 |
| Courtesy IMGFLIP.COM |
•
Bill Gates, Indian Government Targeted in Lawsuit Alleging
AstraZeneca Vaccine Killed 23-Year-Old
A
lawsuit against Bill Gates, the Indian government and others, citing extensive
case law, is attracting renewed scrutiny of Gates and his long-term, controversial
involvement in
By
See more in link above
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
·
Seven applicants, on behalf of the British
population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC),
accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and
crimes of aggression
·
The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr.
Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca
and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several
other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller
Foundation and the World Economic Forum
·
According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants
have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the
Rome Statute
·
The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research
ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in
·
The ICC is a permanent, independent court that
investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities
are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been
ratified by more than 120 countries, including the
According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power
figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID
jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity,
war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:1
“In a stunning 46-page
legal filing2 to
the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and
seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William
Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code.
These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the
The Dirty 16
In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing
are:
1.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the
NIAID
2.
Dr. Peter Daszak, president of
EcoHealth Alliance
3.
Bill Gates
4.
Melinda Gates
5.
Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
6.
Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
7.
Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
8.
Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson &
Johnson
9.
Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus,
director-general of the WHO
10.
Boris
11.
Christopher Whitty,
12.
Matthew Hancock, former
13.
Medicines and Healthcare, current
14.
June Raine,
15.
Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the
Rockefeller Foundation
16.
Klaus Schwab, president of the
World Economic Forum
The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was
filed, are “the peoples of the
At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about
the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for
their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world.
In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a
depopulation agenda.
“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be
used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible
interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a
“Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April 2021.3
What Is the International Criminal Court?
The International Criminal Court4,5 (ICC) is
an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in
The ICC is a permanent, independent court that
investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of
genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression. In
theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that
doesn’t always happen.
If warranted, the court can prosecute and try
individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do
so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the
perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in
question from criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint:6
“We have tried to
raise this case through the local English police and the
The statute for the
ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national
criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable
genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)).
This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”
Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law
enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the
court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own
police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are
scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16
defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.
Violation 1 — The Nuremberg
The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics
principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in
Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity
of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg
Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws,
including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians
to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”
While not a binding law, the complaint argues that the
Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article
21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international
treaties, international custom and principles of law recognized by civilized
nations as being of equal value.
Violation 2 — Genocide
Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of
genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national,
ethnical, racial or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British
population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the
elderly, chronically ill and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:
·
Killing
·
Causing serious bodily or mental
harm
·
Imposing measures intended to
reduce fertility
·
Deliberately inflicting conditions
of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction
All of these definitions apply in this case, and
details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to
“conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction,” this includes both
the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns,
and damaging people’s immune systems through the refusal to offer early
treatment, mask mandates and coercing people to take the COVID jab.
Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity
Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against
humanity, which includes:
|
Murder |
Extermination |
|
Imprisonment
or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules
of international law |
Torture |
|
Enforced
sterilizations |
Persecution
of any identifiable group |
|
Apartheid and
other inhumane acts |
|
The specific charges under each are detailed in the
complaint, with data to support them.
Violation 4 — War Crimes
War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome
Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the
people of the
“... the members of
the
We submit therefore
that the members of the
War crimes listed in the complaint include:
|
Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID
jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed
with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots. Not only are they asking for a full investigation
into the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, they
also want a full investigation into the suspected assassination of Dr.
Andreas Noack, a German chemist and a top graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral
thesis described the conversion of graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide.
According to the complaint: “Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the
university of Almeria, and alongside Dr. Andreas Noack he examined the covid
‘vaccines’ for the presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman
Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. According to both doctors, the
vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide. On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released
a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected
into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’
recipients ... On 18th November 2020 Dr. Andreas Noack was on a
‘livestream’ on YouTube discussing the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’
when he was arrested on camera by armed German police (Appendix 41). On We request a full investigation be done into the
inclusion of Graphene hydroxide in theCovid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the
assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack.” |
|
Torture by
way of forced mask wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic
chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon. |
|
Willfully
causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples
include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID
jab mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare,
the use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of
alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and
euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam. |
|
Extensive
destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military
necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly. |
|
Intentionally
directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part
in any hostilities. |
|
Intentionally
launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians,
damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to
the natural environment. |
Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression
The last violation is crimes of aggression against the
British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According
to the complaint:
“This is a global
criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now
obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation
states, with a few exceptions.
It is also clear that
powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as
the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the
centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD
BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as
the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other
world leaders.
The goal of this
activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by
dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an
un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the
peoples of the Earth.
In addition to this,
the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market
shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment
of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.
This is being done by
means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the
vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All
of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental
breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our
Fundamental Human rights.
It is of the utmost
urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to
stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination
passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently
being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court
injunction.”
New Findings Will ‘Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry’
In a January 1, 2022, video announcement (featured at
the top of this article), Dr. Reiner Fuellmich8 — a
U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and cofounder of the German Corona
Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona
Untersuchungsausschuss)9,10,11 launched
July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is “enough
to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”
Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis
tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but
now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot
numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the
public.
According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to
determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people
have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain
different dosages and even different ingredients.
According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have
“hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021
showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.12
In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500
different Pfizer jab batches, with some having a toxicity, as evidenced by
deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have a toxicity that is
2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths
attributed to them.
Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the
vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their
experimentation, so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly
batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all experimenting with
dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able to do this
is because there are no review boards overseeing any of them.
There’s now an interesting site where you can search the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data based on your lot number, to see if you got one of the more dangerous batches. You can find that dashboard here.13 The video below explains how to use the dashboard.
“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being
premeditation,” Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there
is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for
injuries and deaths.
Without doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health and our children's futures.
Be Well
Geoff
 |
| Courtesy fr.memedrold.com |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.