Thursday 29 January 2015


Hello.  When I was a lad we had a very rude poem which started ' Oh dear what can the matter be two old ladies locked in a lavatory, they've been there from Sunday to Saturday, I wonder what the matter could be'.  Well there is more I cannot remember it and do not want too.  Anyway greetings folks and hope your ablutions are not so lengthy or laborious. 
Not quite like a lavatory, it's the nearest I could get.
I live in sheltered Housing, or rather was sheltered housing, until the authorities decided they could not afford a scheme manager, long story why I had to live here.  Anyway there are many elderly women and men, I suppose at 76 years young I am as well, however, I like my neighbours they are generally more sensible and wise than most and in some cases great fun.
The point being that politically, religiously and media wise we all are or seem to be going down the pan or tubes and we all seem locked in the global lavatory.  As above alcohol, distraction and release from the pain of world events are being adequately supplied by the media and employed to take our eye off of the terrible corruption and maiming going on. More football, darts, soaps, violent films, games, cartoons and toys. More open sex programmes getting ever risky and provocative. More expensive wages for footballers and celebrities.  So the merry go round is in full swing, more world war threats, more deliberate false flags. One day it will explode, hopefully a cleansing.
I feel the image above depicts a view which I have felt since the early 70's that the world will have to go through a cleansing, a purification and every demonic, horrendous, monstrous atrocity will have to come out and be purified.
I feel the monster is coming out of the deep, the depths of depravity, debauchery, violence, lust and social depravity and amoral dysfunctions.
The boil has to be lanced or has been, I think the first atom bomb  test by Oppenheimer rent the veil of material world and let lose a 'nuclear reaction' in the collective unconscious and the waves are still lifting the veil as above.
When the global mind unconscious really wakes up to the fact most of anything is 99% empty.
I realised when I studied quantum stuff that the ego, which in my view is a bunch of collective programmes encased in a magnetised containment field and appears to be real, only because it is impacted, ground in, etched and pummelled, pressed down and made solid, indeed like the trillions of billions of atoms that make everything from stars, to humans, to animals, to infinity so to speak. So we are all brain washed to some extent, hand me downs from far and distant generations, and change challenged defiantly.
iqballatif.newsvine. com
So in a sense we are a dual personality, who we are at source and then the overlaying programmes, so this entity with a life separate from source has to have a guardian, a sentinel, a defence ministry and of course like most religions, sects, governments it has a defence and attack programme and strategies.  The main one is the council or ministry of FEAR, this is the main defence Boss, deciding attack, defend or some strategy.
As many a teacher has said we need to awaken from the dream. In the light of the above the dream is being seduced, that form, so called solids, semi solids are real in and everlasting.  So this dream when busted, opened can be threatening to the ego which tries to solidify everything.  Health issues, mortality issues, war, hunger, tragedies,  meditation, contemplation can shake one up and so produce a profound change in attitude, ego make up and the ego can reel from a huge body blow. A gut wrenching experience.
So the ego being or sensing it is a separate unit, form in a solid world, then begins to find out, if it ever does, it is limited, the host flesh body dies, be it a planet, star or a human flesh body.  This is indeed a wake up call, eat healthy, exercise, dam it I am going to die I will smoke, drink, I will ----------?  Nothing seems to put of that inevitable day--- I will die, perish, oh boy, I accept death is oblivion, is it? What about reincarnation, oh that's old lady in the lavatory isn't it? 
Then perhaps one accepts the ego as a temporary, transient being, and just simply accepts that is a tool for living in this Earth environment, no big deal. No way I want to be a quadrillion Billionaire, I want to rule the world, you wimps are afraid, get out there join the club, crap on the weak, just use them for getting more power, rule them, make them sick sell them drugs to make them better and make money out of their weakness.  Where  have I heard this before.
Do we have to wait that long as above. Maybe we have to let the puss, the putrid effluence vent out. After all we have to tend to our own boil or cancer first.
Courtesy googleimages
Of course the ideal would be the middle way, not so much the middle class. The balance point between extremes, the pivot, and on examination the pivot point can be likened to the Centre Of Gravity, the turning point, the middle of the wheel where all the spokes of Life emanate from.  Where is this in the human, form wise below the navel, mind wise, in the calm unthinking mind, a mind at rest, enjoying its serenity, one feels peace, well being and compassion and so in an apparently meek state owns the world, not as a possession but a feeling bon ami, a feeling of agape. Perhaps this could be a way for the meek to inherit the Earth  
SOMETHING AMAZING HAPPENING AT JUPITER: Jupiter and Earth are converging for a (relatively) close encounter in early February when the giant planet is at opposition--that is, directly opposite the sun in the midnight sky. This sets the stage for an extraordinary sequence of events. For the next couple of months, backyard sky watchers can see the moons of Jupiter executing a complex series of mutual eclipses and transits. Astrophotographer "Shiraishi" Kumagaya-shi, Saitama, Japan, captured this example on Jan. 17th:
"First, Ganymede partially eclipsed Callisto; then Europa partially eclipsed Io," says Shiraishi. "I did not need a telescope. To photograph this double mutual event, I used a Nikon Coolpix P510 digital camera set at ISO 800 for a series of 1/10s exposures."
The moons of Jupiter will be passing in front of one another and in front of Jupiter with fair frequency through March 2015 and beyond. This is happening because Jupiter's opposition on Feb. 6th coincides almost perfectly with its equinox on Feb. 5th (when the Sun crosses Jupiter's equatorial plane). It is an edge-on apparition of the giant planet that lends itself to eclipses, occulations and transits.
The next big event is right around the corner. On Jan. 24, 2015, beginning at approximately 06:26 UT (1:26 AM EST), the three moons Io, Callisto and Europa will simultaneously cast their inky shadows on Jupiter's cloudtops. This is called a "triple shadow transit," and it is rare. The timing favors observers in North America where the planet will be shining high in the sky in the constellation Leo. Anyone with a backyard telescope is encouraged to watch this easy-to-observe event. (Advice: Start watching at least 30 minutes ahead of time.)(Courtesy

SIMON WATKINS: Decision to let franc float is clear signal that Switzerland expects massive pressure on euro

Europe could be on the brink of a fresh financial crisis. A storm of economic and political events is gathering which at the very least will set financial markets into a flurry and could create new threats to recovery across the region. Britain will not be free from its effects.
The unprecedented jump in the Swiss franc last week was the clearest symptom. The Swiss central bank abandoned efforts to stop its currency rising against the euro. 
Its previous policy had been to try to stop cash flooding into Switzerland from other European countries. Its decision to let the franc float represents a sudden, unexpected abandonment of that policy. It is also a clear signal that Switzerland expects massive pressure on the euro
6 mins.
Russel Brand  ---- a good 8 mins.
A shock--- wow and good grief.15 mins
Mass Extinction.  This backs up my theories to a point or so.  I have espoused for a long time that climate change is cyclic and is backed by some NASA SCIENTISTS AND ASTRONAUTS SEE LAST POST.
So you want to go to Mars?  11 mins.
A fascinating on animal hibernation(courtesy of

GCHQ captured emails of journalists from top international media

• Snowden files reveal emails of BBC, NY Times and more
• Agency includes investigative journalists on ‘threat’ list

The journalists’ communications were among 70,000 emails harvested in less than 10 minutes on one day in November 2008 by GCHQ. Photograph: GCHQ/EPA
GCHQ’s bulk surveillance of electronic communications has scooped up emails to and from journalists working for some of the US and UK’s largest media organisations, analysis of documents released by whistleblower Edward Snowden reveals.
Emails from the BBC, Reuters, the Guardian, the New York Times, Le Monde, the Sun, NBC and the Washington Post were saved by GCHQ and shared on the agency’s intranet as part of a test exercise by the signals intelligence agency.
The disclosure comes as the British government faces intense pressure to protect the confidential communications of reporters, MPs and lawyers from snooping.
The journalists’ communications were among 70,000 emails harvested in the space of less than 10 minutes on one day in November 2008 by one of GCHQ’s numerous taps on the fibre-optic cables that make up the backbone of the internet.
The communications, which were sometimes simple mass-PR emails sent to dozens of journalists but also included correspondence between reporters and editors discussing stories, were retained by GCHQ and were available to all cleared staff on the agency intranet. There is nothing to indicate whether or not the journalists were intentionally targeted.
The mails appeared to have been captured and stored as the output of a then-new tool being used to strip irrelevant data out of the agency’s tapping process.
New evidence from other UK intelligence documents revealed by Snowden also shows that a GCHQ information security assessment listed “investigative journalists” as a threat in a hierarchy alongside terrorists or hackers.
Senior editors and lawyers in the UK have called for the urgent introduction of a freedom of expression law amid growing concern over safeguards proposed by ministers to meet concerns over the police use of surveillance powers linked to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Ripa).
More than 100 editors, including those from all the national newspapers, have signed a letter, coordinated by the Society of Editors and Press Gazette, to the UK prime minister, David Cameron, protesting at snooping on journalists’ communications.
In the wake of terror attacks on the Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish grocer in Paris, Cameron has renewed calls for further bulk-surveillance powers, such as those which netted these journalistic communications.
Ripa has been used to access journalists’ communications without a warrrant, with recent cases including police accessing the phone records of Tom Newton-Dunn, the Sun’s political editor, over the Plebgate investigation. The call records of Mail on Sunday reporters involved in the paper’s coverage of Chris Huhne’s speeding row were also accessed in this fashion.
Under Ripa, neither the police nor the security services need to seek the permission of a judge to investigate any UK national’s phone records – instead, they must obtain permission from an appointed staff member from the same organisation, not involved in their investigation.
However, there are some suggestions in the documents that the collection of billing data by GCHQ under Ripa goes wider – and that it may not be confined to specific target individuals.
A top secret document discussing Ripa initially explains the fact that billing records captured under Ripa are available to any government agency is “unclassified” provided that there is “no mention of bulk”.
The GCHQ document goes on to warn that the fact that billing records “kept under Ripa are not limited to warranted targets” must be kept as one of the agency’s most tightly guarded secrets, at a classification known as “Top secret strap 2”.
That is two levels higher than a normal top secret classification – as it refers to “HMG [Her Majesty’s government] relationships with industry that have areas of extreme sensitivity”.
Internal security advice shared among the intelligence agencies was often as preoccupied with the activities of journalists as with more conventional threats such as foreign intelligence, hackers or criminals.
One restricted document intended for those in army intelligence warned that “journalists and reporters representing all types of news media represent a potential threat to security”.
It continued: “Of specific concern are ‘investigative journalists’ who specialise in defence-related exposés either for profit or what they deem to be of the public interest.
“All classes of journalists and reporters may try either a formal approach or an informal approach, possibly with off-duty personnel, in their attempts to gain official information to which they are not entitled.”
It goes on to caution “such approaches pose a real threat”, and tells staff they must be “immediately reported” to the chain-of-command.
GCHQ information security assessments, meanwhile, routinely list journalists between “terrorism” and “hackers” as “influencing threat sources”, with one matrix scoring journalists as having a “capability” score of two out of five, and a “priority” of three out of five, scoring an overall “low” information security risk.
Terrorists, listed immediately above investigative journalists on the document, were given a much higher “capability” score of four out of five, but a lower “priority” of two. The matrix concluded terrorists were therefore a “moderate” information security risk.
A spokesman for GCHQ said: “It is longstanding policy that we do not comment on intelligence matters. Furthermore, all of GCHQ’s work is carried out in accordance with a strict legal and policy framework, which ensures that our activities are authorised, necessary and proportionate, and that there is rigorous oversight, including from the secretary of state, the interception and intelligence services commissioners and the parliamentary intelligence and security committee.
“All our operational processes rigorously support this position. In addition, the UK’s interception regime is entirely compatible with the European convention on human rights.”
This exactly why Bilderbug Cameron wants to come out of the human rights act and out of Europe which to some extent at the moment roughly adheres to the law of rights, of course only when it suits them.
Furthermore they will use ‘false flag’ operations to increase the terror and fear of terrorism and so the net is used as an excuse. Do you really think terrorists would use the net when they know they are being listened too, the so called chatter.  Yes I can see the haemorrhoidal twitching of the bloated illuminati wanting to cover up their deception.  You can see with mobile / cell phones most people aufey with technology they are being caught out red handed, their mistake is not estimating their cover ups, perhaps now they do so they are trying to shut up the net and keep their dirty bloody hands looking clean----shame on you.
This very, very, very, interesting, there are some interesting videos in this link above. The USA is worried over the popularity of RT and the like, this is why they are trying hard to get the Net shut down and make it offence to look at these broadcasts.  The so called slow lane.  The Chief said that RT, Boko Harem and IS were in the same sort of boat, caused an uproar see the short videos above. It is interesting that illuminati Cameron met illuminati Obama to see if they could snoop and spy more.

Chronic Disease Has Risen in Lockstep with sugar Consumption

However we can be sweet in thoughts deeds and charity.
Keep Sweet, Be Well.  Geoff

Friday 23 January 2015


Hi This is a special greeting on a special subject.
I know you must be fed up with the subject however, I urge you to watch this 61 min documentary, and I know it is with translation and can be irksome.
Absolutely Brilliant and really worth looking at. 

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, Met Office report reveals: MoS got it right about warming... so who are the 'deniers' now?

Last year The Mail on Sunday reported a stunning fact: that global warming had ‘paused’ for 16 years. The Met Office’s own monthly figures showed there had been no statistically significant increase in the world’s temperature since 1997.
We were vilified. One Green website in the US said our report was ‘utter bilge’ that had to be ‘exposed and attacked’.
The Met Office issued a press release claiming it was misleading, before quietly admitting a few days later that it was true that the world had not got significantly warmer since 1997 after all. A Guardian columnist wondered how we could be ‘punished’( Quote from article)

49 Former NASA Scientists Send A Letter Disputing Climate Change

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden
Is NASA playing fast and loose with climate change science? That's the contention of a group of 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts. 
On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.
"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."
The group features some marquee names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA's Johnson Space Centre in Houston.
The letter included a request for NASA to refrain from mentioning CO2 as a cause of global warming in future press releases and websites. The agency's "Global Climate Change" web page says that "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change."
HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.
49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.
H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.
“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”
Select excerpts from the letter: 
  • “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
  • “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
  • “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”
The full text of the letter:
March 28, 2012
The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
Dear Charlie,
We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.
For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.
Thank you for considering this request.
(Attached signatures)
CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science
CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center
Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.
/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years
/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years
/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years
/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years
/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years
/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years
/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years
/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years
/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years
/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years
/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years
/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years
/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years
/s/ Anita Gale
/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years
/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years
/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years
/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years
/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years
/s/ Thomas J. Harmon
/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years
/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years
/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years
/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years
/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years
/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years
/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years
/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen
/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years
/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years
/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years
/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years
/s/ Tom Ohesorge
/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years
/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years
/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years
/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years
/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years
/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years
/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years
/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years
/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years
/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years
/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years
/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years

Secret of China's people who live to old age. 15 mins

Abby Martin on Afghanistan.  The drugs are the real cause. 4 mins.
Access Express | 01/16/15
Please Google and read. 
Illuminati Cameron wants a huge downer on the Internet.  Read in above Access before it is too late.  He is a Fracker, a Fluoride lover and in love with GMO foods.  
This evening's clip is a corollary 
to the one broadcast this morning, 
captured by the TV channel, 
France 24, in which we see that 
the Charlie Hebdo "terrorist" either 
shot a blank at the cop, who was on 
the ground, allegedly wounded and 
defenseless on his back, to receive 
the bullet that was aimed at his head, 
at point blank range, to be coldly 
"finished off." 
There's what looks to me an outside 
possibility that a real bullet was shot; 
but that it missed and bounced off the 
sidewalk. However, due to the lack of 
any damage to the sidewalk, to say 
nothing of the lack of any damage to 
the cop's head, which would have 
exploded like a watermelon, from a 
7.32x09mm round shot at point blank 
range and the lack of any sign of blood
produced by the shot, at the time 
of the attack, per the footage, after 
which the "terrorist" went running back 
to the escape vehicle, it appears to me 
more likely that the "terrorist's" AK-47 
was loaded with blanks. 
(A magazine or more of blanks used in 
the Charlie Hebdo incident could raise 
questions about the status of the rest of 
this shooter's victims. But we'll leave 
that aside, for now).
In this Sky News broadcast, the presenter 
makes a Freudian Slip, when he says: "You 
can see the blood on the ground, which 
has been put there..." The reporter then 
corrects his story, "Because of the blood that 
was shed there yesterday."
I'd go with A) "Put there" because we didn't 
see any B) "Blood...shed there," during the 
shooting, wjhich we saw in this morning's video. 
Not a drop.
The intrepid reporter continues, "The spot 
where he fell, has already been marked by 
candles, by some flowers, which have been 
laid here. This area was largely cordoned of
f last night."
What? So, after a murder, the cops allow 
everyone to pass through the area where  
a fellow cop was murdered, in cold blood
allowing contamination of the crime scene?
My two cents say that when the cameras 
were gone, blood was ladled out upon the 
Parisian sidewalk, in order for the mainstream 
story to coagulate...
Video (2 mins): 
I appreciate the above may anger many of the readers of this Post however, I merely report what I have to report. After all I did with 9 / 11, 7 /9, MH 370 and many others, I have copied this from Forbiddenknowledge and as usual it is up to you to make up your own mind.
This is footage of the Charlie Hebdo 
shootings which has been restricted 
or taken down from a number of 
websites. As you will see, it contains 
no blood, gore or graphic violence.

It does, however punch a major hole 
in the official story. 3 mins
  • Arguments are provided against typical vaccine justifications that diseases like smallpox and polio were eradicated by vaccination
  • Historical data reveals that smallpox was eradicated through efforts like isolation, improved nutrition, hygiene, and sanitation
  • Incidence of polio was dramatically “reduced” because the disease was redefined, and serological testing was introduced—not because of success of the vaccine
Ellen Wood Montage.  5 mins. This remarkable lady keeps on keening on.  Good on yer Ellen.
A REAL EXPERTS OPINION. 2 mins  Best one of all.
The general public will rebel against this and cry conspiracy.  However whilst I deeply and sincerely sympathise and send condolences to the bereaving family's they have a right to know who really murdered their beloved ones.
In Post 165A I mentioned this story briefly 
The headline in the UK today…
A lack of exercise could be killing over 600,000 people in Europe every year, a 12-year study suggests. University of Cambridge researchers said about 676,000 deaths each year were down to inactivity, compared with 337,000 from carrying too much weight.
Extend the same results to North America where the infrastructure is mainly designed for cars and up to 2 million deaths throughout Europe and North America every year could be the direct result of not walking my recommended ‘fast 3-5 miles per day (4-8km)’. This puts it on a par with deaths from medical treatment.
To be Really Clear
The really interesting outcome was that walking was beneficial for people of any weight although obesity and inactivity often go hand in hand. Even more strange is that thin people have a higher risk of health problems if they are inactive. And obese people who exercise are in better health than those that do not.
The study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, attempted to clarify the relative dangers of inactivity and obesity.
The Moral of the Story?
Nancy Sinatra sang, ‘These Boots are made for walking’, but it should have been ‘these legs are made for walking’. Failing to walk every day risks your health, your independence, your sanity and as this study shows, your very life. Strolling around shopping is not walking. Walking is long strides and steady breathing.
See the walking extract taken from my book here: (COURTESY Robert Redfern---'Good Health Naturally).

Positive outlook reduces bone loss and risk of osteoporosis

Post-menopausal women who are satisfied with their lives have higher bone density and are less likely to suffer from osteoporosis, a new study has found.

Women with this positive outlook suffered 52 per cent less bone density loss than others who were dissatisfied with their lives. Changes in attitude over the 10 years of the study also affected bone density levels. Women who became more depressed over the decade saw their bone density weaken by 85 per cent compared to those who maintained a positive outlook, researchers from the Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study discovered.

Earlier studies had found that depression has a negative impact on bone density and the likelihood of osteoporosis, and the researchers wanted to find out if the reverse was also true: that a positive outlook helps maintain bone density levels.
They tracked the mental well-being of 1,147 women, whose bone density levels had been measured in 1999, and asked them about their interest in life, their happiness and whether they were lonely, before carrying out fresh measurements in 2009.

(Source: Psychosomatic Medicine, 2014; 76 (9): 709) (Courtesy WDDTY)
Gray State.  Trailer. 3 mins.  Profound
OK on that sombre video above, let's hope decency and sanity prevail.
Until next. Be Well.  Geoff