Wednesday 21 April 2021


 Hello and welcome. Well its the third day after my Oxford second jab and  a harrowing tale; I got on the 384 bus route (really hoping for the 107 both go to the same destination, however the 107 is a shorter time). I got to Edgeware Bus Station and mall, where upon a policeman smiled and said 'thank you for wearing a mask exemption label'. I then got on a waiting 288 bus and arrived at the large chemist shop where my first appointment label was 'officially stamped' and the date and batch number with AstraZeneca were stamped thereupon.

From Advert Yosil's bakery  Chemist two doors to right.
On the journey from Edgeware to the chemist shop the 288 was involved in an accident and so we decamped and waited for another, a chance to sit in the sun for a half hour on a bench nearby until the next bus arrived.

On arrival I  was stamped, jabbed, toilet visit and as I did with the first jab four weeks back went into the Kosher Baker shop and treated myself to a Smoked Salmon and cream cheese bagel and an apple crumble cake, yum, yum. This is not my usual fare but I felt a little treat especially after my long journey and some trepidation about the second jab and the blood clotting I did feel a treat was on. 
From Time Table
On arrival at Edgeware Bus station and getting off of the bus in order to get on the 107 or 384, my legs started to wobble, my hips seized up and I went dizzy and my left arm numb. The policeman recognised me from the label as earlier and he sat me down and fetched me a glass of water. He said I should try and get to Edgeware hospital which was a few minutes away, he phoned the hospital and told them to meet by the bus stop as was arriving on the 32 (I think) there I was met by a very nice attendant and taken into cubicle, the doctor examined me and said I should rest for a couple of hours.

After a couple of hours I felt a little better and was given a lift by a hospital volunteer to Edgeware Station where I hoped for a 107 and yes got the 384.

The following day I filled out a report on an official 'yellow card' about my symptoms to which as above added were lymph's swollen, rash and fatigue. I called my local clinic and doctor came out as I felt real bad and he confirmed vaccine symptoms and told me if they got worse to phone for an ambulance, I had a good nights sleep, the next day Timo took my blood and this morning I got my results, they were slightly raised as in Friday 16thApril 2021 'Words Fail Me' but to keep an eye on it. I felt slightly better.
Courtesy Gfycat
I told you so by many friends; if you hadn't been so big and pig headed this needn't of happened, you were always stubborn, well we shan't listen to you again and so on.
You listened to your intuition, you write blogs, did some healing, sprouted on about health issues well this proves you are as you say a blundering hypocrite and so on. Oh no it was the smoked salmon bagel and that crumble.
You make me sick, I trusted you and now this, well I hope this will teach you a lesson and so on. One actually hoped I would be maimed by it.
Then some said well you can visit us now and perhaps you are not as intuitive as you thought or felt. It will be nice to see you now that you're are vaccinated. Well done buddy you did the right thing. Great courage to do it for a platelet test and result despite the warnings of clotting. I don't believe the platelet thing and your private lab, you've conned me. (I have never claimed enlightenment or being a guru and have said many times I can be wrong and make up your own minds and I merely comment on others works and a few remarks I have gleaned and felt to be supportive of the articles). I have had mentors and teachers but have never joined a religion, a sect, a cult, I have never worshiped a Guru or anyone but pray and meditate, I pray to that which created all that was , is and will be and my prayer is 'thank you for my life and the life of all there is and I am grateful for being me'. 

Only one dear friend supported me and my colleagues at the lab. I still say and will stand by 'if it is my karma I will know soon enough as I believe Karma is catching us up fast, I still stand by my decisions and I have learnt even more to trust what I feel to be right and I have the right to change my mind. Mahatma Gandhi once was asked 'why have you changed your mind'? He said I have learned a bit more and so have revised my position'. Of course I am not anyway near Gandhi ji, but surely I have a right to be me and if it offends, upsets or anything else this is not my fault, I have to be me. When I was offered chemotherapy for my lung tumour and prostate tumours I refused and I followed what my intuition prompted me to do and that was a severe warning from two top consultant oncologists and a three month warning to death that was the end of 1999 and mid 2020. Well once again if I come over as  a stubborn old git of 82 so be it, if I suffer or die because of the vaccine well I can only say I followed what I felt was right.  
Mask Health Evidence

Posted on: 

Tuesday, April 20th 2021 at 1:00 pm

Written By: 

GreenMedInfo Research Group

This article is copyrighted by GreenMedInfo LLC, 2021
Visit our Re-post guidelines

A new study on face masks highlight their inefficacy, lack of safety and ability to cause physiological, psychological and long-term health problems, which may culminate in immune suppression, worsened chronic disease, accelerated aging and premature death

Baruch Vainshelboim, who works with the cardiology division at Stanford's Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System in California, is among the latest to sound the alarm that face masks should be avoided for the general public.

It's not simply an issue of whether or not they "work" -- though as he writes, "scientific evidence supporting facemasks' efficacy is lacking" -- or that wearing something is better than nothing because, as noted by Vainshelboim, "adverse physiological, psychological and health effects are established."[i]

The paradox, he notes, has been apparent from the beginning as SARS-CoV-2 affects the respiratory system, potentially leading to respiratory failure and death (though it should be noted that the case fatality rate is low -- considerably less than 1% or, according to Dr. Anthony Fauci and colleagues in March 2020, consequences may be "more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza"[ii]).

Facemasks, by their very nature, restrict breathing, calling into question their clinical basis as a protective strategy. Face masks can cause a low level of oxygen in the blood (hypoxemia) along with excessive carbon dioxide in your bloodstream (hypercapnia), and may "increase the risk for respiratory complications, self-contamination and exacerbation of existing chronic conditions."[iii]

Four Hypotheses Against Face Masks -- With Strong Scientific Support

Vainshelboim made four hypotheses, which were published in the journal Medical Hypotheses, along with scientific support offering validation.[iv] The fact that this report is published in Medical Hypotheses is important, as the journal exists to shine light on topics that might otherwise be buried.

"This is not a conventional journal and that is precisely why it exists," the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) noted. "It was founded out of a concern that valid scientific observations that depart from current trends will not make it through the conventional peer review process with a thesis that is radical or breaks an emergent mold."[v]

Considering the ongoing efforts to censor free speech and deplatform health websites that delve into topics outside of the official narrative, journals like these are more important now than ever before. Vainshelboim's hypotheses include:[vi]

1.      The practice of wearing facemasks has compromised safety and efficacy profile

2.      Both medical and non-medical facemasks are ineffective to reduce human-to-human transmission and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19

3.      Wearing facemasks has adverse physiological and psychological effects

4.      Long-term consequences of wearing facemasks on health are detrimental

Safety and Efficacy Are Lacking

Mild to moderate hypoxemia and hypercapnia that may occur from wearing a face mask interfere with your body's requirement for adequate oxygen and removal of carbon dioxide, leading to a series of physiologic effects:[vii]

Higher contribution of anaerobic energy metabolism

Decrease in pH levels

Increase in cells and blood acidity


Oxidative stress

Chronic inflammation


Health deterioration

These risks come with only an illusion of safety. The thread diameter of medical and non-medical face masks ranges from 55 micrometers (µm) to 440 µm, while SARS-CoV-2 has a diameter of 60 nanometers (nm) to 140 nm, which is more than 1,000 times smaller. This means the virus can pass through most face masks, which already have a low efficiency filtration rate of 0.7% to 26% for non-surgical, cotton masks.[viii]

A number of clinical studies also challenge their effectiveness, including one study showing no significant difference in coronavirus droplet transmission of particles >5 µm among symptomatic individuals wearing or not wearing a facemask.[ix]

Further, Vainshelboim noted, "Among asymptomatic individuals, there was no droplets or aerosols coronavirus detected from any participant with or without the mask, suggesting that asymptomatic individuals do not transmit or infect other people."[x]

Adverse Physiological and Psychological Effects

Restricting breathing over long periods of time while wearing a face mask is likely to make existing cardiopulmonary, metabolic, vascular and neurological conditions worse, while having significant adverse effects physically and psychologically.

A 2015 study of health care workers found that those wearing cloth masks had the highest rate of influenza-like illness, with the researchers cautioning against the use of cloth masks because moisture retention, reuse of the masks and poor filtration could increase infection risk.[xi] Vainshelboim's review of research further found the following adverse effects of face masks.

As you can see in the table below, the physiological and psychological effects may add up to long-term health consequences, including detrimental effects on the immune system, worsening of chronic diseases and accelerated aging and premature death:[xii]

Physiological Effects

Psychological Effects

Health Consequences


Activation of "fight or flight" stress response

Increased predisposition for viral and infection illnesses


Chronic stress condition


Shortness of breath



Increased lactate concentration

Mood disturbances


Decline in pH levels





Cardiovascular disease


Compromised cognitive performance







Alzheimer's disease

Increase in stress hormone levels (adrenaline, noradrenaline and cortisol)


Exacerbation of existing conditions and diseases

Increased muscle tension


Accelerated aging process



Health deterioration



Premature mortality

Wearing face masks also dehumanizes social connections, which are a basic human need. According to Vainshelboim:[xiii]

"Basic human-to-human connectivity through face expression is compromised and self-identity is somewhat eliminated. These dehumanizing movements partially delete the uniqueness and individuality of the person who is wearing the facemask as well as the connected person."

36 Studies Show Face Masks' Lack of Safety and Effectiveness

Our face mask database contains 36 studies on the lack of safety and effectiveness of what has become, in many areas, a mandated form of public health policy not to be questioned. One New York University professor, Mark Crispin Miller, even came under fire for urging his students to think critically about mask claims -- apropos for his course on Mass Persuasion and Propaganda.[xiv] Miller wrote:[xv]

"I do believe they should be thinking for themselves, and studying the evidence for any claim or mandate, instead of merely bowing to authority. That's my intellectual and civic obligation, as a teacher, whatever NYU's official policy, or New York State's. It's one thing to expect the students to obey their institution's rules, but quite another thing to urge them not to think about it."

This is the same theme being parroted in mainstream media, unfortunately, urging the public to accept the new mask culture even as the World Health Organization and the CDC previously advised against it. As AIER noted:[xvi]

"Given that masking of healthy populations for long periods of time is a new policy, it is astounding that the media and scientific journals decided within a matter of months that the efficacy of the practice could not be questioned or studied, nor its adverse effects discussed."

Likewise, Vainshelboim concluded that given the many risks and challenges to their safety and efficacy, governments, policy makers and health organizations should "utilize a proper and scientific evidence-based approach with respect to wearing facemasks," before mandating them as a preventive public health approach.


[i] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[ii] N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1268-1269

[iii] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[iv] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[v] American Institute for Economic Research April 15, 2021

[vi] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[vii] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[viii] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[ix] Nature Medicine volume 26, pages676-680(2020)

[x] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[xi] BMJ Open Volume 5, Issue 4

[xii] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[xiii] Medical Hypotheses January 2021, Volume 146 110411

[xiv] MSN September 24, 2020

[xv] News From Underground September 2020

[xvi] American Institute for Economic Research April 15, 2021

GMI Research Group

The GMI Research Group (GMIRG) is dedicated to investigating the most important health and environmental issues of the day.  Special emphasis will be placed on environmental health.  Our focused and deep research will explore the many ways in which the present condition of the human body directly reflects the true state of the ambient environment.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

A great man I once had the honour to have met albeit briefly suggested to me not to give advice on medical, political, religious and not to share personal stuff in public because he said the moment you say this someone will oppose it, the moment you form the 'This and That' organisation someone will form the anti This and That. That is alright if it is discussed and the opposition and you are willing to listen openly to one another's view  but this is rare and the most an uncomfortable compromise and a possible rupture of friendliness, to sit on the fence is also a compromise so what to do-----be still and listen to your intuition----here we go again.

I am not sure to blog again, there is not more I can say and if I ever go back on my word I do not want to have to explain myself and get fired upon I have had enough flack and took it on the chin, I am getting to the point that this world is insane and in insanity reason, logic and intuition are flying out of the window into a polluted environment.

Be Well


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.