Hello Folks Now the plot is revealing itself; in the UK and other countries they are doing similar 'brain storming' as below and various pressures to 'socially ' embarrass you' and use GUILT, DUTY, LOYALTY is to socially distance you, TAKE your kids away from you, separate kids in school and families who could not say farewell to their dying parents or grandparents, to use terrorists breaking psychological techniques to break the worlds population unique individuality to a 'blender' and as Huxley says below;
'A quote from Aldous Huxley's dystopian 1932 book, "Brave New World," reads:
"A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude."
IF WE DON'T ACT NOW AND DO SOMETHING WE BECOME COMPLIANT, ACQUIESCENT AND SHEEPLE(human sheep Bah, Bah,) BE WELL----Geoff
Vaccinations spread viruses they are meant to protect against see at end, something went wrong with my computer so I am compressing all up top==apologies===scroll right to end as 'fields on computer went haywire'.Apologies about spacing at the very end scroll to blank end please.
Dr. Anthony Fauci now recommends wearing goggles and full face shields in addition to masks, as the mucous membranes of your eyes may serve as entryways for viruses
· According to a report in JAMA Ophthalmology, only 5.2% of COVID-19 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the eyes, so while it’s possible SARS-CoV-2 could transmit via your eyes, the likelihood of this happening is very low
· Contamination of the eyes is likely primarily the result of touching your eyes with contaminated fingers. If you wear goggles or a face shield, you may actually be more prone to touch your eyes to rub away sweat and condensation and/or scratch an itch
· According to a COVID-19 vaccine developer, social distancing and face masks will likely still be required even after a vaccine becomes available, as the vaccine will not offer 100% protection against infection
· Guidelines for safer sex during the pandemic include wearing a mask, avoiding kissing, sticking to masturbation and having sex online, even though this means every encounter will be indefinitely stored and could end your career if hacked or shared
US health agencies are testing different marketing messages to convince the maximum number of people to have a COVID-19 vaccination when it becomes available.
A research team from Yale University has recruited 4,000 volunteers who will be given a range of marketing messages. The most effective is likely to be rolled out in national campaigns when a vaccine is launched.
The standard message that vaccines are safe and effective will be tested against other marketing messages, such as how the virus is restricting personal freedom or limiting the way people can earn a living or the benefits to the wider social good.
One message, called 'social pressure-anger', asks the participants to imagine how they would feel if they don't get vaccinated and spread the disease to their family and local community. Another, called 'trust in science', suggests that people who don't get vaccinated don't understand how viruses spread and ignore science.
The final message, 'not bravery', suggests that people who refuse the vaccine aren't brave compared to frontline responders, such as doctors and firefighters.
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
·
The U.S. government is
planning to launch an “overwhelming” COVID-19 vaccine campaign in November
·
It’s still unclear exactly when a vaccine will be
available, but it could be as early as October, or as late as January 2021.
According to a White House administration official, the advertising campaign
will be tailored to specific subsets of the population, depending on the people
the vaccine is likely to benefit the most
·
Yale University is studying the
effectiveness of various messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 to ensure
maximum vaccine uptake
·
The primary outcome measure is willingness to get
the COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary outcome measures include the participants’
confidence in the vaccine, their willingness to persuade others to get
vaccinated, their fear of those who have not been vaccinated and the level of
social judgment of those who choose not to vaccinate
·
Evidence that technocracy is gaining ground and is
in the final stages of implementation are all around. Technocracy is an
economic system, not a political one, which hinges on the skillful
implementation of social engineering
By the looks of it, we are about to face one of the most
aggressive vaccine campaigns ever created. According to Reuters,1 the U.S.
government is planning to launch an "overwhelming" COVID-19 vaccine
campaign come November, provided the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gives
one or more vaccine candidates the green light.
Considering former FDA commissioner Dr. Scott
Gottlieb2 is now on Pfizer's board of directors,3 and Pfizer's
COVID-19 vaccine is one of the lead candidates, jaded minds might assume the
FDA isn't going to put up any significant roadblocks.
According to Reuters, the COVID-19 vaccine
campaign "will likely be compressed into a short period of time, around
four to six weeks, to eliminate any lag between when Americans are alerted to
the vaccine and then they can get vaccinated." An unnamed "senior
White House administration official" is quoted saying:4
"The fine line we
are walking is getting the American people very excited about vaccines and
missing expectations versus having a bunch of vaccines in the warehouse and not
as many people want to get it. You may not hear a lot about promoting vaccines
over the airwaves in August and September but you'll be overwhelmed by it come
November."
Study Underway to Identify Most Effective Messaging
The idea
that the vaccine promotion might be more "overwhelming" than what
we're used to is further supported by a clinical study5 on
ClinicalTrials.gov, the aim of which is to identify the most "persuasive
messages for COVID-19 vaccine uptake."
The study,
conducted by Yale University , will test
"different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine
becomes available."
A total of
4,000 participants will be randomized to receive one of 12 different messages
(10 messaging variations, one control message and one baseline message), after
which they will "compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19
vaccine at three and six months of it becoming available." The messaging
slants under investigation include:6
Personal freedom message — A message about
how COVID-19 is limiting people's personal freedom, and how society, by
working together to get enough people vaccinated, can preserve its personal
freedom.
|
Economic freedom message — A message about
how COVID-19 is limiting people's economic freedom, and how society, by
working together to get enough people vaccinated, can preserve its economic
freedom.
|
Self-interest message — A message that COVID-19 presents
a real danger to one's health, even if one is young and healthy, and how
getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the best way to prevent oneself from
getting sick.
|
Community interest message — A message about
the dangers of COVID-19 to the health of loved ones: The more people who get
vaccinated against COVID-19, the lower the risk that one's loved ones will
get sick. Society must work together and all get vaccinated.
|
Economic benefit message — A message about
how COVID-19 is wreaking havoc on the economy and the only way to strengthen
the economy is to work together to get enough people vaccinated.
|
Guilt message — A message is about the danger that
COVID-19 presents to the health of one's family and community. Therefore, the
best way to protect them is not only by getting vaccinated, but to get
society to work together to get enough people vaccinated. Then a test
question asks the participant to imagine the guilt they will feel if they
don't get vaccinated and then spread the disease.
|
Embarrassment message — A message is about the danger
that COVID-19 presents to the health of one's family and community: The best
way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and by working together to make
sure that enough people get vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to
imagine the embarrassment they will feel if they don't get vaccinated and
spread the disease.
|
Anger message — The message is about the danger that
COVID-19 presents to the health of one's family and community. The best way
to protect them is by getting vaccinated and by working together to make sure
that enough people get vaccinated. It then asks the participant to imagine
the anger they will feel if they don't get vaccinated and spread the disease.
|
Trust in science message — A message about
how getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the most effective way of
protecting one's community, that vaccination is backed by science: If one
doesn't get vaccinated that means that one doesn't understand how infections
are spread or you are one who ignores science.
|
Not brave message — A message which describes how
firefighters, doctors and front line medical workers are brave: Those who
choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19 are not brave.
|
A quote from Aldous Huxley's dystopian 1932 book, "Brave New
World," reads:
"A really
efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive
of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves
who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude."
Huxley's
quote starts off a thought-provoking article8 on The Burning
Platform that reviews the rise of totalitarianism and parallels presented in
popular works of fiction. The author notes Huxley's book came on the heels of
Edward Bernay's 1928 book, "Propaganda" — a must-read for anyone
interested in understanding the historical foundations of modern public
relations. The article points out that, in his book, Bernay:9
"… revealed the
existence of an invisible government who used propaganda to manipulate the
minds of the public to insure those controlling the levers of power were able
to engineer their desired outcomes."
A
contemporary to Huxley and Bernay was George Orwell, who wrote the cult classic
"1984." In 1949, Huxley reportedly wrote to Orwell, stating he
believed the world's rulers would soon "discover that infant conditioning
and narco-hypnosis are more efficient as instruments of government than clubs
and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by
suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them
into obedience."10
PLEASE DO NOT BE LED AND FEEL GUILTY---ALL CULTURES AND RELIGIONS AND POLITICS RULE BY DUTY, GUILT, BLAME AND FEAR. I AM NOT RECOMMENDING VIOLENCE OR BREAKING THE LAW; AND OF COURSE IF THEY MAKE IT MANDATORY THEN OF COURSE IT IS BREAKING THE LAW---HOWEVER IT IS OUR BODY YOU HAVE THE VACCINE REFUSAL AND WHAT IS IN IT. SEE BELOW FOR THE REFUSAL AND FURTHER ON WHAT IS IN THE SHOT.
Step 1) Do not ‘refuse a
vaccine otherwise you will be considered belligerent. Instead you can politely
decline their services by doing the following.
2) Ask the doctor if the
vaccine has MRC-5 in it (they all do, these are aborted foetal cells and other DNA).
If it does, you have the right to decline.
3) Also ask if there is a
possibility of a ‘latrogenic reaction’ (an adverse reaction caused by multiple
compounds or drugs interacting with each other) from the vaccine (they all
do).when the doctor says “yes it does” that’s ‘your get out of vaccine free
jail card’. Thank the doctor for their offer and walk away.
Remember, doctors have
sworn the ‘Hippocratic Oath’ (which is to do no harm) and they MUST honour it.
This is how we can legally (and respectfully) decline their offered mandated
services and there is absolutely NOTHING they can do about it. Now you know.
Huxley
believed the nightmarish existence presented in "1984" was
"destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more
resemblance to that which I imagined in 'Brave New World'" and that this
transition would be the result of "a felt need for increased
efficiency." While Huxley did not use the word "technocracy,"
that's essentially what he was talking about.
Technocracy
101
Technocracy
is an economic and social engineering system that got started in the 1930s
during the height of the Great Depression, when scientists and engineers got
together to solve the nation's economic problems.
The
Trilateral Commission's co-founder Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Columbia University professor, brought the
concept of technocracy into the Commission in 1973, with the financial support
of David Rockefeller. Technocrats have silently and relentlessly pushed forward
ever since, and their agenda is now becoming increasingly visible.
At its
heart, technocracy is an economic system, not a political one. It actually
calls for, indeed demands, the total dismantling of the political system, which
includes the U.S. Constitution. In fact, the Constitution is the only thing
that has kept technocracy at bay this long in the U.S.
The system
also hinges on the skillful implementation of social engineering. Once fully
implemented, people won't have the ability to effectively fight it, but until
then, through peaceful civil disobedience, the sharing of information and the
exercise of political power, we still have a chance to prevent it.
Time is
running short, however. As noted by The Burning Platform,11 "Since 9/11,
the United States has unequivocally moved in the direction of Orwell's 1984
vision," and "We are now experiencing a dystopian amalgamation of the
worst of both novels," referring to "1984" and "Brave New
World."
Unfortunately,
many still cannot see the full picture, nor understand the ultimate real-world danger
of unquestioning compliance with ever-more illogical and freedom-quenching
recommendations and mandates.
Technocracy
Demands the Abolishment of Political Systems
Under
technocratic rule, nations are to be led by unelected leaders who decide which
resources companies can use to make certain products, and which products
consumers are ultimately allowed to buy. Technocracy is essentially a
resource-based economic system in which energy and social engineering run the
economy rather than pricing mechanisms such as supply and demand.
Patrick Wood
— an economist, financial analyst and American constitutionalist — has devoted
a lifetime to uncovering the mystery of what is controlling most of the
craziness we're currently seeing, and which has been exacerbated by the
COVID-19 pandemic. I go into more details on technocracy in my interview with Patrick Wood.
His two
books, "Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global
Transformation" and "Technocracy: The Hard Road to World Order"
delve into this new world order in greater depth. You can listen to our
interview below.
FROM MERCOLA.COM AND
A PATRICK WOOD VIDEO
from POSTS
PLEASE READ ;TORTURE TACTICS AND DEFINITION BY AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
MY POST AUG 10 2020 AND SEE THEY ARE USING TORTURE TACTICS ON THE WORLD'S POPULATION'
https://www.rt.com/russia/497732-worlds-first-covid-19-vaccine/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email RUSSIAN VACCINE
https://brendandmurphy.com/google-censorship-planned-for-covid-second-wave/ MORE CENSORSHIP------OH BOY----GOOD VIDEO
VACCINATION INFORMATION ' VACS SPREAD VIRUSES.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.