Hello its good to link up with you and know you are who you are in essence, no matter what religion, cult, political persuasion, social etiquette, status in society for we all share the same oxygen and it circulates, however before we had the ability to discern we were inculcated with a name, a religion (Atheism and so on are beliefs and to me a religion in a sense)ethics, political bias, cultural aptitudes and unless we question who are we in essence we are brain washed and taught almost everything we know.
Often we travel on the same rigid train lines because of the inculcate process of continuous messages, information and peer example forming such fervent beliefs which make up what appears to be our reality and yet on close inspection and deep reflection had we by chance, karma, destiny, divine providence or a one night alcoholic sex frenzy (the one night fling or stand) be born into a orphanage, taken to foster parents or be like some children given away, homeless and be 'station children' in India and elsewhere.
It might be useful if one is serious to find out a little about some serious questions; who was I before I was brain washed or named and packaged, why do I believe what I do, is it because it makes me feel safe and angry if my beliefs are challenged or at least uncomfortable, unsure and go into denial, what if I have no beliefs and just make them up and then find a comfortable way of living which in the end forms a loose belief system, who created Life before my parents copulated, is the basic me before brain washing somehow connected to the formation of the Universe and so on, I am sure if one is serious there will be more questions than answers, this is what science is finding.
In the above image who am I, should one fill in details it would have to be what you define yourself as, one may have to defend or attack to preserve that content, then again it may be one's reality and on death where has that reality led one too, is death a reality as a finality, is there and afterlife and if so I may have arrived from a pre- life which maybe the same as the afterlife, because Life is Life and the energy which is Life may exist before and after birth and be a continuum or a seamless continuous stream of consciousness. An unending process without a final destination or accomplishment a continuous process and experiment of creative endeavour to upgrade and reconfigure as the process lends itself by the best and proved elements in order to construct the next forms and then to dissolve them in order to make space from the habits of structure to new forms that live and then fade with the antiquity and 'sell by date' and need new infrastructures to evolve and to evolve to no plane or blueprint but the from the inspiration that spontaneously and intuitively prompts it, in other words Life's magic
Courtesy Reb's World-Weebly
We may defined as a person by our beliefs as good, bad, indifferent or whatever but does a belief make one acceptable if it clashes with someone else's beliefs. Am I just my beliefs? What if one's beliefs is child sacrifice, animal slaughter to appease one's God, female circumcision, flagellation and so on. It might be useful if one is serious to find out a little about some serious questions; who was I before I was brain washed or named and packaged, why do I believe what I do, is it because it makes me feel safe and angry if my beliefs are challenged or at least uncomfortable, unsure and go into denial, what if I have no beliefs and just make them up and then find a comfortable way of living which in the end forms a loose belief system, who created Life before my parents copulated, is the basic me before brain washing somehow connected to the formation of the Universe and so on, I am sure if one is serious there will be more questions than answers, this is what science is finding.
In the above image who am I, should one fill in details it would have to be what you define yourself as, one may have to defend or attack to preserve that content, then again it may be one's reality and on death where has that reality led one too, is death a reality as a finality, is there and afterlife and if so I may have arrived from a pre- life which maybe the same as the afterlife, because Life is Life and the energy which is Life may exist before and after birth and be a continuum or a seamless continuous stream of consciousness. An unending process without a final destination or accomplishment a continuous process and experiment of creative endeavour to upgrade and reconfigure as the process lends itself by the best and proved elements in order to construct the next forms and then to dissolve them in order to make space from the habits of structure to new forms that live and then fade with the antiquity and 'sell by date' and need new infrastructures to evolve and to evolve to no plane or blueprint but the from the inspiration that spontaneously and intuitively prompts it, in other words Life's magic
I have this uneasy feeling that they will put nano stuff in the vaccines and DNA technology that was spoken about in a back POST in a video interview with the Dark Journalist and Elana Freeland in POST 376 13th August 2019 and the USA obsession with vaccinations, vaccinations are not good but they can be less problematic if they didn't have so many adjutants in them. There is a move to make vaccinations mandatory world wide, it's all connected to the 'internet of everything'.
This is connected to an idea by technocrats to have total
control and consumption and so they regulate food and commodities with the sale
pitch –its economical, less waste and sustainable---downside their control and ours
less choice
JUST A ROBOT Courtesy East Coat Radio
OR
A robot with a human interface or a mini brain as in back POST
Courtesy of The Movie Data Base
OR
A robot with a human interface or a mini brain as in back POST
Courtesy of The Movie Data Base
Real-life RoboCop set to patrol the streets in place of human policemen
by 2020
The desert city has announced plans to fit real-life robocops
with artificial intelligence systems to help them automatically stop criminals.
"Robots could do the work of a police officer on ground at
certain situations," Colonel Khalid Razooqi, general director of the Dubai
Police Smart Department, told Emirates 24/7 .
"The project we are working on will involve robots
interacting with people and performing some responsibilities that of a police
officer."
This was in POST 267 Friday 3rd June 2016
REFER TO ATLAS ROBOT in previous POSTS.
Shock: Google Claims It Has Achieved ‘Quantum
Supremacy’
Andrew Yang: Climate Change May Require
Elimination of Car Ownership
Oh dear-- in a petrol strike a few years back I saw a friend of mine in a queue at the petrol pumps, he has a one of those big off road four wheel drive cars-----I said to him your home and office is only five miles away have you thought of getting a bus---the reply was a string of profanity and he said 'I'd rather move home than that' and a number of people I know feel the same way. I gave up driving some fourteen years ago, and many people who know me give me a hoot when they pass me at the bus stop and they laugh and some say 'there's the activist and conspiracy freak' I have several millionaire 'friends' one or two live in the in new Smart Homes. It may deem as though I have sour grapes and that I live on two small pensions but I feel with what is my lot and am content that they enjoy their lives, I do not envy them.
Climate Scientists Write To UN: There Is No
Climate Emergency
49 Former NASA Scientists Send A Letter Disputing Climate Change
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden
On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.
"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."
The group features some marquee names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA's Johnson Space Centre in Houston.
The letter included a request for NASA to refrain from mentioning CO2 as a cause of global warming in future press releases and websites. The agency's "Global Climate Change" web page says that "Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began. This is the most important long-lived "forcing" of climate change."
HOUSTON, TX – April 10, 2012.
49 former NASA scientists and astronauts sent a letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden last week admonishing the agency for it’s role in advocating a high degree of certainty that man-made CO2 is a major cause of climate change while neglecting empirical evidence that calls the theory into question.
The group, which includes seven Apollo astronauts and two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, are dismayed over the failure of NASA, and specifically the Goddard Institute For Space Studies (GISS), to make an objective assessment of all available scientific data on climate change. They charge that NASA is relying too heavily on complex climate models that have proven scientifically inadequate in predicting climate only one or two decades in advance.
H. Leighton Steward, chairman of the non-profit Plants Need CO2, noted that many of the former NASA scientists harbored doubts about the significance of the C02-climate change theory and have concerns over NASA’s advocacy on the issue. While making presentations in late 2011 to many of the signatories of the letter, Steward realized that the NASA scientists should make their concerns known to NASA and the GISS.
“These American heroes – the astronauts that took to space and the scientists and engineers that put them there – are simply stating their concern over NASA’s extreme advocacy for an unproven theory,” said Leighton Steward. “There’s a concern that if it turns out that CO2 is not a major cause of climate change, NASA will have put the reputation of NASA, NASA’s current and former employees, and even the very reputation of science itself at risk of public ridicule and distrust.”
Select excerpts from the letter:
- “The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.”
- “We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated.”
- “We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject.”
The full text of the letter:
March 28, 2012
The Honorable Charles Bolden, Jr.
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
NASA Administrator
NASA Headquarters
Washington, D.C. 20546-0001
Dear Charlie,
We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled.
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.
For additional information regarding the science behind our concern, we recommend that you contact Harrison Schmitt or Walter Cunningham, or others they can recommend to you.
Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
(Attached signatures)
CC: Mr. John Grunsfeld, Associate Administrator for Science
CC: Ass Mr. Chris Scolese, Director, Goddard Space Flight Center
Ref: Letter to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, dated 3-26-12, regarding a request for NASA to refrain from making unsubstantiated claims that human produced CO2 is having a catastrophic impact on climate change.
/s/ Jack Barneburg, Jack – JSC, Space Shuttle Structures, Engineering Directorate, 34 years
/s/ Larry Bell – JSC, Mgr. Crew Systems Div., Engineering Directorate, 32 years
/s/ Dr. Donald Bogard – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 41 years
/s/ Jerry C. Bostick – JSC, Principal Investigator, Science Directorate, 23 years
/s/ Dr. Phillip K. Chapman – JSC, Scientist – astronaut, 5 years
/s/ Michael F. Collins, JSC, Chief, Flight Design and Dynamics Division, MOD, 41 years
/s/ Dr. Kenneth Cox – JSC, Chief Flight Dynamics Div., Engr. Directorate, 40 years
/s/ Walter Cunningham – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 7, 8 years
/s/ Dr. Donald M. Curry – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Leading Edge, Thermal Protection Sys., Engr. Dir., 44 years
/s/ Leroy Day – Hdq. Deputy Director, Space Shuttle Program, 19 years
/s/ Dr. Henry P. Decell, Jr. – JSC, Chief, Theory & Analysis Office, 5 years
/s/Charles F. Deiterich – JSC, Mgr., Flight Operations Integration, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Harold Doiron – JSC, Chairman, Shuttle Pogo Prevention Panel, 16 years
/s/ Charles Duke – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 16, 10 years
/s/ Anita Gale
/s/ Grace Germany – JSC, Program Analyst, 35 years
/s/ Ed Gibson – JSC, Astronaut Skylab 4, 14 years
/s/ Richard Gordon – JSC, Astronaut, Gemini Xi, Apollo 12, 9 years
/s/ Gerald C. Griffin – JSC, Apollo Flight Director, and Director of Johnson Space Center, 22 years
/s/ Thomas M. Grubbs – JSC, Chief, Aircraft Maintenance and Engineering Branch, 31 years
/s/ Thomas J. Harmon
/s/ David W. Heath – JSC, Reentry Specialist, MOD, 30 years
/s/ Miguel A. Hernandez, Jr. – JSC, Flight crew training and operations, 3 years
/s/ James R. Roundtree – JSC Branch Chief, 26 years
/s/ Enoch Jones – JSC, Mgr. SE&I, Shuttle Program Office, 26 years
/s/ Dr. Joseph Kerwin – JSC, Astronaut, Skylab 2, Director of Space and Life Sciences, 22 years
/s/ Jack Knight – JSC, Chief, Advanced Operations and Development Division, MOD, 40 years
/s/ Dr. Christopher C. Kraft – JSC, Apollo Flight Director and Director of Johnson Space Center, 24 years
/s/ Paul C. Kramer – JSC, Ass.t for Planning Aeroscience and Flight Mechanics Div., Egr. Dir., 34 years
/s/ Alex (Skip) Larsen
/s/ Dr. Lubert Leger – JSC, Ass’t. Chief Materials Division, Engr. Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Dr. Humbolt C. Mandell – JSC, Mgr. Shuttle Program Control and Advance Programs, 40 years
/s/ Donald K. McCutchen – JSC, Project Engineer – Space Shuttle and ISS Program Offices, 33 years
/s/ Thomas L. (Tom) Moser – Hdq. Dep. Assoc. Admin. & Director, Space Station Program, 28 years
/s/ Dr. George Mueller – Hdq., Assoc. Adm., Office of Space Flight, 6 years
/s/ Tom Ohesorge
/s/ James Peacock – JSC, Apollo and Shuttle Program Office, 21 years
/s/ Richard McFarland – JSC, Mgr. Motion Simulators, 28 years
/s/ Joseph E. Rogers – JSC, Chief, Structures and Dynamics Branch, Engr. Directorate,40 years
/s/ Bernard J. Rosenbaum – JSC, Chief Engineer, Propulsion and Power Division, Engr. Dir., 48 years
/s/ Dr. Harrison (Jack) Schmitt – JSC, Astronaut Apollo 17, 10 years
/s/ Gerard C. Shows – JSC, Asst. Manager, Quality Assurance, 30 years
/s/ Kenneth Suit – JSC, Ass’t Mgr., Systems Integration, Space Shuttle, 37 years
/s/ Robert F. Thompson – JSC, Program Manager, Space Shuttle, 44 years/s/ Frank Van Renesselaer – Hdq., Mgr. Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters, 15 years
/s/ Dr. James Visentine – JSC Materials Branch, Engineering Directorate, 30 years
/s/ Manfred (Dutch) von Ehrenfried – JSC, Flight Controller; Mercury, Gemini & Apollo, MOD, 10 years
/s/ George Weisskopf – JSC, Avionics Systems Division, Engineering Dir., 40 years
/s/ Al Worden – JSC, Astronaut, Apollo 15, 9 years
/s/ Thomas (Tom) Wysmuller – JSC, Meteorologist, 5 years
ALSO FROM POSTS 390 ONWARD'S
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Take care and Be Well
Geoff
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.