From a laboratory and scientist
WE HAVE TO KEEP THE REMINDERS AND PRESSURE ON-----ITS A ONE IN A MILLION CHANCE
Oh cripes the Dystopian track and trace---you've been caught in the net
https://www.which.co.uk/news/2020/06/basic-food-standards-under-threat-from-us-trade-deal/?utm_source=whichcouk&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=campaignlaunch150520
ANOTHER DISASTER
https://naturallyhealthynews.com/breaking-journalists-bust-covid-drug-fraud-fake-study-is-retracted/
WHAT IS ‘LANCETGATE,’ AND HOW IS IT HURTING COVID-19 PATIENTS?
Those holding out hope that hydroxychloroquine could
save the lives of coronavirus patients may be happy to he
ar of a newly
uncovered drug scandal. The use of false data caused the latest COVID study to
be recanted.
Retracted study shows no
evidence antimalarial drug increases death risk
The original study,
published on May 22, 2020 , in The Lancet, was conducted with figures
supplied by Surgisphere Corp., a company based in the U.S. believed to have provided
fraudulent data. Weeks later, Guardian journalists dug deeper
into Surgisphere’s operations, uncovering bizarre inner workings such as a
small team of employees that included an adult model and a science fiction
author.
Surgisphere founder
Dr. Sapan Desai, who has been named in three cases of medical malpractice, is
listed among the study’s authors. In the original Lancet study, data from nearly
96,000 COVID-19 patients was supposedly analysed from 671 hospitals within
Surgisphere’s worldwide database of 1,200 hospitals.
After the study’s
adverse outcome was published — claiming that COVID-19 patients who took
hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug, experienced higher rates of
fatalities and heart complications — the Guardian
Australia noted
disparities in the numbers. While the Surgisphere study claimed that 73
Australian COVID-19 patients had died as of April
21, 2020 ,
Johns Hopkins University numbers showed only 67
COVID-19 deaths in Australia by the same date.
Dr. Desai created Surgisphere in 2008 as a medical
education company and provider of textbooks. Only recently, Surgisphere
announced its ownership of a 96,000-patient global database. The earliest
evidence of Surgisphere’s use of analytical software dates back to just a year
ago. There don’t appear to be any scientists or epidemiologists working for the
company.
It wasn’t until the Guardian contacted the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and The Lancet that the journals’
“expressions of concern” were released, calling Surgisphere’s credibility into
question.
As news spread,
over 120 researchers refuted Surgisphere’s findings in an open letter written
to The Lancet editor. Authors of the
letter pointed out discrepancies that included “inadequate adjustment for known
and measured cofounders,” not adhering to “standard practices in the machine learning
and statistics community,” and lack of an ethics review and data sources.
How quickly this
fraud was pulled off — shown by how rapidly negative news about
hydroxychloroquine circulated — has led many to call it “LancetGate.” The
eventual withdrawal of the Surgisphere study is one of the biggest retractions
ever made by The Lancet.
Even in a global
pandemic where lives are at stake, the NEJM and The Lancet may have been reluctant to
retract because nixing hydroxychloroquine helped turn a profit. Research
published against hydroxychloroquine caused clinical trials to be cancelled.
This made room for drug companies to patent a COVID vaccine to generate
billions in sales, the same companies that fund scientific journals.
It’s unsettling to see how willing major medical
journals are to publish fraudulent findings. Because scientific journals are
primarily financed by pharmaceutical companies, studies backing toxic
medications — able to generate revenue — are widely distributed, while potentially
helpful information about off-patent drugs like hydroxychloroquine is buried.
Consumer trust may be the biggest cost of this
retraction. Valuable time has also been lost investigating Surgisphere and
debunking their study, time that could have been spent on COVID research.
The push to find a universal and life-saving treatment
for COVID-19 has expose weaknesses in our scientific and medical communities.
Consumers are being urged to have faith in researchers’ ability to contain the
pandemic. Meanwhile, scammers find openings to push their agendas through
unchecked, delaying and downplaying options for effective treatment.
As hydroxychloroquine trials
continue, scorned researchers decline comment
The release of Surgisphere’s flawed findings caused
the World Health Organization (WHO) to halt its trials on hydroxychloroquine
immediately. Currently, WHO has resumed research, and multiple other clinical
trials are in process.
Dr. Desai’s response, when asked to explain the
retraction of his fraudulent study? Expectedly, it was, “No comment.”
In a previous statement, Professor Mandeep Mehra of Harvard Medical School , lead study author, said, “I
did not do enough to ensure that the data source was appropriate for this use.
For that, and for all the disruptions – both directly and indirectly – I am
truly sorry.”
Hydroxychloroquine isn’t off the table yet, now that
studies have been discredited for monetising medicine. Research into its use as
a COVID-protective and preventative continue, and in the meanwhile, we can
mount our best defence by using other proven compounds — like vitamin C and
selenium — to strengthen immunity.
An April 2020 American Journal of Clinical
Nutrition study
found COVID-19 cure rates to be significantly associated with blood levels of
selenium among patients in China . Likewise, high-dose vitamin
C, used in other critical care situations to save lives of septic patients, has
also been used to significantly improve the health of New York City ’s COVID-19 patients who were
treated with the vitamin intravenously.
And, American researchers from Northwestern University just linked COVID survival
rates to our levels of vitamin D. An analysis of patient data from 10 different
countries showed that having severe deficiency can cause hyperactive immunity.
“It is clear that vitamin D deficiency is harmful, and
it can be easily addressed with appropriate supplementation,” Vadim Backman,
lead researcher, said. “This might be another key to helping protect vulnerable
populations, such as African-American and elderly patients, who have a
prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.”
Increasing vitamin D, the study showed, might offer
twice the protection against major complications of COVID-19.
There is a simple Steroid drug for 'altitude Pathogen' err sorry corona virus err Covid -19 that is being trialled at Oxford and shows promise, however the side effects of steroids are not pleasant and like all drugs one has to weigh up the pros and cons.
REMINDER FROM POST 392 Z June 1st 2020
REMINDER FROM POST 392 Z June 1st 2020
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/490006-death-certificates-covid-19-do-not-trust/?ut the misleading figures about deaths.
Did Fred Flintstonetstone cause climate change?
As many scientists are now considering the sixth extinction which is showing signs and gives the climate change folk a headache. Covaltitidiude whatnot which will pale besides this when it takes firm hold---I wonder why Fred Flintstone exhaust fumes caused climate change and forget the asteroid bumf .
A reminder that all the planets are getting climate change---see details from POSTS 370 onward and from 1970 when I first began writing and then blogging.
Yabadabadoo
I'm sorry look what I have done to the thermosphere, the mesosphere,magnetosphere and the Ionosphere!!!!///???
Be Well
Geoff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.