Friday, 15 August 2025

ENVIRONMENTAL

Courtesy link below

Hello and welcome. This is I feel the most important aspect of todays survival, of course wars and so on are vitally important aspects to know and research and try to stop and restore sanity an peace.

https://www.rt.com/news/621058-deadly-weather-modification-bill/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

Angerer / Getty Image

FILE PHOTO: US House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. © Drew Angerer / Getty Images

US House Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who once claimed that the Democrats can “control the weather,” has announced a federal bill aimed at banning what she called the “deadly practice” of geoengineering.

The move follows devastating rainstorms and flash flooding in ( snip from link)

Courtesy American Military University

During my research I came across several differing views I am going to give references and some in full version;

This is a most controversial subject and I am going out on a limb with alternative views and in the end we must decide through research, study, common sense and gut feelings.

Global warming stopped 16 years ago, Met Office report reveals: MoS got it right about warming... so who are the 'deniers' now?

By DAVID ROSE FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY

PUBLISHED: 01:12, 13 January 2013 | UPDATED: 01:13, 13 January 2013

Last year The Mail on Sunday reported a stunning fact: that global warming had ‘paused’ for 16 years. The Met Office’s own monthly figures showed there had been no statistically significant increase in the world’s temperature since 1997.

We were vilified. One Green website in the US said our report was ‘utter bilge’ that had to be ‘exposed and attacked’.

The Met Office issued a press release claiming it was misleading, before quietly admitting a few days later that it was true that the world had not got significantly warmer since 1997 after all. A Guardian columnist wondered how we could be ‘punished’( Quote from article)

49 Former NASA Scientists Send A Letter Disputing Climate Change

NASA Administrator Charles Bolden

Is NASA playing fast and loose with climate change science? That's the contention of a group of 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts.
On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.
"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."
The group features some marquee names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA's Johnson Space Centre in Houston.
The letter included a request for NASA to refrain from mentioning CO2 as a cause of global warming in future press releases and websites. The agency's "Global Climate Change" web page says that "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change."

HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.

49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.

The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.

H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.

“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”

Select excerpts from the letter:

“The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
“We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
“We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”

The full text of the letter:

March 28, 2012

The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001

Dear Charlie,

We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.

The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.

As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.

For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.

Thank you for considering this request.

Sincerely,

(Attached signatures)

CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science

CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center

Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.

/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years

/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years

/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years

/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years

/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years

/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years

/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years

/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years

/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years

/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years

/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years

/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years

/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years

/s/ Anita Gale

/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years

/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years

/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years

/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years

/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years

/s/ Thomas J. Harmon

/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years

/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years

/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years

/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years

/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years

/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years

/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years

/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years

/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen

/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years

/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years

/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years

/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years

/s/ Tom Ohesorge

/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years

/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years

/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years

/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years

/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years

/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years

/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years

/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years

/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years

/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years

/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years

/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years

/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years

Apologies for this full readout but the internet has edited or left out main points.

Next I would like to draw your attention to;

Courtesy NASA Science--Solar System

May 24th 2021

These links especially the last two show the changes in the planets and are too far away from the Sun to cause climate change directly and do not have human climate changes to the climate and that a natural cycle is occurring and the solar system is moving into an area of space that is hot and turbulent and is causing CLIMATE CHANGE throughout the Solar System and in fact we are humans even if we stopped all climate errors through technology and pollution IT would still happen and is related to the cycles of the Five Mass extinctions. Governments denied chemtrails however if you look at Space Law 2977 under section 7C you will find them under exotic weaponry you can find the law in my search box top left.

Courtesy New York Times

Now to Geo engineering; looking at the image above a rough description would be contrails from the aeroplane and chemtrails that spread out and DIM the sunlight the idea being the Sun's rays which by the way have intensified as the Sun's cycles are changing, see research by Nassim Haramein

https://youtu.be/dJdxwQtv6cc?si=ghMQcNFRiHu3C7Xh an 8 hr video explaining the Sun and its extradentary incident with a planet and hopefully NASA cover up of the Pulsing Sun.

Many scientists feel that chemtrails that block to Sun's rays cause the a trap or cover to let natural precipitation to take place like a blanket covering the Earth and that the idea of blocking the Sun's rays actually blocks carbon monoxide from dispersing over a wider expense of space.

I could on and on however, there is enough research to for one to go into it in detail. Hopefully you will get the taste of it and go into things related to it, such as additives, colouring GMO foods, space junk decaying and chemicals from this and most of this is in back articles.

Be Healthy Be well

Geoff aka Shack

Tuesday, 5 August 2025

URGENT --urgent-- URGENT

Courtesy spaceweather.com

Hello greetings and welcome.

In some back articles (can find in search bar top left) I have mentioned and stressed Satellite degradation and the chemicals that are in the mix and the pollution results.

I hereby print the spaceweather.com article and the more detailed account for those interested in the science which are in the report as separate entries.

Right: A current map of Starlink satellites orbiting Earth. [more]

Even before the current surge, scientists were sounding the alarm. In February 2023, NASA flew a WB-57 aircraft over Alaska at 60,000 feet to collect stratospheric aerosols. A study published later that year found 10% of sampled particles contained aluminum and other metals from the "burn-up" of satellites.

With multiple companies racing to deploy megaconstellations, projections suggest more than 60,000 satellites could be in orbit by 2040. That means reentry debris could soon rival the natural influx of meteoroids, but with very different chemistry. Meteors are mostly rock. Satellites are mostly metal.

A simulation by NOAA scientists suggests that aluminum-rich space dust could heat the stratosphere and mesosphere by up to 1.5°C, and slow the southern polar vortex, potentially altering global weather patterns. (spelling is USA)(in August 5th. edition which the text is from there is more to read)

What happens next? We’re about to find out. spaceweather.com

Should you read the the studies mentioned which are more detailed with graphs and simulations. You will get the full impact of the situation.

Geoff aka Shack

Saturday, 2 August 2025

CAN IT BE ACHIEVED

Hello and a very warm welcome. This video below sets out a lot of what I felt and articled during Covid and many years before. I have always questioned Big Pharma ever since I can remember and have been at their hands so to speak for years gone by and more recently with my retired GP, a super person of integrity and caring. Yet we had over eighteen years many a discussion about the diagnosis he foisted upon me and the results from the visits for tests at hospitals. He was sincere and totally loyal to his training and abilities to carry them out. I could see the anxiety on his face when I questioned his recommendations for a drug or treatment or the result of a diagnosis from the hospital. We did have some wonderful sharing's and humour. We met some years later in a supermarket and he looked well and content and more or less conceded I was sometimes correct but he had to follow protocol.

https://youtu.be/2Y_PxTxLFVg?si=Ytwvl4RH5VO_V3tA

Courtesy Pinterest

In the UK we have had Public Inquests hearings about the Covid mistakes, injuries, hurts and deep emotional injuries and bitterness, the accounts by families are so harrowing that it is hard to listen or watch and then followed by scandals re Post Office injustices to Post Masters who were accused of fraud and so on, some committed suicide, some imprisoned and now after years their compensation being slowly dragged out by a reluctant cash strapped government couple this with the Blood Inquest, Military injuries, military wives and then the Great Water Pollution of our rivers and seas. What sort of reason comes from this and we can ask what mentality of our leaders and business community can do this where is their common decency, their respect for life and those who champion honesty and morality are put down and often smeared and we all may ask why me, why madness like this exists.

Courtesy Wikipedia

The horror and and shock to the mind of such pictures and worse too many it is too much and one blanks it, puts it to the back of the mind as if we really feel it or have felt it and so it gets put out of mind by numbing the event through distraction or illness of some sort'
Both of these show the terror of cruelty and horror

Just as the rape of nature and the rape of humanities morals and care along with the environment and the mentality behind such action and decisions can cause some people to depression just reading this or in the media and it being so wide and general in all countries it can make one feel lonely, isolated, questioning their sanity and those who put on a proud and defiant face often mocked and hurt by aggressors. The number of Atheletes who get hate and abusive mail, those who stalk celebrities, human trafficking and human organ trade, animals cruelly treated and the spraying of pesticides and additives in food with GMO and chemtrails and so on, one may wonder what the war torn children without parents, some with horrific injuries could they become bitter demented terrorists of the future and many Hollywood films depict a demented despotic figure wreaking havoc and coming from social deprivation, abuse and mutilation in their childhood. So what is the solution.

Courtesy Medium

No matter what official body comes to vote as in the UN and is ignored or vetoed, or government endeavours to find solutions, what countries try to hold ceasefires, treaties they fade and often are just a temporary 'ceasefire' of war or abuse in order to regroup and start again. The religious and doctrinal rights carried on for centuries, history repeating itself and one wonders do we ever learn from our past mistakes? As you may surmise I can only say it is to with tradition, culture, technicity, greed and lust for power and where does this stem from YES I feel it stems from the caption below;

Notice in particular the phrases 'teaching or influencing with PERSISTENT repetition' this is mind conditioning, brain washing and is not education. Education is to enable a young mind or those who hold stiff non negotiable areas of contention and belligerence to explore choice and be open to other areas of differing ideas and qualities. Universities fail in free discussion often ruled by policy and funding from their political masters, religions, through dogma and political authorities through trading and border issues through mineral wealth and the use for their superior weaponry. Just how to break inculcation is a personal and individual who really sits down and thinks of those issues that divide and drive peoples to war not only with other countries but in family relationships and then to find ways to lessen this. The hard truth maybe to change oneself , to realise the despise we may have in ourselves, to be honest and admit to oneself I have hate, bias, anger and all and by some chance, I restrain it and by this restraint I bottle up and it can explode in some episode somewhere or get buried in the mind, slowly fermenting and then causing beliefs and actions that come to the fore.

Courtesy Nature

It takes courage and honesty to examine without bias if this is even possible to look and watch without bias, attention without intention and just watch as an interested third person so to speak the mind in action to stand back as it were and acknowledge the subtle belief systems, the logical assumptions and the religious and spiritual values with ethics that one has employed for years and have assumed a reality that is one's life. Can one do this and then maybe feel the false inculcation that has been repeatably and persistently pounded into us and we realise we had no choice or were persuaded to follow because there was no seemingly other choice available.

GEOFF aka SHACK

GEOFF FREED ONLINE