatever it was they were admitted for in the first place. Then, they will be recorded as a COVID19 death.

In truth, this is just the start of impossible things when it comes to the number of COVID19 deaths. Do not get me started on PCR cycle numbers, and false positives. We would be here all day.”

5.The Swedish COVID-19 Response Was a Disaster — Sweden handled the pandemic differently than most of the globe, and has been chided for its looser restrictions and lack of severe lockdowns. In October 2020, TIME called the Swedish COVID-19 response a “disaster,”14 but Kendrick cites data showing that the death rate in Sweden in 2020 was right in line with other years — nothing out of the ordinary.15

When Kendrick compared the number of deaths in Sweden in 2012 — one of their highest death statistics — to 2020, the difference between absolute death rate in 2012 and 2020 is 0.012%.

“That is 120 extra deaths per million of the population, which is 1,224 people in a population of 10.2 million. The statistics tell us that twelve thousand people died from COVID19 in Sweden. Maybe you can make all that add up. Frankly, I find it impossible.”16

6.Lockdowns Have Worked — Available data reveal lockdowns have been completely ineffective at lowering positive test rates, while extracting a huge cost in terms of human suffering and societal health.

Using data from the Worldometer,17 Kendrick compiled a list of the countries with the highest rate of COVID-19, based on deaths per million of the population. Every country on the list, which included the U.K., Italy, the U.S., Spain, Mexico and others, had “fairly strict” lockdowns.

Four countries that have been criticized for not having strict lockdowns — Sweden, Japan, Belarus and Nicaragua — did not make the list, and have an average death rate of 391 per million. In contrast, the top 20 “lockdown” countries have an average death rate of 1,520 per million. According to Kendrick:18

“Yet although this evidence is out there, I am being asked to believe that lockdowns work. At least the WHO agrees with me on this impossible thing.

As Dr. David Nabarro, the WHO special envoy on COVID19 said‘We really do appeal to all world leaders, stop using lockdown as your primary method of control. Lockdowns have just one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer.’19

7.Asymptomatic Spreaders Are Driving the Pandemic — The reasoning given for lockdowns, masks and social distancing is to stop the spread of disease among people who are asymptomatic. It’s common sense to stay home if you’re sick and exhibiting symptoms, but for people who feel healthy, the institution of lockdowns to prevent asymptomatic spread is unprecedented.

Yet, during a June 8, 2020, press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, the World Health Organization's technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that asymptomatic transmission is very rare, meaning an individual who tests positive but does not exhibit symptoms is highly unlikely to transmit live virus to others.

A study in Nature Communications also found "there was no evidence of transmission from asymptomatic positive persons to traced close contacts."20 When they further tested asymptomatic patients for antibodies, they discovered that 190 of the 300, or 63.3%, had actually had a "hot" or productive infection resulting in the production of antibodies. Still, none of their contacts had been infected.21

8.The Virus Didn’t Come From a Lab Accident — Despite the complete absence of a plausible zoonotic origin theory, WHO’s investigative commission, tasked with identifying the origin of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has officially cleared the Wuhan Institute of Virology and two other biosafety level 4 laboratories in Wuhan of wrongdoing, saying these labs had nothing to do with the COVID-19 outbreak.22

The WHO investigation was riddled with conflicts of interest from the start, and no credible theory for natural zoonotic spillover has been presented to date. However, there are at least four distinct lab origin theories, including the serial passage theory, which proposes the virus was created by serial passaging through an animal host or cell culture, as well as evidence for genetic manipulation.23

You may be wondering, if there’s so much evidence pointing toward a lab origin, why are leading health authorities and scientists dismissing it all and insisting SARS-CoV-2 is a natural occurrence, mysterious as it might be?

Should the COVID-19 pandemic be officially recognized as the result of a lab accident, the world might be forced to take a cold hard look at gain-of-function research that allows for the creation of these new pathogens. The end result would ideally be the banning of such research worldwide, with significant financial repercussions, the ending of prestigious careers in that realm and potential criminal charges for those involved as well.

In the face of misinformation and manipulation, what you can do now is keep your eyes open and your ears tuned to the science, so you don’t fall victim to the unnecessary panic and fear, or the increased surveillance and control, that is being created.

From Article above if not found or taken down use link below


Courtesy Indiatimes.com

 Some technology from Space a knee support.



FAO the Cabinet Office,


I am writing in response to your call for evidence on COVID-status certification.


In summary, my view is that the Government should not support domestic COVID-status certification and, owing to profound civil liberties, rights and equality concerns, should legislate to prohibit private companies from using COVID-status certification as a requirement for customers and staff alike. I believe this is vital for the Government to uphold its duty to protect human rights and prevent discrimination.


I also wish to state at the outset of my response that I am concerned about the validity of this review. Four days after this call for evidence was opened, the Culture Secretary was reported to be planning the use of COVID-status certificates for large stadium events this summer. I am deeply concerned by the prospect that the Prime Minister, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, the Minister for COVID-19 Vaccine Deployment among others may have misled parliament and the public by not only issuing assurances that there was no intention to use vaccine passports at all, but by later planning their use just days after opening a review to consider whether their use would be lawful, ethical or effective. 


Question 1


Which of the following best describes the capacity in which you are responding to this call for evidence?


I am a:


g) Individual


Question 2


In your view, what are the key considerations, including opportunities and risks, associated with a potential COVID-status certification scheme? We would welcome specific reference to:


a) clinical / medical considerations


The professed purpose of a COVID-status certificate is to create environments where the risk of transmitting coronavirus is negligible by requiring evidence of a vaccination or test result as a condition of entry.


Firstly, I believe the Government’s priority ought to be protecting those most vulnerable to the virus – which has now happened. The Government reported that 93% of over 75s have received a vaccination and vaccine uptake for younger people at comparatively lower risk continues to be remarkably high. The vaccine deployment success among those most vulnerable to coronavirus means hospitalisations and excess deaths are certain to fall, and onerous controls on society are not justifiable.


Secondly, vaccination status is an invalid basis on which to declare an individual as at low risk of transmission. There is currently no conclusive, peer-reviewed evidence on the effect of the COVID vaccines on transmission of the virus, and very little on vaccines and COVID transmission relating to the older age groups.


The insufficiency of evidence on the impact of COVID vaccines on transmission of the virus is one of the reasons that the WHO advises against vaccine requirements as a condition of international travel. However, if the vaccines do significantly reduce transmission, infection rates and thus deaths will reduce even faster, rendering onerous controls such as COVID-status certificates even less necessary and even more disproportionate.


Whilst evidence on the impact of COVID vaccines on transmissibility of the virus is insufficient, mass testing would be the assumed condition of entry via COVID-status certificates. The proposed method would be to use rapid Lateral Flow Tests (LFTs). Firstly, coerced medical testing of healthy people without any symptoms of coronavirus, especially when the vulnerable population has been vaccinated and the overall impact of coronavirus is vastly reduced, is incredibly difficult to medically justify. Secondly, LFTs are only a useful indicator of infections when the true infection rate in the general population is high. As set out in the Royal Statistical Society COVID-19 Taskforce on 5th March 2021: “while the usual concern with LFTs is false negatives, when infection-prevalence is low there is also a risk that the majority of 'positive' tests could be false positives.” This means individuals (and by proxy their friends, family, colleagues, and anyone else they have come into contact with) could be wrongly denied their rights, falsely denied paid-for products, services or events, and needless panic could be caused which would be harmful both to the reopening of the economy and to individuals’ rights.


As an alternative during this period of exiting lockdown, I believe the emphasis should be on strong medical support for those who are infected, rather than treating the whole nation as potentially infectious. This means encouraging and supporting people to isolate and take a reliable test either following the onset of COVID symptoms or exposure to an individual who has tested positive via a reliable test, and improving the NHS Test and Trace system.


b) legal, (ethical and equalities) considerations


The effect of COVID-status certification would be to socially and economically exclude people without a COVID vaccine or recent test result and deny them basic freedoms. In doing so, some of the most marginalised in society would suffer either direct or indirect discrimination.


Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Equality Act 2010 protect individuals from unlawful discrimination. Under equality law, it is unlawful to discriminate against people with ‘protected characteristics’, many of which are engaged by COVID-status certificate proposals, including age, disability, pregnancy and religion or belief.


If the Government allows society to be segregated according to vaccination status:


Young people would be discriminated against, since there will be lower and slower vaccine uptake as young people are both generally at a low risk of serious illness from the virus and last in line to be offered a vaccination. Children are not eligible for vaccines as trials are ongoing. Further, if vaccines are required annually/periodically, young people could be discriminated against on a corresponding cycle as they will always be last in line to receive vaccines.


Disabled people could be discriminated against as some medical conditions prevent individuals from being able to receive a vaccination.


Pregnant women would be discriminated against, as covid vaccines are not routinely advised for them and whilst clinical trials are ongoing, women may be cautious about vaccines whilst pregnant, breastfeeding or trying to conceive.


Some people with religious or other beliefs may be discriminated against, if those beliefs deter them from receiving a vaccine.


Discrimination, inequality and unfairness would be caused not only by medical eligibility for vaccination but by accessibility of vaccinations. Research indicates that people from ethnic minority groups, people with lower levels of education and lower incomes are the most ‘hesitant’ or unlikely to receive COVID vaccines (Fancourt, Paul & Steptoe 2020). Further, many of the estimated 1 million undocumented migrants in the UK are fearful of accessing health services due to punitive data sharing as part of hostile environment policies and may be more apprehensive still if COVID-status certificates become an everyday requirement. We cannot simply erase histories and experiences of discrimination and hostility that have created distrust. In fact, vaccine segregation would only deepen discrimination and alienate people even more. This would be disastrous for trust in public health authorities when trust has never been needed more.


Finally, there are billions of citizens of the world who simply will not have access to COVID vaccines for several years to come. As we emerge from the pandemic, disproportionate vaccine requirements should not unfairly impede the rights and freedom of movement of individuals from lower-income countries.


The alternative to vaccination evidence, which is a recent test result, also carries legal and ethical problems. Firstly, under even the most extreme UK law, required medical testing is only possible if an individual is known to be potentially infectious (Coronavirus Act 2020). Further, pre-existing public health law only allows a medical examination to be ordered by a magistrate if a person is believed to be infected or contaminated (Health and Social Care Act 2008). However, COVID-status certificates would effectively make medical testing mandatory for all, treating all citizens – and particularly those with protected characteristics who are unable to receive a vaccination – as potentially infectious. The onerous burden of healthy people having to undergo frequent medical testing in order to enjoy basic rights could also lead to a loss of earnings and, if/when tests are no longer free, could incur financial penalties.


c) operational / delivery considerations


The cost to the public purse of mass testing and the development of a mass COVID-status certification infrastructure is likely to be astronomical, despite the lack of benefits and severe risks.


d) considerations relating to the operation of venues that could use a potential COVID-status certification scheme


COVID-status certification would be burdensome for venues which would not only be liable to legal challenges from customers and staff, but have to undertake to verify a genuine COVID-status and deny entry to individuals without one. In most public environments such as supermarkets, shopping centres, entertainment venues and restaurants etc. there are no access control mechanisms meaning venues would have to create checkpoints for customers and staff to enter and install security staff to enforce requirements. This would not only lead to increased costs for venues but the likelihood of conflict and altercations and increasingly oppressive environment for citizens.  


e) considerations relating to the responsibilities or actions of employers under a potential COVID-status certification scheme.


The legal issues outlined above apply to employers, who cannot unlawfully discriminate against current or potential employees. Even if an employer believes they are able to lawfully offer a general service (e.g. a cruise) to exclusively vaccinated individuals, it would be wrong and potentially unlawful to demand that current or prospective staff undergo medical treatment (e.g. vaccination) or medical testing (e.g. LFT) as a condition of employment. These issues merit serious consideration.


f) ethical considerations


See (b)


g) equalities considerations


See (b)


h) privacy considerations


COVID-status certificates present an unprecedented privacy intrusion. Never before have individuals needed to demonstrate their health status or indeed any medical information to enjoy day to day freedoms. The requirement to use an app or, for individuals without a smart phone, a QR code relating to sensitive medical data engages Article 8 privacy rights, GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018. This privacy intrusion would be widespread and, in my view, challengeable.


The UK has a proud history of opposition to ID cards. We are not a papers-carrying country. COVID-status certificates would turn us into a two-tier, checkpoint society where we each have to show an app or certificate simply in order to enjoy public life. This would be a serious break from our long-guarded democratic traditions, respect of privacy, and would most disadvantage marginalised people. The combination of apps with sensitive health data and the subversion of everyday businesses and events into checkpoints could constitute the biggest expansion of surveillance ever seen in the UK.


Further, many health data apps are accessed via biometric facial recognition. The requirement to use facial recognition engages GDPR/DPA rights and individuals should have a right to refuse. Further, facial recognition algorithms suffer from inaccuracy and have particular issues accurately recognising women and people of colour (NIST). Such apps would be likely to compound discrimination issues and may wrongly obstruct individuals from enjoying their rights and freedoms.


It has been suggested that exemptions could be created to allow certain unvaccinated people with protected characteristics into spaces governed by COVID-status certificates and/or where only vaccinated people are permitted. As outlined above, I believe there would be serious legal and ethical issues with such controls – but there would be serious privacy issues too. Others may deduce that the exempt or unvaccinated individual has health problems, is pregnant, or has a certain belief system. This is not only an invasion of privacy but could lead to disadvantageous treatment, particularly in an employment context.


Bodily autonomy is an important aspect of the right to privacy. Compulsory vaccination, as an involuntary medical treatment, amounts to an interference with the right to a private life (Solomakhin v Ukraine).


I believe individuals have the right to make their own choices about their own bodies. UK laws generally respect medical consent and mandatory vaccines are prohibited under the Public Health Act. However, COVID-status certificates would clearly cause people to feel coerced into receiving vaccines to avoid the onerous alternative of constant medical tests or, worse, reduced freedoms. They would have a similar effect to mandatory vaccine policies, which are typically imposed by exclusion or penalties for those who decline vaccines. The penalty of reduced liberties for otherwise healthy individuals who decline a certain medical treatment or test would mark a grave change in our public health system and rights record as a whole.


Question 3


Are there any other comments you would like to make to inform the COVID-status certification review?


Yours sincerely


[Your name]

 Apologies if this bored the what so names off of you.

Unless there is absolute PROOF that the vaccine prevents TRANSMISSION of the virus, then there is absolutely NO REASON to have vaccine PASSPORTS., also the WHO has said it's unethical and impractical- still they'll try domestically.

Courtesy  Earth Changes Media 
I have stacks and stacks on this subject in loads and loads of POSTS back and a great example from WTDDY, spaceweather.com and my research can be found;

POST 369. TRUST. Monday 20th May 2019 

Long-Term Study of Heart Rate VSPACE WEATHER BALLOON DATA: Approximately once a week, Spaceweather.com and the students of Earth to Sky Calculus fly space weather balloons to the stratosphere over California. These balloons are equipped with radiation sensors that detect cosmic rays, a surprisingly "down to Earth" form of space weather. Cosmic rays can seed cloudstrigger lightning, and penetrate commercial airplanes. Furthermore, there are studies ( #1#2#3#4) linking cosmic rays with cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in the general population. Our latest measurements show that cosmic rays are intensifying, with an increase of more than 18% since 2015 (courtesy to spaceweather.com  where you can get daily forecasts) A thought how much of this affected Covid cases and made them vulnerable to this bad flu as you will see in 2019 blog and rea the # tags and in particular information in their articles about solar minimum and my repeated updates way back to take care if you will during solar minimum.

 variability Responses to Changes in the Solar and Geomagnetic Environment



Just shows what goes on around the world--wars and rumour s of wars and actual wars.
In the next blog the startling revelations and actual contracts that are being given out to space technology and this is just a tip of the iceberg. I could put at least a dozen or more and its all cyber, space, 5G and satellites and a UN and congress law that forbids 'exotic weaponry which the law lists as existing and includes CHEMTRAILS which have vehemently denied and ignored so until  next time. 

Be Well

www.shackisback.blogspot  has now got a few more, these are my memoirs, experiences, observations, short anecdotes, koans and riddles with prose, at the moment 955 to pick up and browse. Shack is one of nicknames.